Dae-Hee Kim, Sang Hyun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Moo Hyun Kim, Dong-Ju Choi, Marcin Grabowski, Pawel Miekus, Tzung-Dau Wang, Ching-Pei Chen, Sungha Park
{"title":"一项评估阿齐沙坦美多索米和氨氯地平联合治疗单药控制不充分的轻中度原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性的III期随机对照试验","authors":"Dae-Hee Kim, Sang Hyun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Moo Hyun Kim, Dong-Ju Choi, Marcin Grabowski, Pawel Miekus, Tzung-Dau Wang, Ching-Pei Chen, Sungha Park","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled by AZM or AML monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III study (NCT05385770), patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with AZM 40/80 mg or AML 5/10 mg were randomized (1:1:1) to receive low-dose or high-dose AZM/AML combination therapy or continued monotherapy as control. Eligible patients completed a 4-week active run-in period before randomization. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 8 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 890 patients were randomized. AZM/AML combination therapy resulted in significantly greater reductions in mean sitting SBP compared with AZM or AML monotherapy across all dose groups. Least-squares mean reductions in mean sitting SBP at week 8 ranged from 5.2 to 9.0 mm Hg across all monotherapy nonresponder groups, with all comparisons showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure also favored combination therapy. Safety profiles were comparable across all treatment arms, with most adverse events mild or moderate in severity. No additional safety concerns were identified compared with monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>AZM/AML combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with either agent alone, even at maximum doses. Both low-dose and high-dose combinations were well tolerated. AZM/AML combination therapy may offer enhanced BP-lowering efficacy compared with other angiotensin II receptor blocker-based regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Monotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Dae-Hee Kim, Sang Hyun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Moo Hyun Kim, Dong-Ju Choi, Marcin Grabowski, Pawel Miekus, Tzung-Dau Wang, Ching-Pei Chen, Sungha Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled by AZM or AML monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III study (NCT05385770), patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with AZM 40/80 mg or AML 5/10 mg were randomized (1:1:1) to receive low-dose or high-dose AZM/AML combination therapy or continued monotherapy as control. Eligible patients completed a 4-week active run-in period before randomization. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 8 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 890 patients were randomized. AZM/AML combination therapy resulted in significantly greater reductions in mean sitting SBP compared with AZM or AML monotherapy across all dose groups. Least-squares mean reductions in mean sitting SBP at week 8 ranged from 5.2 to 9.0 mm Hg across all monotherapy nonresponder groups, with all comparisons showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure also favored combination therapy. Safety profiles were comparable across all treatment arms, with most adverse events mild or moderate in severity. No additional safety concerns were identified compared with monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>AZM/AML combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with either agent alone, even at maximum doses. Both low-dose and high-dose combinations were well tolerated. AZM/AML combination therapy may offer enhanced BP-lowering efficacy compared with other angiotensin II receptor blocker-based regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价阿齐沙坦-美多索米(AZM)与氨氯地平(AML)联合治疗对AZM或AML单药控制不充分的轻中度高血压患者的降压疗效和安全性。方法:在这项多中心、随机、双盲III期研究(NCT05385770)中,AZM 40/ 80mg或AML 5/ 10mg控制不充分的轻中度高血压患者随机(1:1:1)接受低剂量或高剂量AZM/AML联合治疗或继续单药治疗作为对照。符合条件的患者在随机分组前完成了为期4周的积极磨合期。主要终点是治疗8周后平均坐位收缩压(SBP)较基线的变化。结果:共890例患者被随机分组。在所有剂量组中,与AZM或AML单药治疗相比,AZM/AML联合治疗导致平均坐位收缩压显著降低。在所有单药治疗无反应组中,第8周平均坐位收缩压的最小二乘平均值降低范围为5.2至9.0 mm Hg,所有比较均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。降低平均坐位舒张压也有利于联合治疗。所有治疗组的安全性具有可比性,大多数不良事件的严重程度为轻度或中度。与单药治疗相比,没有发现额外的安全性问题。结论:对于单用任何一种药物控制不充分的轻中度高血压患者,即使在最大剂量下,AZM/AML联合治疗也比单药治疗更有效。低剂量和高剂量联合用药均耐受良好。与其他基于血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的方案相比,AZM/AML联合治疗可能提供更高的降压效果。
A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Monotherapy.
Purpose: To assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled by AZM or AML monotherapy.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III study (NCT05385770), patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with AZM 40/80 mg or AML 5/10 mg were randomized (1:1:1) to receive low-dose or high-dose AZM/AML combination therapy or continued monotherapy as control. Eligible patients completed a 4-week active run-in period before randomization. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 8 weeks of treatment.
Findings: A total of 890 patients were randomized. AZM/AML combination therapy resulted in significantly greater reductions in mean sitting SBP compared with AZM or AML monotherapy across all dose groups. Least-squares mean reductions in mean sitting SBP at week 8 ranged from 5.2 to 9.0 mm Hg across all monotherapy nonresponder groups, with all comparisons showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure also favored combination therapy. Safety profiles were comparable across all treatment arms, with most adverse events mild or moderate in severity. No additional safety concerns were identified compared with monotherapy.
Implications: AZM/AML combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with either agent alone, even at maximum doses. Both low-dose and high-dose combinations were well tolerated. AZM/AML combination therapy may offer enhanced BP-lowering efficacy compared with other angiotensin II receptor blocker-based regimens.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.