埃塞俄比亚贫血高发地区静脉血和针刺毛细血管血血红蛋白浓度的比较

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Desalegn Kuche, Masresha Tessema, Kaleab Baye, Zeweter Abebe, Ramadhani Noor, Teshome Assefa, Alemayehu Hussen, Meseret Woldeyohannes, Stanley Chitekwe, Barbara J Stoecker
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚贫血高发地区静脉血和针刺毛细血管血血红蛋白浓度的比较","authors":"Desalegn Kuche, Masresha Tessema, Kaleab Baye, Zeweter Abebe, Ramadhani Noor, Teshome Assefa, Alemayehu Hussen, Meseret Woldeyohannes, Stanley Chitekwe, Barbara J Stoecker","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Somali Regional State in Ethiopia. The purpose of the study was to compare haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations from venous and finger-pricked capillary blood using the HemoCue 301 as well as estimating anaemia prevalence. Participants were non-pregnant women of reproductive age (WRA), 18-49 years old (n = 884). Blood was collected by trained laboratory technologists using standard protocols. Venous blood was transferred from the EDTA-coated vacutainer to a HemoCue microcuvette. An automatic safety lancet was used to obtain capillary blood, and a microcuvette was filled with the third drop. Both venous and capillary blood were analysed immediately in the field using the same HemoCue analyser. The mean (±SD) Hb concentration was 11.6 ± 2.2 g/dL for venous blood and 11.4 ± 2.3 g/dL for capillary blood. The mean Hb difference was 0.2 ± 0.8 g/dL (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for altitude, anaemia prevalence was estimated. Both blood collection methods confirmed anaemia prevalence as a severe public health problem; the prevalence was 66.6% from venous and 70.7% from capillary blood. Using venous Hb as the standard, the sensitivity of capillary Hb was 94.9%, and its specificity was 77.5% in identifying anaemia. The differences in anaemia estimates using venous and capillary blood have the potential to impact both public health strategies and programme evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e70109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Haemoglobin Concentrations From Venous and From Finger-Pricked Capillary Blood in a Region With a High Prevalence of Anaemia in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Desalegn Kuche, Masresha Tessema, Kaleab Baye, Zeweter Abebe, Ramadhani Noor, Teshome Assefa, Alemayehu Hussen, Meseret Woldeyohannes, Stanley Chitekwe, Barbara J Stoecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mcn.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Somali Regional State in Ethiopia. The purpose of the study was to compare haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations from venous and finger-pricked capillary blood using the HemoCue 301 as well as estimating anaemia prevalence. Participants were non-pregnant women of reproductive age (WRA), 18-49 years old (n = 884). Blood was collected by trained laboratory technologists using standard protocols. Venous blood was transferred from the EDTA-coated vacutainer to a HemoCue microcuvette. An automatic safety lancet was used to obtain capillary blood, and a microcuvette was filled with the third drop. Both venous and capillary blood were analysed immediately in the field using the same HemoCue analyser. The mean (±SD) Hb concentration was 11.6 ± 2.2 g/dL for venous blood and 11.4 ± 2.3 g/dL for capillary blood. The mean Hb difference was 0.2 ± 0.8 g/dL (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for altitude, anaemia prevalence was estimated. Both blood collection methods confirmed anaemia prevalence as a severe public health problem; the prevalence was 66.6% from venous and 70.7% from capillary blood. Using venous Hb as the standard, the sensitivity of capillary Hb was 94.9%, and its specificity was 77.5% in identifying anaemia. The differences in anaemia estimates using venous and capillary blood have the potential to impact both public health strategies and programme evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面研究是在埃塞俄比亚的索马里区域州进行的。该研究的目的是使用HemoCue 301比较静脉和手指穿刺毛细血管血液中的血红蛋白(Hb)浓度,并估计贫血的患病率。参与者为未怀孕的育龄妇女(WRA), 18-49岁(n = 884)。血液由训练有素的实验室技术人员按照标准规程采集。静脉血从edta涂层真空容器转移到HemoCue微皿。用自动安全刺血针采集毛细血管血,用微筒注满第三滴。静脉血和毛细血管血立即在现场使用同一台HemoCue分析仪进行分析。静脉血Hb浓度平均值(±SD)为11.6±2.2 g/dL,毛细血管血Hb浓度平均值为11.4±2.3 g/dL。平均Hb差异为0.2±0.8 g/dL (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Haemoglobin Concentrations From Venous and From Finger-Pricked Capillary Blood in a Region With a High Prevalence of Anaemia in Ethiopia.

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Somali Regional State in Ethiopia. The purpose of the study was to compare haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations from venous and finger-pricked capillary blood using the HemoCue 301 as well as estimating anaemia prevalence. Participants were non-pregnant women of reproductive age (WRA), 18-49 years old (n = 884). Blood was collected by trained laboratory technologists using standard protocols. Venous blood was transferred from the EDTA-coated vacutainer to a HemoCue microcuvette. An automatic safety lancet was used to obtain capillary blood, and a microcuvette was filled with the third drop. Both venous and capillary blood were analysed immediately in the field using the same HemoCue analyser. The mean (±SD) Hb concentration was 11.6 ± 2.2 g/dL for venous blood and 11.4 ± 2.3 g/dL for capillary blood. The mean Hb difference was 0.2 ± 0.8 g/dL (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for altitude, anaemia prevalence was estimated. Both blood collection methods confirmed anaemia prevalence as a severe public health problem; the prevalence was 66.6% from venous and 70.7% from capillary blood. Using venous Hb as the standard, the sensitivity of capillary Hb was 94.9%, and its specificity was 77.5% in identifying anaemia. The differences in anaemia estimates using venous and capillary blood have the potential to impact both public health strategies and programme evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信