胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1-RAs)在2型糖尿病和慢性体重管理中的比较安全性:一项真实世界数据研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sarah Ruth Hurwitz, Stephan Lanes, Tracey Quimbo, Anahit Papazian, Jeff White, Vicki Fisher, Mark J Cziraky, Matthew J Crowley, Vincent J Willey
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1-RAs)在2型糖尿病和慢性体重管理中的比较安全性:一项真实世界数据研究","authors":"Sarah Ruth Hurwitz, Stephan Lanes, Tracey Quimbo, Anahit Papazian, Jeff White, Vicki Fisher, Mark J Cziraky, Matthew J Crowley, Vincent J Willey","doi":"10.1002/pds.70214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed serious clinical outcomes comparing glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and patients without diabetes using two chronic weight management (CWM) regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a new user, active comparator cohort study in a large, national U.S. claims database. Adults who initiated GLP-1-RAs, SGLT2-Is, naltrexone/bupropion (NalBup), or phentermine/topiramate (PhenTop) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2023 were included. Potential confounding was controlled using propensity score weighting for 82 clinical and demographic covariates, and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 330,684 GLP-1-RA users and 264,277 SGLT2-I users with T2DM. Among CWM patients without diabetes, we studied over 25,000 GLP-1-RA users, 5019 NalBup users, and 3841 PhenTop users. In both indications, GLP-1-RA users had higher rates of hospitalizations for gallbladder and biliary diseases with RRs ranging from 1.14 (95% CI: 1.06-1.22) in T2DM patients to 3.32 (95% CI: 1.44-7.64) in CWM patients. No reduction in the rate of cardiovascular events was observed for GLP-1-RA users with RRs ranging from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.37-2.25) in CWM patients to 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99-1.08) in T2DM patients. In T2DM patients, GLP-1-RA users had a lower rate of acute liver injury (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study corroborates an increased risk of hospitalization for gall bladder and biliary conditions among users of GLP-1-RAs and found similar rates as comparators of MI or stroke when GLP-1-RAs were used for T2DM or CWM. This real-world study complements placebo-controlled trials and can further inform prescribing decisions.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>The study protocol was pre-registered at the Center for Open Science's Real-World Evidence Registry and is publicly accessible online (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PSY74).</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RAs) in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Weight Management: A Real-World Data Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Ruth Hurwitz, Stephan Lanes, Tracey Quimbo, Anahit Papazian, Jeff White, Vicki Fisher, Mark J Cziraky, Matthew J Crowley, Vincent J Willey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed serious clinical outcomes comparing glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and patients without diabetes using two chronic weight management (CWM) regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a new user, active comparator cohort study in a large, national U.S. claims database. Adults who initiated GLP-1-RAs, SGLT2-Is, naltrexone/bupropion (NalBup), or phentermine/topiramate (PhenTop) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2023 were included. Potential confounding was controlled using propensity score weighting for 82 clinical and demographic covariates, and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 330,684 GLP-1-RA users and 264,277 SGLT2-I users with T2DM. Among CWM patients without diabetes, we studied over 25,000 GLP-1-RA users, 5019 NalBup users, and 3841 PhenTop users. In both indications, GLP-1-RA users had higher rates of hospitalizations for gallbladder and biliary diseases with RRs ranging from 1.14 (95% CI: 1.06-1.22) in T2DM patients to 3.32 (95% CI: 1.44-7.64) in CWM patients. No reduction in the rate of cardiovascular events was observed for GLP-1-RA users with RRs ranging from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.37-2.25) in CWM patients to 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99-1.08) in T2DM patients. In T2DM patients, GLP-1-RA users had a lower rate of acute liver injury (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study corroborates an increased risk of hospitalization for gall bladder and biliary conditions among users of GLP-1-RAs and found similar rates as comparators of MI or stroke when GLP-1-RAs were used for T2DM or CWM. This real-world study complements placebo-controlled trials and can further inform prescribing decisions.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>The study protocol was pre-registered at the Center for Open Science's Real-World Evidence Registry and is publicly accessible online (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PSY74).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"e70214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433752/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1-RAs)和葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2-Is)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者和非糖尿病患者中使用两种慢性体重管理(CWM)方案的严重临床结果。方法:我们在一个大型的美国国家索赔数据库中进行了一项新的用户、活跃的比较者队列研究。纳入了2016年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受GLP-1-RAs、sglt2is、纳曲酮/安非他酮(NalBup)或芬特明/托吡酯(PhenTop)治疗的成人。使用82个临床和人口学协变量的倾向得分加权来控制潜在的混淆,并估计风险比(rr)。结果:该研究纳入了330,684例GLP-1-RA使用者和264,277例SGLT2-I使用者。在没有糖尿病的CWM患者中,我们研究了超过25,000名GLP-1-RA使用者,5019名NalBup使用者和3841名PhenTop使用者。在这两种适应症中,GLP-1-RA服用者因胆囊和胆道疾病住院的比率较高,rr范围从T2DM患者的1.14 (95% CI: 1.06-1.22)到CWM患者的3.32 (95% CI: 1.44-7.64)。GLP-1-RA使用者的心血管事件发生率没有降低,CWM患者的rr为0.92 (95% CI: 0.37-2.25), T2DM患者的rr为1.03 (95% CI: 0.99-1.08)。在T2DM患者中,GLP-1-RA使用者的急性肝损伤发生率较低(RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64-0.91)。结论:本研究证实了GLP-1-RAs使用者因胆囊和胆道疾病住院的风险增加,并且发现当GLP-1-RAs用于T2DM或CWM时,其发生率与心肌梗死或卒中发生率相似。这项真实世界的研究补充了安慰剂对照试验,可以进一步为处方决策提供信息。方案注册:该研究方案已在开放科学中心的真实世界证据登记处预先注册,并可在线公开访问(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PSY74)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RAs) in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Weight Management: A Real-World Data Study.

Comparative Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RAs) in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Weight Management: A Real-World Data Study.

Comparative Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RAs) in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Weight Management: A Real-World Data Study.

Comparative Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RAs) in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Weight Management: A Real-World Data Study.

Purpose: This study assessed serious clinical outcomes comparing glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and patients without diabetes using two chronic weight management (CWM) regimens.

Methods: We performed a new user, active comparator cohort study in a large, national U.S. claims database. Adults who initiated GLP-1-RAs, SGLT2-Is, naltrexone/bupropion (NalBup), or phentermine/topiramate (PhenTop) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2023 were included. Potential confounding was controlled using propensity score weighting for 82 clinical and demographic covariates, and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated.

Results: This study included 330,684 GLP-1-RA users and 264,277 SGLT2-I users with T2DM. Among CWM patients without diabetes, we studied over 25,000 GLP-1-RA users, 5019 NalBup users, and 3841 PhenTop users. In both indications, GLP-1-RA users had higher rates of hospitalizations for gallbladder and biliary diseases with RRs ranging from 1.14 (95% CI: 1.06-1.22) in T2DM patients to 3.32 (95% CI: 1.44-7.64) in CWM patients. No reduction in the rate of cardiovascular events was observed for GLP-1-RA users with RRs ranging from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.37-2.25) in CWM patients to 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99-1.08) in T2DM patients. In T2DM patients, GLP-1-RA users had a lower rate of acute liver injury (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64-0.91).

Conclusions: This study corroborates an increased risk of hospitalization for gall bladder and biliary conditions among users of GLP-1-RAs and found similar rates as comparators of MI or stroke when GLP-1-RAs were used for T2DM or CWM. This real-world study complements placebo-controlled trials and can further inform prescribing decisions.

Protocol registration: The study protocol was pre-registered at the Center for Open Science's Real-World Evidence Registry and is publicly accessible online (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PSY74).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信