2003 - 2021年EPRI-SKB合作下的clab衰变热测量评估

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hatice Akkurt , Robert Hall , Fredrik Johansson , Amela Mehic , Jesper Kierkegaard , Henrik Liljenfeldt
{"title":"2003 - 2021年EPRI-SKB合作下的clab衰变热测量评估","authors":"Hatice Akkurt ,&nbsp;Robert Hall ,&nbsp;Fredrik Johansson ,&nbsp;Amela Mehic ,&nbsp;Jesper Kierkegaard ,&nbsp;Henrik Liljenfeldt","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of decay heat for spent nuclear fuel is important for wet storage (spent fuel pool heat management), cask/canister loading campaigns (ensuring that temperature limits are met), dry storage system aging management, transportation, and eventual disposal. Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2004 were published in 2006 and used across the globe for computer code validation purposes. Currently, Clab is the only facility in the world that performs full assembly decay heat measurements. Recently, EPRI and SKB entered into a collaborative agreement to evaluate and publish all Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021. The publicly available publication has not only extended the decay heat validation range significantly but has also improved characterization and evaluation of the measurements, including associated uncertainties.</div><div>In this paper, an overview of Clab decay heat measurements and evaluation of the measurement uncertainties for the decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021 are presented. Clab measurement uncertainty is re-evaluated to include previously unpublished calibration data, to assess the impact of data quality screening, and to review and revise certain prior conservative assumptions. The re-evaluation relies primarily on the accumulated population of Clab measured data. Finally, lessons learned and recommendations for future decay heat measurements are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106001"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of clab decay heat measurements from 2003 to 2021 under EPRI-SKB collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Akkurt ,&nbsp;Robert Hall ,&nbsp;Fredrik Johansson ,&nbsp;Amela Mehic ,&nbsp;Jesper Kierkegaard ,&nbsp;Henrik Liljenfeldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate estimation of decay heat for spent nuclear fuel is important for wet storage (spent fuel pool heat management), cask/canister loading campaigns (ensuring that temperature limits are met), dry storage system aging management, transportation, and eventual disposal. Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2004 were published in 2006 and used across the globe for computer code validation purposes. Currently, Clab is the only facility in the world that performs full assembly decay heat measurements. Recently, EPRI and SKB entered into a collaborative agreement to evaluate and publish all Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021. The publicly available publication has not only extended the decay heat validation range significantly but has also improved characterization and evaluation of the measurements, including associated uncertainties.</div><div>In this paper, an overview of Clab decay heat measurements and evaluation of the measurement uncertainties for the decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021 are presented. Clab measurement uncertainty is re-evaluated to include previously unpublished calibration data, to assess the impact of data quality screening, and to review and revise certain prior conservative assumptions. The re-evaluation relies primarily on the accumulated population of Clab measured data. Finally, lessons learned and recommendations for future decay heat measurements are provided.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025003993\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025003993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乏核燃料衰变热的准确估计对于湿储存(乏燃料池热管理)、桶/罐装载活动(确保满足温度限制)、干储存系统老化管理、运输和最终处置都很重要。2003年至2004年间进行的Clab衰变热测量结果于2006年发表,并在全球范围内用于计算机代码验证目的。目前,Clab是世界上唯一一家进行全组装衰变热测量的机构。最近,EPRI和SKB达成了一项合作协议,以评估和发布2003年至2021年间进行的所有Clab衰变热测量。公开的出版物不仅大大扩展了衰变热验证的范围,而且还改进了测量的表征和评估,包括相关的不确定性。本文概述了Clab衰变热测量的概况,并对2003年至2021年间进行的衰变热测量的测量不确定度进行了评估。重新评估实验室测量不确定度,以包括以前未发表的校准数据,评估数据质量筛选的影响,并审查和修改某些先前的保守假设。重新评估主要依赖于积累的Clab测量数据。最后,总结了本文的经验教训,并对今后的衰变热测量提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of clab decay heat measurements from 2003 to 2021 under EPRI-SKB collaboration
Accurate estimation of decay heat for spent nuclear fuel is important for wet storage (spent fuel pool heat management), cask/canister loading campaigns (ensuring that temperature limits are met), dry storage system aging management, transportation, and eventual disposal. Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2004 were published in 2006 and used across the globe for computer code validation purposes. Currently, Clab is the only facility in the world that performs full assembly decay heat measurements. Recently, EPRI and SKB entered into a collaborative agreement to evaluate and publish all Clab decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021. The publicly available publication has not only extended the decay heat validation range significantly but has also improved characterization and evaluation of the measurements, including associated uncertainties.
In this paper, an overview of Clab decay heat measurements and evaluation of the measurement uncertainties for the decay heat measurements performed between 2003 and 2021 are presented. Clab measurement uncertainty is re-evaluated to include previously unpublished calibration data, to assess the impact of data quality screening, and to review and revise certain prior conservative assumptions. The re-evaluation relies primarily on the accumulated population of Clab measured data. Finally, lessons learned and recommendations for future decay heat measurements are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信