急诊部冠状动脉ct血管造影评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexander S. Finch MD , Samuel M. Keim MD, MS , Venkatesh R. Bellamkonda MD , Christopher R. Carpenter MD, MDS , Amal Mattu MD
{"title":"急诊部冠状动脉ct血管造影评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征","authors":"Alexander S. Finch MD ,&nbsp;Samuel M. Keim MD, MS ,&nbsp;Venkatesh R. Bellamkonda MD ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Carpenter MD, MDS ,&nbsp;Amal Mattu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chest pain is a common chief symptom in the emergency department (ED). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a critical diagnosis and, when missed, is associated with adverse patient outcomes and is frequently associated with malpractice claims. Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is increasingly available to ED patients and it may aid in diagnosis of ACS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Question</h3><div>In adults presenting to the ED with suspected ACS, does cCTA during ED evaluation improve patient-centered outcomes compared with standard interventions, such as clinical gestalt, the HEART score/pathway, and nonimaging disposition strategies?</div></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><div>Three studies were reviewed, including a before-and-after retrospective study, a randomized controlled trial, and a systematic review, in addition to consensus recommendations from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, American College of Radiology, and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with current ED management strategies for suspected ACS, routinely ordering cCTA for patients with chest pain does not improve 1-year cardiac outcomes, reduce admissions, or return visits. However, among low-risk (&lt; 10% baseline risk) patients with ACS, cCTA reduces hospital length of stay and lower costs while increasing revascularization rates. Ultimately, targeting cCTA for patients at higher short-term risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and limited access to invasive cardiac catheterization laboratories may prove to be more efficacious and cost-effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessment of Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department\",\"authors\":\"Alexander S. Finch MD ,&nbsp;Samuel M. Keim MD, MS ,&nbsp;Venkatesh R. Bellamkonda MD ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Carpenter MD, MDS ,&nbsp;Amal Mattu MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chest pain is a common chief symptom in the emergency department (ED). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a critical diagnosis and, when missed, is associated with adverse patient outcomes and is frequently associated with malpractice claims. Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is increasingly available to ED patients and it may aid in diagnosis of ACS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Question</h3><div>In adults presenting to the ED with suspected ACS, does cCTA during ED evaluation improve patient-centered outcomes compared with standard interventions, such as clinical gestalt, the HEART score/pathway, and nonimaging disposition strategies?</div></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><div>Three studies were reviewed, including a before-and-after retrospective study, a randomized controlled trial, and a systematic review, in addition to consensus recommendations from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, American College of Radiology, and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with current ED management strategies for suspected ACS, routinely ordering cCTA for patients with chest pain does not improve 1-year cardiac outcomes, reduce admissions, or return visits. However, among low-risk (&lt; 10% baseline risk) patients with ACS, cCTA reduces hospital length of stay and lower costs while increasing revascularization rates. Ultimately, targeting cCTA for patients at higher short-term risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and limited access to invasive cardiac catheterization laboratories may prove to be more efficacious and cost-effective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 71-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胸痛是急诊科常见的主要症状。急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是一个关键的诊断,如果错过,与不良的患者结果有关,并经常与医疗事故索赔有关。冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(cCTA)越来越多地用于ED患者,它可能有助于诊断ACS。与标准干预措施(如临床完形、HEART评分/通路和非成像处理策略)相比,在疑似ACS的ED患者中,cCTA是否能改善以患者为中心的结果?证据回顾:除了心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会和北美心血管成像学会的一致建议外,我们还回顾了三项研究,包括前后回顾性研究、随机对照试验和系统评价。结论:与目前疑似ACS的ED管理策略相比,胸痛患者常规行cCTA治疗并不能改善1年心脏预后、减少住院或复诊。然而,在低风险(10%基线风险)的ACS患者中,cCTA缩短了住院时间,降低了费用,同时增加了血运重建率。最终,针对短期发生重大心血管不良事件风险较高且进入有创心导管实验室的机会有限的患者,cCTA可能被证明是更有效和更具成本效益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessment of Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department

Background

Chest pain is a common chief symptom in the emergency department (ED). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a critical diagnosis and, when missed, is associated with adverse patient outcomes and is frequently associated with malpractice claims. Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is increasingly available to ED patients and it may aid in diagnosis of ACS.

Clinical Question

In adults presenting to the ED with suspected ACS, does cCTA during ED evaluation improve patient-centered outcomes compared with standard interventions, such as clinical gestalt, the HEART score/pathway, and nonimaging disposition strategies?

Evidence Review

Three studies were reviewed, including a before-and-after retrospective study, a randomized controlled trial, and a systematic review, in addition to consensus recommendations from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, American College of Radiology, and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Conclusions

Compared with current ED management strategies for suspected ACS, routinely ordering cCTA for patients with chest pain does not improve 1-year cardiac outcomes, reduce admissions, or return visits. However, among low-risk (< 10% baseline risk) patients with ACS, cCTA reduces hospital length of stay and lower costs while increasing revascularization rates. Ultimately, targeting cCTA for patients at higher short-term risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and limited access to invasive cardiac catheterization laboratories may prove to be more efficacious and cost-effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信