{"title":"参数模型降阶方法解决磁准静态和电准静态问题的比较","authors":"Wei Chen, Thomas Henneron, Stéphane Clénet","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2025.104444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56133,"journal":{"name":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 104444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems\",\"authors\":\"Wei Chen, Thomas Henneron, Stéphane Clénet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.finel.2025.104444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X25001337\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X25001337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems
In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to provide ideas and information involving the use of the finite element method and its variants, both in scientific inquiry and in professional practice. The scope is intentionally broad, encompassing use of the finite element method in engineering as well as the pure and applied sciences. The emphasis of the journal will be the development and use of numerical procedures to solve practical problems, although contributions relating to the mathematical and theoretical foundations and computer implementation of numerical methods are likewise welcomed. Review articles presenting unbiased and comprehensive reviews of state-of-the-art topics will also be accommodated.