{"title":"克服科学的残酷:伯纳德·罗林为动物权利而战","authors":"Barry Kipperman","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This essay focuses on the contributions of Dr. Bernard Rollin to the ethical treatment of animals. Rollin was a visionary who questioned systemic societal treatment of animals and promoted a new social ethic for animals. This new ethic centered on ensuring that animals have a “life worth living”. Rollin taught the first class on veterinary ethics in the United States and considered the need to recognize and address animal pain as a moral imperative at a time when the subjective experience of animals was largely dismissed. Rollin did not believe that humans were inherently morally superior to non-human animals. Rollin proposed that all sentient animals should have rights that protect them from oppression of fundamental aspects of their nature for the good of society. Rollin fought for improved treatment of animals in laboratories and on farms, via both the court of public opinion as well as legislation. Rollin understood that animal welfare is an increasing concern for society and that society looks to veterinary medicine for answers. He urged the veterinary profession to lead on ethical and animal welfare issues. Rollin recognized that what many referred to as “animal problems” were often problems created by, and solved by, humans and that humans were often secondary victims of moral stress when work-related expectations or requirements discourage behaviors that could prevent animal suffering. Perhaps most importantly in our polarized socio-political environment, Rollin strongly believed that achieving ethical change occurs when we can find common ground with those we disagree with.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 4","pages":"613-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Scientific Cruelty: Bernard Rollin's Fight for Animal Rights\",\"authors\":\"Barry Kipperman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajes.12637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This essay focuses on the contributions of Dr. Bernard Rollin to the ethical treatment of animals. Rollin was a visionary who questioned systemic societal treatment of animals and promoted a new social ethic for animals. This new ethic centered on ensuring that animals have a “life worth living”. Rollin taught the first class on veterinary ethics in the United States and considered the need to recognize and address animal pain as a moral imperative at a time when the subjective experience of animals was largely dismissed. Rollin did not believe that humans were inherently morally superior to non-human animals. Rollin proposed that all sentient animals should have rights that protect them from oppression of fundamental aspects of their nature for the good of society. Rollin fought for improved treatment of animals in laboratories and on farms, via both the court of public opinion as well as legislation. Rollin understood that animal welfare is an increasing concern for society and that society looks to veterinary medicine for answers. He urged the veterinary profession to lead on ethical and animal welfare issues. Rollin recognized that what many referred to as “animal problems” were often problems created by, and solved by, humans and that humans were often secondary victims of moral stress when work-related expectations or requirements discourage behaviors that could prevent animal suffering. Perhaps most importantly in our polarized socio-political environment, Rollin strongly believed that achieving ethical change occurs when we can find common ground with those we disagree with.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"volume\":\"84 4\",\"pages\":\"613-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12637\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Overcoming Scientific Cruelty: Bernard Rollin's Fight for Animal Rights
This essay focuses on the contributions of Dr. Bernard Rollin to the ethical treatment of animals. Rollin was a visionary who questioned systemic societal treatment of animals and promoted a new social ethic for animals. This new ethic centered on ensuring that animals have a “life worth living”. Rollin taught the first class on veterinary ethics in the United States and considered the need to recognize and address animal pain as a moral imperative at a time when the subjective experience of animals was largely dismissed. Rollin did not believe that humans were inherently morally superior to non-human animals. Rollin proposed that all sentient animals should have rights that protect them from oppression of fundamental aspects of their nature for the good of society. Rollin fought for improved treatment of animals in laboratories and on farms, via both the court of public opinion as well as legislation. Rollin understood that animal welfare is an increasing concern for society and that society looks to veterinary medicine for answers. He urged the veterinary profession to lead on ethical and animal welfare issues. Rollin recognized that what many referred to as “animal problems” were often problems created by, and solved by, humans and that humans were often secondary victims of moral stress when work-related expectations or requirements discourage behaviors that could prevent animal suffering. Perhaps most importantly in our polarized socio-political environment, Rollin strongly believed that achieving ethical change occurs when we can find common ground with those we disagree with.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.