人为因素如何以及为什么会影响互联路口的网络攻击后果?−伪造红灯倒计时案例研究

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Chen Chen , Zhixia Li , Heng Wei , Guohui Zhang , Mohamed M. Ahmed , John E. Ash , Kailai Wang
{"title":"人为因素如何以及为什么会影响互联路口的网络攻击后果?−伪造红灯倒计时案例研究","authors":"Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Zhixia Li ,&nbsp;Heng Wei ,&nbsp;Guohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;John E. Ash ,&nbsp;Kailai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication enhances traffic safety but is vulnerable to cyberattacks. Spoofing cyberattacks pose data falsification that endangers road users. Given that achieving high-level (L4-L5) automated driving still requires significant progress, understanding how and why human factors influence cyberattack consequences is novel yet essential for mitigating these risks. Research on this topic remains limited, and collecting driving behavior data under cyberattack conditions is challenging due to safety concerns. To address this, we conducted a driving simulator experiment with 32 drivers spanning a range of experience levels and other factors, replicating a connected intersection under no-attack and cyberattack scenarios. In-vehicle falsified red-light countdown spoofing attacks are designed to provide false information on the dashboard. Using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model, safety consequences were measured. Results indicate that cyberattacks pose significant threats to traffic safety. Greater speed at the end of the countdown period increases the risk of frontal (pedestrian and right-angle) collisions and reduces rear-end collision risks. Experienced drivers show lower hazards for frontal collisions. Notably, the total hazards under cyberattacks do not differ significantly between male and female drivers. Human factors affect safety by influencing driving behavior. Experienced drivers decelerate over shorter distances, reducing collision risk, while male and female drivers show similar deceleration patterns, resulting in comparable safety consequences. These findings provide a quantitative model describing human factors impacting cyberattack consequences, inform safer transportation management, and, more importantly, educate the public about cyberattacks. Future models can be developed to predict collision probabilities and improve system resilience (i.e., recovery after cyberattack).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How and why do human factors impact cyberattack consequences at a connected intersection? − A falsified red light countdown case study\",\"authors\":\"Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Zhixia Li ,&nbsp;Heng Wei ,&nbsp;Guohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;John E. Ash ,&nbsp;Kailai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication enhances traffic safety but is vulnerable to cyberattacks. Spoofing cyberattacks pose data falsification that endangers road users. Given that achieving high-level (L4-L5) automated driving still requires significant progress, understanding how and why human factors influence cyberattack consequences is novel yet essential for mitigating these risks. Research on this topic remains limited, and collecting driving behavior data under cyberattack conditions is challenging due to safety concerns. To address this, we conducted a driving simulator experiment with 32 drivers spanning a range of experience levels and other factors, replicating a connected intersection under no-attack and cyberattack scenarios. In-vehicle falsified red-light countdown spoofing attacks are designed to provide false information on the dashboard. Using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model, safety consequences were measured. Results indicate that cyberattacks pose significant threats to traffic safety. Greater speed at the end of the countdown period increases the risk of frontal (pedestrian and right-angle) collisions and reduces rear-end collision risks. Experienced drivers show lower hazards for frontal collisions. Notably, the total hazards under cyberattacks do not differ significantly between male and female drivers. Human factors affect safety by influencing driving behavior. Experienced drivers decelerate over shorter distances, reducing collision risk, while male and female drivers show similar deceleration patterns, resulting in comparable safety consequences. These findings provide a quantitative model describing human factors impacting cyberattack consequences, inform safer transportation management, and, more importantly, educate the public about cyberattacks. Future models can be developed to predict collision probabilities and improve system resilience (i.e., recovery after cyberattack).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003249\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

车辆与基础设施的通信提高了交通安全,但容易受到网络攻击。欺骗性网络攻击造成数据伪造,危及道路使用者。考虑到实现高级别(L4-L5)自动驾驶仍需要取得重大进展,了解人为因素如何以及为何影响网络攻击后果是新颖的,但对于减轻这些风险至关重要。关于这一主题的研究仍然有限,并且由于安全问题,收集网络攻击条件下的驾驶行为数据具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,我们对32名不同经验水平和其他因素的司机进行了驾驶模拟器实验,模拟了无攻击和网络攻击情况下的互联交叉路口。车载伪造红灯倒计时欺骗攻击旨在提供仪表板上的虚假信息。采用替代安全评估模型,测量安全后果。结果表明,网络攻击对交通安全构成重大威胁。在倒计时结束时,更快的速度会增加正面(行人和直角)碰撞的风险,降低追尾碰撞的风险。经验丰富的驾驶员显示正面碰撞的危险性较低。值得注意的是,男性和女性司机在网络攻击下的总危害没有显著差异。人为因素通过影响驾驶行为来影响安全。经验丰富的司机在较短的距离内减速,减少了碰撞风险,而男性和女性司机的减速模式相似,导致类似的安全后果。这些发现提供了一个定量模型,描述了影响网络攻击后果的人为因素,为更安全的交通管理提供信息,更重要的是,教育公众了解网络攻击。未来可以开发模型来预测碰撞概率并提高系统弹性(即网络攻击后的恢复)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How and why do human factors impact cyberattack consequences at a connected intersection? − A falsified red light countdown case study
Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication enhances traffic safety but is vulnerable to cyberattacks. Spoofing cyberattacks pose data falsification that endangers road users. Given that achieving high-level (L4-L5) automated driving still requires significant progress, understanding how and why human factors influence cyberattack consequences is novel yet essential for mitigating these risks. Research on this topic remains limited, and collecting driving behavior data under cyberattack conditions is challenging due to safety concerns. To address this, we conducted a driving simulator experiment with 32 drivers spanning a range of experience levels and other factors, replicating a connected intersection under no-attack and cyberattack scenarios. In-vehicle falsified red-light countdown spoofing attacks are designed to provide false information on the dashboard. Using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model, safety consequences were measured. Results indicate that cyberattacks pose significant threats to traffic safety. Greater speed at the end of the countdown period increases the risk of frontal (pedestrian and right-angle) collisions and reduces rear-end collision risks. Experienced drivers show lower hazards for frontal collisions. Notably, the total hazards under cyberattacks do not differ significantly between male and female drivers. Human factors affect safety by influencing driving behavior. Experienced drivers decelerate over shorter distances, reducing collision risk, while male and female drivers show similar deceleration patterns, resulting in comparable safety consequences. These findings provide a quantitative model describing human factors impacting cyberattack consequences, inform safer transportation management, and, more importantly, educate the public about cyberattacks. Future models can be developed to predict collision probabilities and improve system resilience (i.e., recovery after cyberattack).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信