Fabian Moser, Vera Maslova, Adrian Zaman, Thomas Demming, Martina Spehlmann, Mohammed Saad, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian
{"title":"双极导管消融是成功治疗室性心律失常的关键:来自双极-基尔研究的结果。","authors":"Fabian Moser, Vera Maslova, Adrian Zaman, Thomas Demming, Martina Spehlmann, Mohammed Saad, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian","doi":"10.1111/jce.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unipolar catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias but its efficacy can be limited in eliminating intramural arrhythmic origins. Bipolar ablation has emerged as a bail-out strategy. However, currently, it is being primarily utilized after a failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of endocardial and/or epicardial bipolar catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias within their first procedure or after a previously failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients who underwent bipolar CA between September 2022 and February 2025 were included. A total of 21 bipolar ablation procedures were performed in 19 patients (median age 66 ± 11, 11% female, median ejection fraction 42% ± 16%). In total, 16 procedures were performed due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT storm, five procedures were performed due to symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVC). In 48% of all cases, ablation was performed within the patient's first procedure. The interventricular septum was the most common site of bipolar ablation (11/21), followed by epi-endocardial bipolar ablation procedures (9/21) and the papillary muscle (1/21). Bipolar ablation was successful in 17/21 patients. In one patient, AV block occurred after bipolar ablation. During a median follow-up time of 12 ± 6 months, four patients with initially acute procedural success experienced recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bipolar catheter ablation is an effective tool for arrhythmias with an intramural origin. It is shown to be safe with a high acute success rate in patients undergoing their first or redo procedure for VT or PVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bipolar Catheter Ablation as a Key for Successful Treatment of Intramural VentricuLar Arrhythmias: Results From the Bipolar-Kiel Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Moser, Vera Maslova, Adrian Zaman, Thomas Demming, Martina Spehlmann, Mohammed Saad, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unipolar catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias but its efficacy can be limited in eliminating intramural arrhythmic origins. Bipolar ablation has emerged as a bail-out strategy. However, currently, it is being primarily utilized after a failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of endocardial and/or epicardial bipolar catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias within their first procedure or after a previously failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients who underwent bipolar CA between September 2022 and February 2025 were included. A total of 21 bipolar ablation procedures were performed in 19 patients (median age 66 ± 11, 11% female, median ejection fraction 42% ± 16%). In total, 16 procedures were performed due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT storm, five procedures were performed due to symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVC). In 48% of all cases, ablation was performed within the patient's first procedure. The interventricular septum was the most common site of bipolar ablation (11/21), followed by epi-endocardial bipolar ablation procedures (9/21) and the papillary muscle (1/21). Bipolar ablation was successful in 17/21 patients. In one patient, AV block occurred after bipolar ablation. During a median follow-up time of 12 ± 6 months, four patients with initially acute procedural success experienced recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bipolar catheter ablation is an effective tool for arrhythmias with an intramural origin. It is shown to be safe with a high acute success rate in patients undergoing their first or redo procedure for VT or PVC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bipolar Catheter Ablation as a Key for Successful Treatment of Intramural VentricuLar Arrhythmias: Results From the Bipolar-Kiel Study.
Background: Unipolar catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias but its efficacy can be limited in eliminating intramural arrhythmic origins. Bipolar ablation has emerged as a bail-out strategy. However, currently, it is being primarily utilized after a failed ablation attempt.
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of endocardial and/or epicardial bipolar catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias within their first procedure or after a previously failed ablation attempt.
Methods and results: Patients who underwent bipolar CA between September 2022 and February 2025 were included. A total of 21 bipolar ablation procedures were performed in 19 patients (median age 66 ± 11, 11% female, median ejection fraction 42% ± 16%). In total, 16 procedures were performed due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT storm, five procedures were performed due to symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVC). In 48% of all cases, ablation was performed within the patient's first procedure. The interventricular septum was the most common site of bipolar ablation (11/21), followed by epi-endocardial bipolar ablation procedures (9/21) and the papillary muscle (1/21). Bipolar ablation was successful in 17/21 patients. In one patient, AV block occurred after bipolar ablation. During a median follow-up time of 12 ± 6 months, four patients with initially acute procedural success experienced recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia.
Conclusion: Bipolar catheter ablation is an effective tool for arrhythmias with an intramural origin. It is shown to be safe with a high acute success rate in patients undergoing their first or redo procedure for VT or PVC.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.