天然药物一定比现代药物对动物更仁慈吗?熊在中医中的应用

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Zhao Shichang, Li Jiarui, Tang Qing
{"title":"天然药物一定比现代药物对动物更仁慈吗?熊在中医中的应用","authors":"Zhao Shichang,&nbsp;Li Jiarui,&nbsp;Tang Qing","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>It is commonly assumed that natural and traditional medicine is inherently more ethical than modern, industrialized practices. However, this article challenges that assumption by highlighting the cruelty and immorality associated with bear bile extraction. The article argues that the most effective solutions to this problem lie in the development and promotion of synthetic and herbal alternatives, specifically artificial bear bile. Scientists have successfully developed synthetic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the key active compound in bear bile, which can be produced without harming animals. Additionally, herbal alternatives, derived from specific plants, have demonstrated comparable medicinal properties. The success of artificial bear bile not only provides equivalent therapeutic benefits without animal exploitation but also opens new avenues for the revitalization of traditional Chinese medicine.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 4","pages":"599-604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Natural Medicine Necessarily Kinder to Animals Than Modern Medicine? The Use of Bears in Traditional Chinese Medicine\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Shichang,&nbsp;Li Jiarui,&nbsp;Tang Qing\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajes.12632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>It is commonly assumed that natural and traditional medicine is inherently more ethical than modern, industrialized practices. However, this article challenges that assumption by highlighting the cruelty and immorality associated with bear bile extraction. The article argues that the most effective solutions to this problem lie in the development and promotion of synthetic and herbal alternatives, specifically artificial bear bile. Scientists have successfully developed synthetic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the key active compound in bear bile, which can be produced without harming animals. Additionally, herbal alternatives, derived from specific plants, have demonstrated comparable medicinal properties. The success of artificial bear bile not only provides equivalent therapeutic benefits without animal exploitation but also opens new avenues for the revitalization of traditional Chinese medicine.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"volume\":\"84 4\",\"pages\":\"599-604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,自然和传统医学本质上比现代的工业化做法更合乎道德。然而,这篇文章通过强调与熊胆提取相关的残忍和不道德来挑战这一假设。文章认为,解决这一问题最有效的方法是开发和推广合成和草药替代品,特别是人工熊胆。科学家们成功地合成了熊去氧胆酸(UDCA),这是熊胆汁中的关键活性化合物,可以在不伤害动物的情况下生产。此外,从特定植物中提取的草药替代品已证明具有类似的药用特性。人工熊胆的成功不仅在不利用动物的情况下提供了同等的治疗效果,而且为中医的振兴开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Natural Medicine Necessarily Kinder to Animals Than Modern Medicine? The Use of Bears in Traditional Chinese Medicine

It is commonly assumed that natural and traditional medicine is inherently more ethical than modern, industrialized practices. However, this article challenges that assumption by highlighting the cruelty and immorality associated with bear bile extraction. The article argues that the most effective solutions to this problem lie in the development and promotion of synthetic and herbal alternatives, specifically artificial bear bile. Scientists have successfully developed synthetic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the key active compound in bear bile, which can be produced without harming animals. Additionally, herbal alternatives, derived from specific plants, have demonstrated comparable medicinal properties. The success of artificial bear bile not only provides equivalent therapeutic benefits without animal exploitation but also opens new avenues for the revitalization of traditional Chinese medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信