3万例1型糖尿病患者新定义的连续血糖监测(CGM)指标与标准CGM指标的关系探讨

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Halis Kaan Akturk, Kagan Ege Karakus, Boyang Chen, Tomas C Walker
{"title":"3万例1型糖尿病患者新定义的连续血糖监测(CGM)指标与标准CGM指标的关系探讨","authors":"Halis Kaan Akturk, Kagan Ege Karakus, Boyang Chen, Tomas C Walker","doi":"10.1177/15209156251377797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Rebound hyperglycemia (RHyper), rebound hypoglycemia (RHypo), extended hyperglycemia (EHyper), and extended hypoglycemia (EHypo) are newly defined continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics. Here, we investigated the characteristics of these new metrics and the relationship between new CGM metrics and standard metrics. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, 30,000 CGM users with at least 90 days of CGM data were randomly selected from Dexcom Clarity database. Standard and new CGM metrics were calculated for each user. Four different cutoffs were used to define RHyper and RHypo, and two cutoffs were used to define EHyper and EHypo events. The number of RHyper, RHypo, EHyper, and EHypo events per week, mean duration of events, and mean area under the curve of events were calculated. For rebound events, the rate of change (ROC) was calculated. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to analyze the data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 61.8 ± 20.7%, mean glucose was 173 ± 37.1 mg/dL, and coefficient of variation (CV) was 32.1 ± 7.2%. RHyper, RHypo, and EHyper were more frequent during daytime and increased throughout the day. EHypo mostly occurred during nighttime. CV correlated strongly with RHyper (70-180 mg/dL) events/week (<i>r</i> = 0.67) and RHypo (180 to 70 mg/dL) events/week (<i>r</i> = 0.64). Time in range had the strongest correlation with EHyper events/week (<i>r</i> = -0.88) among new metrics. RHyper events and RHypo events were strongly correlated with each other (<i>r</i> = 0.92). RHyper and RHypo ROC have a stronger correlation with CV than the correlation between CV and time below range (TBR) metrics. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> For rebound and extended metrics, the most important metric was the number of events/week. RHyper and RHypo had a stronger correlation with CV and hypoglycemia metrics (TBR) than the correlation between CV and TBR. Thus, rebound events have the potential to detect hypoglycemia events caused by glycemic variability. [Figure: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Relationship Between Newly Defined Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics and the Standard CGM Metrics in 30,000 People with Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Halis Kaan Akturk, Kagan Ege Karakus, Boyang Chen, Tomas C Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15209156251377797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Rebound hyperglycemia (RHyper), rebound hypoglycemia (RHypo), extended hyperglycemia (EHyper), and extended hypoglycemia (EHypo) are newly defined continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics. Here, we investigated the characteristics of these new metrics and the relationship between new CGM metrics and standard metrics. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, 30,000 CGM users with at least 90 days of CGM data were randomly selected from Dexcom Clarity database. Standard and new CGM metrics were calculated for each user. Four different cutoffs were used to define RHyper and RHypo, and two cutoffs were used to define EHyper and EHypo events. The number of RHyper, RHypo, EHyper, and EHypo events per week, mean duration of events, and mean area under the curve of events were calculated. For rebound events, the rate of change (ROC) was calculated. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to analyze the data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 61.8 ± 20.7%, mean glucose was 173 ± 37.1 mg/dL, and coefficient of variation (CV) was 32.1 ± 7.2%. RHyper, RHypo, and EHyper were more frequent during daytime and increased throughout the day. EHypo mostly occurred during nighttime. CV correlated strongly with RHyper (70-180 mg/dL) events/week (<i>r</i> = 0.67) and RHypo (180 to 70 mg/dL) events/week (<i>r</i> = 0.64). Time in range had the strongest correlation with EHyper events/week (<i>r</i> = -0.88) among new metrics. RHyper events and RHypo events were strongly correlated with each other (<i>r</i> = 0.92). RHyper and RHypo ROC have a stronger correlation with CV than the correlation between CV and time below range (TBR) metrics. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> For rebound and extended metrics, the most important metric was the number of events/week. RHyper and RHypo had a stronger correlation with CV and hypoglycemia metrics (TBR) than the correlation between CV and TBR. Thus, rebound events have the potential to detect hypoglycemia events caused by glycemic variability. [Figure: see text].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251377797\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251377797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反跳性高血糖(RHyper)、反跳性低血糖(RHypo)、延伸性高血糖(EHyper)和延伸性低血糖(EHypo)是新定义的连续血糖监测(CGM)指标。在这里,我们研究了这些新度量的特征以及新CGM度量与标准度量之间的关系。材料和方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,从Dexcom Clarity数据库中随机选择3万名具有至少90天CGM数据的CGM使用者。为每个用户计算标准和新的CGM指标。使用四个不同的截止点来定义RHyper和RHypo事件,使用两个截止点来定义EHyper和EHypo事件。计算每周RHyper、RHypo、EHyper、EHypo事件发生次数、事件平均持续时间、事件曲线下平均面积。对于反弹事件,计算变化率(ROC)。采用Pearson相关和简单线性回归分析数据。结果:70 ~ 180 mg/dL的平均时间为61.8±20.7%,平均血糖为173±37.1 mg/dL,变异系数(CV)为32.1±7.2%。RHyper, RHypo和EHyper在白天更频繁,并且在白天增加。EHypo主要发生在夜间。CV与RHyper (70 ~ 180 mg/dL)事件/周(r = 0.67)和RHypo (180 ~ 70 mg/dL)事件/周(r = 0.64)密切相关。在新指标中,范围内时间与EHyper事件/周的相关性最强(r = -0.88)。RHyper事件与RHypo事件呈强相关(r = 0.92)。ryper和RHypo ROC与CV的相关性强于CV与TBR指标的相关性。结论:对于反弹和扩展指标,最重要的指标是事件/周的数量。RHyper和RHypo与CV和低血糖指标(TBR)的相关性强于CV和TBR。因此,反弹事件有可能检测由血糖变异性引起的低血糖事件。[图:见正文]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Relationship Between Newly Defined Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics and the Standard CGM Metrics in 30,000 People with Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: Rebound hyperglycemia (RHyper), rebound hypoglycemia (RHypo), extended hyperglycemia (EHyper), and extended hypoglycemia (EHypo) are newly defined continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics. Here, we investigated the characteristics of these new metrics and the relationship between new CGM metrics and standard metrics. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 30,000 CGM users with at least 90 days of CGM data were randomly selected from Dexcom Clarity database. Standard and new CGM metrics were calculated for each user. Four different cutoffs were used to define RHyper and RHypo, and two cutoffs were used to define EHyper and EHypo events. The number of RHyper, RHypo, EHyper, and EHypo events per week, mean duration of events, and mean area under the curve of events were calculated. For rebound events, the rate of change (ROC) was calculated. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to analyze the data. Results: Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 61.8 ± 20.7%, mean glucose was 173 ± 37.1 mg/dL, and coefficient of variation (CV) was 32.1 ± 7.2%. RHyper, RHypo, and EHyper were more frequent during daytime and increased throughout the day. EHypo mostly occurred during nighttime. CV correlated strongly with RHyper (70-180 mg/dL) events/week (r = 0.67) and RHypo (180 to 70 mg/dL) events/week (r = 0.64). Time in range had the strongest correlation with EHyper events/week (r = -0.88) among new metrics. RHyper events and RHypo events were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.92). RHyper and RHypo ROC have a stronger correlation with CV than the correlation between CV and time below range (TBR) metrics. Conclusions: For rebound and extended metrics, the most important metric was the number of events/week. RHyper and RHypo had a stronger correlation with CV and hypoglycemia metrics (TBR) than the correlation between CV and TBR. Thus, rebound events have the potential to detect hypoglycemia events caused by glycemic variability. [Figure: see text].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信