代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病患者可持续运动护理的共同设计方法

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shelley E Keating, Jack de Boer, Georgina Catsoulis, Jonathan G Stine, Ana Goode, Graeme A Macdonald, Elizabeth Powell, Ingrid J Hickman
{"title":"代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病患者可持续运动护理的共同设计方法","authors":"Shelley E Keating, Jack de Boer, Georgina Catsoulis, Jonathan G Stine, Ana Goode, Graeme A Macdonald, Elizabeth Powell, Ingrid J Hickman","doi":"10.14218/JCTH.2025.00155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet exercise maintenance is generally poor. This generative co-design process aimed to embed the voices and opinions of people with lived experience of MASLD and their care stakeholders to (i) frame barriers and enablers to exercise maintenance and (ii) highlight priorities for exercise-focused research agendas in MASLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A generative co-design framework was applied. Two virtual co-design sessions were undertaken: <i>Session 1</i> - <i>Framing the issue</i>, where initial discovery was conducted with people with lived experience of MASLD; and <i>Session 2</i> - <i>Generative design and sharing ideas</i> with lived experience partners and healthcare stakeholders. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and key determinants and considerations were discerned by two independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lived experience partners (n = 5, 53 ± 16 years, 40% male) ranked five equally important barriers to exercise maintenance: musculoskeletal and pain issues, lack of access to exercise equipment/facilities, cost, competing priorities, and low energy levels, which influenced core positive and negative determinants. Alongside lived experience partners, healthcare stakeholders (hepatologists [n = 3], exercise professionals [n = 3], 67% male) identified three core needs with eight considerations. Some disconnects in priorities were observed. Lived experience partners emphasized affordability, accessibility, and considerations for comorbidities, while healthcare partners advocated for research on natural history, prevention, behavior change, cost-effectiveness, and health system change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This co-design methodology highlights unique consumer-informed research questions. Exercise interventions and their associated implementation trials will benefit from being co-designed with both people with MASLD and care stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology","volume":"13 9","pages":"707-722"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing Approaches to Sustainable Exercise Care for People with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shelley E Keating, Jack de Boer, Georgina Catsoulis, Jonathan G Stine, Ana Goode, Graeme A Macdonald, Elizabeth Powell, Ingrid J Hickman\",\"doi\":\"10.14218/JCTH.2025.00155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet exercise maintenance is generally poor. This generative co-design process aimed to embed the voices and opinions of people with lived experience of MASLD and their care stakeholders to (i) frame barriers and enablers to exercise maintenance and (ii) highlight priorities for exercise-focused research agendas in MASLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A generative co-design framework was applied. Two virtual co-design sessions were undertaken: <i>Session 1</i> - <i>Framing the issue</i>, where initial discovery was conducted with people with lived experience of MASLD; and <i>Session 2</i> - <i>Generative design and sharing ideas</i> with lived experience partners and healthcare stakeholders. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and key determinants and considerations were discerned by two independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lived experience partners (n = 5, 53 ± 16 years, 40% male) ranked five equally important barriers to exercise maintenance: musculoskeletal and pain issues, lack of access to exercise equipment/facilities, cost, competing priorities, and low energy levels, which influenced core positive and negative determinants. Alongside lived experience partners, healthcare stakeholders (hepatologists [n = 3], exercise professionals [n = 3], 67% male) identified three core needs with eight considerations. Some disconnects in priorities were observed. Lived experience partners emphasized affordability, accessibility, and considerations for comorbidities, while healthcare partners advocated for research on natural history, prevention, behavior change, cost-effectiveness, and health system change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This co-design methodology highlights unique consumer-informed research questions. Exercise interventions and their associated implementation trials will benefit from being co-designed with both people with MASLD and care stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"707-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2025.00155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2025.00155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:有规律的运动是代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)患者的基础,但运动维持通常较差。这一生成式协同设计过程旨在将有MASLD生活经验的人及其护理利益相关者的声音和观点嵌入其中,以(i)构建运动维护的障碍和推动因素,以及(ii)突出MASLD中以运动为重点的研究议程的优先事项。方法:采用生成式协同设计框架。进行了两次虚拟共同设计会议:第一次会议-构建问题,与有MASLD生活经验的人进行初步发现;第二部分-生成式设计,并与生活体验合作伙伴和医疗保健利益相关者分享想法。会议录音和转录,关键的决定因素和考虑因素是由两个独立的研究人员辨别。结果:生活体验伴侣(n = 5, 53±16岁,40%男性)将运动维持的五个同样重要的障碍列为:肌肉骨骼和疼痛问题、缺乏运动设备/设施、成本、竞争优先级和低能量水平,这些因素影响了核心的积极和消极决定因素。除了生活体验合作伙伴,医疗保健利益相关者(肝病学家[n = 3],运动专业人士[n = 3], 67%的男性)确定了三个核心需求和八个考虑因素。观察到一些优先级的断开。生活体验合作伙伴强调可负担性、可及性和对合并症的考虑,而卫生保健合作伙伴则主张对自然史、预防、行为改变、成本效益和卫生系统变革进行研究。结论:这种共同设计方法突出了独特的消费者知情研究问题。运动干预及其相关的实施试验将受益于MASLD患者和护理利益相关者的共同设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Co-designing Approaches to Sustainable Exercise Care for People with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Co-designing Approaches to Sustainable Exercise Care for People with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Co-designing Approaches to Sustainable Exercise Care for People with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Background and aims: Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet exercise maintenance is generally poor. This generative co-design process aimed to embed the voices and opinions of people with lived experience of MASLD and their care stakeholders to (i) frame barriers and enablers to exercise maintenance and (ii) highlight priorities for exercise-focused research agendas in MASLD.

Methods: A generative co-design framework was applied. Two virtual co-design sessions were undertaken: Session 1 - Framing the issue, where initial discovery was conducted with people with lived experience of MASLD; and Session 2 - Generative design and sharing ideas with lived experience partners and healthcare stakeholders. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and key determinants and considerations were discerned by two independent researchers.

Results: Lived experience partners (n = 5, 53 ± 16 years, 40% male) ranked five equally important barriers to exercise maintenance: musculoskeletal and pain issues, lack of access to exercise equipment/facilities, cost, competing priorities, and low energy levels, which influenced core positive and negative determinants. Alongside lived experience partners, healthcare stakeholders (hepatologists [n = 3], exercise professionals [n = 3], 67% male) identified three core needs with eight considerations. Some disconnects in priorities were observed. Lived experience partners emphasized affordability, accessibility, and considerations for comorbidities, while healthcare partners advocated for research on natural history, prevention, behavior change, cost-effectiveness, and health system change.

Conclusions: This co-design methodology highlights unique consumer-informed research questions. Exercise interventions and their associated implementation trials will benefit from being co-designed with both people with MASLD and care stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
496
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信