内皮活化和应激指数(EASIX)作为预测ruxolitinib治疗类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病失败的生物标志物

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Sergio Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Nihar Desai, Carol Chen, Kareem Jamani, Catherine Sohier-Pohier, Christopher Lemieux, Jennifer White, Mohamed Elemary, Michael Kennah, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Eshrak Al-Shaibani, Igor Novitzky-Basso, Ivan Pasic, Arjun Datt Law, Fotios V Michelis, Auro Viswabandya, Rajat Kumar, Jonas Mattsson, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim
{"title":"内皮活化和应激指数(EASIX)作为预测ruxolitinib治疗类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病失败的生物标志物","authors":"Sergio Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Nihar Desai, Carol Chen, Kareem Jamani, Catherine Sohier-Pohier, Christopher Lemieux, Jennifer White, Mohamed Elemary, Michael Kennah, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Eshrak Al-Shaibani, Igor Novitzky-Basso, Ivan Pasic, Arjun Datt Law, Fotios V Michelis, Auro Viswabandya, Rajat Kumar, Jonas Mattsson, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) remains a significant challenge after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). While ruxolitinib (RUX) has shown efficacy for SR-aGvHD, failure predictors are poorly defined. We assessed 78 patients from six Canadian centres who received RUX for SR-aGvHD. Failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary end-point. Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) scores were calculated at defined time points, dichotomized using recursive partitioning. A risk score for RUX failure was developed based on key variables. At RUX initiation, 76% of patients had grade 3-4 aGvHD. The best overall response rate was 75%; 58% experienced RUX failure, while the 6-month FFS was 25.7%. EASIX gradually increased over time even after RUX (p < 0.001). Patients with high EASIX at RUX ≥1.11 had a lower FFS at 6 months (17%) than the patients with low EASIX (54%) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75 [95%CI 1.23-6.15], p = 0.014). A three-factor RUX failure risk score-gut aGvHD, grade 4 aGvHD and high EASIX at RUX start-stratified patients by 6-month FFS rates: 85.7%, 28.0% and 11.0% for score 0 (n = 28), 1 (n = 25) and ≥2 (n = 34) (HR 2.25[1.42-3.55], p < 0.001). High EASIX can predict the risk of RUX failure in addition to gut aGvHD and grade 4 aGvHD. We propose to add other therapeutic interventions to RUX therapy pre-emptively to high EASIX patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) as a biomarker to predict ruxolitinib failure for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Nihar Desai, Carol Chen, Kareem Jamani, Catherine Sohier-Pohier, Christopher Lemieux, Jennifer White, Mohamed Elemary, Michael Kennah, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Eshrak Al-Shaibani, Igor Novitzky-Basso, Ivan Pasic, Arjun Datt Law, Fotios V Michelis, Auro Viswabandya, Rajat Kumar, Jonas Mattsson, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.70146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) remains a significant challenge after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). While ruxolitinib (RUX) has shown efficacy for SR-aGvHD, failure predictors are poorly defined. We assessed 78 patients from six Canadian centres who received RUX for SR-aGvHD. Failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary end-point. Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) scores were calculated at defined time points, dichotomized using recursive partitioning. A risk score for RUX failure was developed based on key variables. At RUX initiation, 76% of patients had grade 3-4 aGvHD. The best overall response rate was 75%; 58% experienced RUX failure, while the 6-month FFS was 25.7%. EASIX gradually increased over time even after RUX (p < 0.001). Patients with high EASIX at RUX ≥1.11 had a lower FFS at 6 months (17%) than the patients with low EASIX (54%) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75 [95%CI 1.23-6.15], p = 0.014). A three-factor RUX failure risk score-gut aGvHD, grade 4 aGvHD and high EASIX at RUX start-stratified patients by 6-month FFS rates: 85.7%, 28.0% and 11.0% for score 0 (n = 28), 1 (n = 25) and ≥2 (n = 34) (HR 2.25[1.42-3.55], p < 0.001). High EASIX can predict the risk of RUX failure in addition to gut aGvHD and grade 4 aGvHD. We propose to add other therapeutic interventions to RUX therapy pre-emptively to high EASIX patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70146\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病(SR-aGvHD)仍然是造血细胞移植(HCT)后的一个重大挑战。虽然ruxolitinib (RUX)已显示出对SR-aGvHD的疗效,但失败预测因素定义不清。我们评估了来自加拿大6个中心接受RUX治疗SR-aGvHD的78例患者。无故障生存期(FFS)为主要终点。在规定的时间点计算内皮激活和应激指数(EASIX)评分,使用递归划分进行二分类。基于关键变量,开发了RUX失败的风险评分。在RUX开始时,76%的患者为3-4级aGvHD。最佳总有效率为75%;58%的患者出现RUX失败,而6个月的FFS为25.7%。即使在RUX后,EASIX也随时间逐渐增加(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) as a biomarker to predict ruxolitinib failure for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease treatment.

Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) remains a significant challenge after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). While ruxolitinib (RUX) has shown efficacy for SR-aGvHD, failure predictors are poorly defined. We assessed 78 patients from six Canadian centres who received RUX for SR-aGvHD. Failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary end-point. Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) scores were calculated at defined time points, dichotomized using recursive partitioning. A risk score for RUX failure was developed based on key variables. At RUX initiation, 76% of patients had grade 3-4 aGvHD. The best overall response rate was 75%; 58% experienced RUX failure, while the 6-month FFS was 25.7%. EASIX gradually increased over time even after RUX (p < 0.001). Patients with high EASIX at RUX ≥1.11 had a lower FFS at 6 months (17%) than the patients with low EASIX (54%) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75 [95%CI 1.23-6.15], p = 0.014). A three-factor RUX failure risk score-gut aGvHD, grade 4 aGvHD and high EASIX at RUX start-stratified patients by 6-month FFS rates: 85.7%, 28.0% and 11.0% for score 0 (n = 28), 1 (n = 25) and ≥2 (n = 34) (HR 2.25[1.42-3.55], p < 0.001). High EASIX can predict the risk of RUX failure in addition to gut aGvHD and grade 4 aGvHD. We propose to add other therapeutic interventions to RUX therapy pre-emptively to high EASIX patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信