Pooja Khurana, Raja Zirwatul Aida Binti Raja Ibrahim, Khatijah Omar, Azlinzuraini Binti Ahmad
{"title":"一线心理复原力:从大流行经验中吸取的教训。","authors":"Pooja Khurana, Raja Zirwatul Aida Binti Raja Ibrahim, Khatijah Omar, Azlinzuraini Binti Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic affected frontline Healthcare Workers (HCWs) immensely, subjecting them to extreme psychological distress. The current study assesses the burnout, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and resilience levels among HCWs and analyses the efficacy of institutional mental health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional longitudinal study design that combined quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was employed. There were 500 HCWs from public hospitals, private hospitals, primary healthcare centres, and emergency response teams who took part. Validated measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression were used in data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological distress was common, with 42.5 % burnout, 35.2 % anxiety, 29.8 % depression, and 21.4 % PTSD. Long hours (OR = 1.85, p < 0.001), high patient volume (OR = 1.67, p < 0.001), and absence of PPE (OR = 1.52, p = 0.002) were major contributors, and robust workplace support (OR = 0.75, p = 0.037) was protective. Qualitative interviews revealed key themes, including persistent sleep disturbances, Mental Health Support, Emotional and Social consequences, Impact on relationships and fear of infecting family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCWs experienced extreme psychological distress throughout the pandemic, which requires additional mental health policies, organizational support, and greater access to digital interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontline mental resilience: Lessons learned from the pandemic experience.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Khurana, Raja Zirwatul Aida Binti Raja Ibrahim, Khatijah Omar, Azlinzuraini Binti Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic affected frontline Healthcare Workers (HCWs) immensely, subjecting them to extreme psychological distress. The current study assesses the burnout, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and resilience levels among HCWs and analyses the efficacy of institutional mental health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional longitudinal study design that combined quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was employed. There were 500 HCWs from public hospitals, private hospitals, primary healthcare centres, and emergency response teams who took part. Validated measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression were used in data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological distress was common, with 42.5 % burnout, 35.2 % anxiety, 29.8 % depression, and 21.4 % PTSD. Long hours (OR = 1.85, p < 0.001), high patient volume (OR = 1.67, p < 0.001), and absence of PPE (OR = 1.52, p = 0.002) were major contributors, and robust workplace support (OR = 0.75, p = 0.037) was protective. Qualitative interviews revealed key themes, including persistent sleep disturbances, Mental Health Support, Emotional and Social consequences, Impact on relationships and fear of infecting family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCWs experienced extreme psychological distress throughout the pandemic, which requires additional mental health policies, organizational support, and greater access to digital interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frontline mental resilience: Lessons learned from the pandemic experience.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected frontline Healthcare Workers (HCWs) immensely, subjecting them to extreme psychological distress. The current study assesses the burnout, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and resilience levels among HCWs and analyses the efficacy of institutional mental health interventions.
Methods: A cross-sectional longitudinal study design that combined quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was employed. There were 500 HCWs from public hospitals, private hospitals, primary healthcare centres, and emergency response teams who took part. Validated measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression were used in data analysis.
Results: Psychological distress was common, with 42.5 % burnout, 35.2 % anxiety, 29.8 % depression, and 21.4 % PTSD. Long hours (OR = 1.85, p < 0.001), high patient volume (OR = 1.67, p < 0.001), and absence of PPE (OR = 1.52, p = 0.002) were major contributors, and robust workplace support (OR = 0.75, p = 0.037) was protective. Qualitative interviews revealed key themes, including persistent sleep disturbances, Mental Health Support, Emotional and Social consequences, Impact on relationships and fear of infecting family members.
Conclusion: HCWs experienced extreme psychological distress throughout the pandemic, which requires additional mental health policies, organizational support, and greater access to digital interventions.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.