达非尼加曲美替尼治疗局部晚期或转移性BRAF v600e突变甲状腺乳头状癌的临床结果

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/WFPD3948
Yen-Hao Chen, Chen-Kai Chou, Shun-Yu Chi, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Pei-Wen Wang, Yi-Chia Chan
{"title":"达非尼加曲美替尼治疗局部晚期或转移性BRAF v600e突变甲状腺乳头状癌的临床结果","authors":"Yen-Hao Chen, Chen-Kai Chou, Shun-Yu Chi, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Pei-Wen Wang, Yi-Chia Chan","doi":"10.62347/WFPD3948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BRAF V600E is the most common oncogenic mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of combining dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC treated with dabrafenib and trametinib in either first-line or second-line settings were included. Dabrafenib was administered orally at 150 mg twice daily, alongside trametinib at 2 mg once daily. Response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A total of 71 PTC patients who received systemic therapy were identified, including 21 patients who experienced dabrafenib plus trametinib. For these 21 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66.7%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 85.7%. In the first-line setting, the ORR and DCR were higher at 75.0% and 91.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 40.7 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 47.7 months. While patients treated in the first-line setting (n=12) showed better PFS (40.7 months vs. 18.9 months) and OS (47.7 months vs. 39.4 months) compared to those treated in the second-line setting (n=9), the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, in the first-line treatment, 12 patients received dabrafenib plus trametinib, while 59 patients were treated with lenvatinib; no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the two groups. Most adverse events related to the combination therapy were grade 1-2, with no grade 3-4 toxicities reported. Additionally, most patients (75.0%) were able to receive subsequent treatments following disease progression to this combination therapy. The findings of current study highlight the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib combined with trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC, particularly as a first-line treatment. These findings suggest a promising therapeutic option for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 8","pages":"3524-3532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of dabrafenib plus trametinib in locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutant papillary thyroid cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Hao Chen, Chen-Kai Chou, Shun-Yu Chi, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Pei-Wen Wang, Yi-Chia Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/WFPD3948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BRAF V600E is the most common oncogenic mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of combining dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC treated with dabrafenib and trametinib in either first-line or second-line settings were included. Dabrafenib was administered orally at 150 mg twice daily, alongside trametinib at 2 mg once daily. Response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A total of 71 PTC patients who received systemic therapy were identified, including 21 patients who experienced dabrafenib plus trametinib. For these 21 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66.7%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 85.7%. In the first-line setting, the ORR and DCR were higher at 75.0% and 91.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 40.7 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 47.7 months. While patients treated in the first-line setting (n=12) showed better PFS (40.7 months vs. 18.9 months) and OS (47.7 months vs. 39.4 months) compared to those treated in the second-line setting (n=9), the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, in the first-line treatment, 12 patients received dabrafenib plus trametinib, while 59 patients were treated with lenvatinib; no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the two groups. Most adverse events related to the combination therapy were grade 1-2, with no grade 3-4 toxicities reported. Additionally, most patients (75.0%) were able to receive subsequent treatments following disease progression to this combination therapy. The findings of current study highlight the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib combined with trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC, particularly as a first-line treatment. These findings suggest a promising therapeutic option for this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"3524-3532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/WFPD3948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/WFPD3948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

BRAF V600E是甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)中最常见的致癌突变。本研究旨在评估达非尼联合曲美替尼治疗BRAF v600e突变型PTC患者的临床结果。BRAF v600e突变型PTC患者在一线或二线接受达非尼和曲美替尼治疗。口服达非尼150毫克,每日两次,与曲美替尼2毫克,每日一次。采用实体肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIST) 1.1版确定疗效。共有71例PTC患者接受了全身治疗,其中21例患者接受了达非尼加曲美替尼治疗。21例患者客观缓解率(ORR)为66.7%,疾病控制率(DCR)为85.7%。在一线环境下,ORR和DCR分别为75.0%和91.7%。中位无进展生存(PFS)为40.7个月,总生存(OS)为47.7个月。虽然接受一线治疗的患者(n=12)比接受二线治疗的患者(n=9)表现出更好的PFS(40.7个月对18.9个月)和OS(47.7个月对39.4个月),但差异无统计学意义。一线治疗中,达非尼+曲美替尼12例,lenvatini59例;两组间PFS和OS无显著差异。与联合治疗相关的大多数不良事件为1-2级,未报告3-4级毒性。此外,大多数患者(75.0%)在疾病进展到这种联合治疗后能够接受后续治疗。目前的研究结果强调了达非尼联合曲美替尼在BRAF v600e突变型PTC患者中的有效性和安全性,特别是作为一线治疗。这些发现为这类患者提供了一个有希望的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes of dabrafenib plus trametinib in locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutant papillary thyroid cancer.

BRAF V600E is the most common oncogenic mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of combining dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC treated with dabrafenib and trametinib in either first-line or second-line settings were included. Dabrafenib was administered orally at 150 mg twice daily, alongside trametinib at 2 mg once daily. Response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A total of 71 PTC patients who received systemic therapy were identified, including 21 patients who experienced dabrafenib plus trametinib. For these 21 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66.7%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 85.7%. In the first-line setting, the ORR and DCR were higher at 75.0% and 91.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 40.7 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 47.7 months. While patients treated in the first-line setting (n=12) showed better PFS (40.7 months vs. 18.9 months) and OS (47.7 months vs. 39.4 months) compared to those treated in the second-line setting (n=9), the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, in the first-line treatment, 12 patients received dabrafenib plus trametinib, while 59 patients were treated with lenvatinib; no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the two groups. Most adverse events related to the combination therapy were grade 1-2, with no grade 3-4 toxicities reported. Additionally, most patients (75.0%) were able to receive subsequent treatments following disease progression to this combination therapy. The findings of current study highlight the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib combined with trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant PTC, particularly as a first-line treatment. These findings suggest a promising therapeutic option for this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信