联合ACL-PCL损伤预测MLKR后较差的预后:一年的工作、运动和肌肉恢复结果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Marion Ravelojaona, Gilles Bruyere, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Sylvain Grange, Thomas Neri
{"title":"联合ACL-PCL损伤预测MLKR后较差的预后:一年的工作、运动和肌肉恢复结果。","authors":"Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Marion Ravelojaona, Gilles Bruyere, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Sylvain Grange, Thomas Neri","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) can be severe despite modern treatment approaches. It is influenced by the severity of associated damage, lesion pattern, and the course of pre-, peri-, and postoperative management.The aim of our study was to compare multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR) cases involving both the ACL and PCL with those involving either the ACL or PCL in terms of one-year postoperative outcomes. Additionally, we assessed factors influencing outcomes at one year, functional and clinical results, as well as return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) at the one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that MLKR cases involving both the ACL and PCL would lead to poorer outcomes compared to those involving only one of the cruciate ligaments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients were included in the study between October 2019 and April 2023. Diagnosis was based on a 3 T MRI combined with clinical examination, and MLKI was classified according to the five-level Schenck classification. Anatomical ligament reconstruction was performed, followed by a structured postoperative physiotherapy program in a specialized reference center. Functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, KOOS, and Tegner, along with isokinetic muscle strength testing (quadriceps, hamstrings), VAS pain scores, and return to sport and work at the one-year follow-up. IKDC and KOOS scores were compared between patients with a single cruciate ligament injury (Schenck I) and those with both cruciate ligaments involved (Schenck > I). A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with poor outcomes at one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with only one cruciate ligament involved in the MLKR had better IKDC and KOOS at one-year post- operative in comparison with patients with both cruciate ligaments involved (p < 0.05). Age has a negative correlation with KOOS and IKDC (p < 0.05), Tegner has a positive correlation with KOOS (p < 0.05). All patients had a strength deficit in quadriceps and hamstring contraction at one-year post-operative compared to the uninjured knee. Mean KOOS was 72.1 ± 20.1 [19;100], mean IKDC was 71.1 ± 19.9 [18;95.4] and mean VAS was 1.6 ± 1.9 [0;8]. Return to work was observed in 89% (n = 64), and 76.4% (n = 55) returned to sports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined injuries involving both the ACL and PCL are associated with a poorer prognosis compared to isolated injuries of either ligament. At one-year follow-up, MLKR allows most patients to return to work; however, return to physical activity remains more uncertain. Residual strength deficits persist in both the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; Retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined ACL-PCL injuries predict poorer prognosis after MLKR: One-year results on work, sport, and muscle recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Henri Vermorel, Marion Ravelojaona, Gilles Bruyere, Antonio Klasan, Rémi Philippot, Sylvain Grange, Thomas Neri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) can be severe despite modern treatment approaches. It is influenced by the severity of associated damage, lesion pattern, and the course of pre-, peri-, and postoperative management.The aim of our study was to compare multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR) cases involving both the ACL and PCL with those involving either the ACL or PCL in terms of one-year postoperative outcomes. Additionally, we assessed factors influencing outcomes at one year, functional and clinical results, as well as return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) at the one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that MLKR cases involving both the ACL and PCL would lead to poorer outcomes compared to those involving only one of the cruciate ligaments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients were included in the study between October 2019 and April 2023. Diagnosis was based on a 3 T MRI combined with clinical examination, and MLKI was classified according to the five-level Schenck classification. Anatomical ligament reconstruction was performed, followed by a structured postoperative physiotherapy program in a specialized reference center. Functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, KOOS, and Tegner, along with isokinetic muscle strength testing (quadriceps, hamstrings), VAS pain scores, and return to sport and work at the one-year follow-up. IKDC and KOOS scores were compared between patients with a single cruciate ligament injury (Schenck I) and those with both cruciate ligaments involved (Schenck > I). A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with poor outcomes at one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with only one cruciate ligament involved in the MLKR had better IKDC and KOOS at one-year post- operative in comparison with patients with both cruciate ligaments involved (p < 0.05). Age has a negative correlation with KOOS and IKDC (p < 0.05), Tegner has a positive correlation with KOOS (p < 0.05). All patients had a strength deficit in quadriceps and hamstring contraction at one-year post-operative compared to the uninjured knee. Mean KOOS was 72.1 ± 20.1 [19;100], mean IKDC was 71.1 ± 19.9 [18;95.4] and mean VAS was 1.6 ± 1.9 [0;8]. Return to work was observed in 89% (n = 64), and 76.4% (n = 55) returned to sports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined injuries involving both the ACL and PCL are associated with a poorer prognosis compared to isolated injuries of either ligament. At one-year follow-up, MLKR allows most patients to return to work; however, return to physical activity remains more uncertain. Residual strength deficits persist in both the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; Retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管采用现代治疗方法,多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI)的预后仍然很严重。它受相关损伤的严重程度、病变模式以及术前、围手术期和术后治疗过程的影响。我们研究的目的是比较包括前交叉韧带和前交叉韧带的多韧带膝关节重建(MLKR)病例与只包括前交叉韧带或前交叉韧带的病例在一年的术后结果。此外,我们评估了一年后影响结果的因素,功能和临床结果,以及一年随访时重返工作(RTW)和重返运动(RTS)。假设:我们假设同时涉及前交叉韧带和前交叉韧带的MLKR病例比只涉及其中一条交叉韧带的病例预后更差。方法:在2019年10月至2023年4月期间纳入72例患者。诊断基于3t MRI结合临床检查,MLKI按照5级Schenck分级。进行解剖韧带重建,随后在专业参考中心进行结构化的术后物理治疗计划。使用IKDC、oos和Tegner评估功能结果,以及等速肌力测试(股四头肌、腘绳肌)、VAS疼痛评分,并在一年的随访中恢复运动和工作。比较单交叉韧带损伤(Schenck I型)和双交叉韧带损伤(Schenck > I型)患者的IKDC和oos评分。进行多变量分析以确定与术后1年不良预后相关的因素。结果:与双交叉韧带受累的患者相比,单交叉韧带受累的患者术后一年IKDC和kos更好(p结论:前交叉韧带和前交叉韧带的合并损伤与单韧带损伤相比预后更差。在一年的随访中,MLKR允许大多数患者重返工作岗位;然而,恢复体力活动仍不确定。股四头肌和腘绳肌的残余力量不足仍然存在。证据等级:III;回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined ACL-PCL injuries predict poorer prognosis after MLKR: One-year results on work, sport, and muscle recovery.

Background: The prognosis of multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) can be severe despite modern treatment approaches. It is influenced by the severity of associated damage, lesion pattern, and the course of pre-, peri-, and postoperative management.The aim of our study was to compare multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR) cases involving both the ACL and PCL with those involving either the ACL or PCL in terms of one-year postoperative outcomes. Additionally, we assessed factors influencing outcomes at one year, functional and clinical results, as well as return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) at the one-year follow-up.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that MLKR cases involving both the ACL and PCL would lead to poorer outcomes compared to those involving only one of the cruciate ligaments.

Methods: Seventy-two patients were included in the study between October 2019 and April 2023. Diagnosis was based on a 3 T MRI combined with clinical examination, and MLKI was classified according to the five-level Schenck classification. Anatomical ligament reconstruction was performed, followed by a structured postoperative physiotherapy program in a specialized reference center. Functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, KOOS, and Tegner, along with isokinetic muscle strength testing (quadriceps, hamstrings), VAS pain scores, and return to sport and work at the one-year follow-up. IKDC and KOOS scores were compared between patients with a single cruciate ligament injury (Schenck I) and those with both cruciate ligaments involved (Schenck > I). A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with poor outcomes at one year postoperatively.

Results: Patients with only one cruciate ligament involved in the MLKR had better IKDC and KOOS at one-year post- operative in comparison with patients with both cruciate ligaments involved (p < 0.05). Age has a negative correlation with KOOS and IKDC (p < 0.05), Tegner has a positive correlation with KOOS (p < 0.05). All patients had a strength deficit in quadriceps and hamstring contraction at one-year post-operative compared to the uninjured knee. Mean KOOS was 72.1 ± 20.1 [19;100], mean IKDC was 71.1 ± 19.9 [18;95.4] and mean VAS was 1.6 ± 1.9 [0;8]. Return to work was observed in 89% (n = 64), and 76.4% (n = 55) returned to sports.

Conclusion: Combined injuries involving both the ACL and PCL are associated with a poorer prognosis compared to isolated injuries of either ligament. At one-year follow-up, MLKR allows most patients to return to work; however, return to physical activity remains more uncertain. Residual strength deficits persist in both the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.

Level of evidence: III; Retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信