预测还是预防?护士与跌倒风险电子预警系统的互动。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Meriel McCollum, Yimei Wu, LeeAnna Spiva
{"title":"预测还是预防?护士与跌倒风险电子预警系统的互动。","authors":"Meriel McCollum, Yimei Wu, LeeAnna Spiva","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictive models using machine learning technology are increasingly being incorporated into electronic health records to support staff in risk assessment and prediction of adverse outcomes. There is little research available related to how this technology fits into the nursing workflow or its effects on nurse behaviors or actual patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from four medical/surgical units were examined to explore nurse interactions with the interruptive alerts produced by the model and their chronological relation to actual falls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1.5% of all admissions resulted in at least one fall, and 87.0% of admissions resulted in at least one fall alert being produced by the system. Most alerts (57.3%) were dismissed by the receiver using the Snooze to Review option, and 22.0% of alerts were shown to staff members other than the primary nurse caring for the patient. Most falls (89.3%) were preceded by an alert being shown to any staff member, but a smaller number of falls (38.7%) were preceded by an alert being shown to the primary nurse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most fall cases in this sample, the primary nurse caring for the patient had never been exposed to an alert. However, most alerts were dismissed by nurses using the Snooze to Review option. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between nurse exposure to interruptive alerts and associated actions taken by nursing staff to prevent falls. Machine learning technology should be carefully studied and optimized to suit the needs and workflow of the staff and patients it is intended to serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction or Prevention? Nurse Interactions with an Electronic Early Warning System for Fall Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Meriel McCollum, Yimei Wu, LeeAnna Spiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictive models using machine learning technology are increasingly being incorporated into electronic health records to support staff in risk assessment and prediction of adverse outcomes. There is little research available related to how this technology fits into the nursing workflow or its effects on nurse behaviors or actual patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from four medical/surgical units were examined to explore nurse interactions with the interruptive alerts produced by the model and their chronological relation to actual falls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1.5% of all admissions resulted in at least one fall, and 87.0% of admissions resulted in at least one fall alert being produced by the system. Most alerts (57.3%) were dismissed by the receiver using the Snooze to Review option, and 22.0% of alerts were shown to staff members other than the primary nurse caring for the patient. Most falls (89.3%) were preceded by an alert being shown to any staff member, but a smaller number of falls (38.7%) were preceded by an alert being shown to the primary nurse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most fall cases in this sample, the primary nurse caring for the patient had never been exposed to an alert. However, most alerts were dismissed by nurses using the Snooze to Review option. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between nurse exposure to interruptive alerts and associated actions taken by nursing staff to prevent falls. Machine learning technology should be carefully studied and optimized to suit the needs and workflow of the staff and patients it is intended to serve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用机器学习技术的预测模型越来越多地被纳入电子健康记录,以支持工作人员进行风险评估和预测不良后果。关于这项技术如何融入护理工作流程或其对护士行为或实际患者结果的影响的研究很少。方法:研究了来自四个医疗/外科单位的回顾性数据,以探索护士与模型产生的中断警报的互动以及它们与实际跌倒的时间顺序关系。结果:在研究期间,1.5%的入学学生至少有一次跌倒,87.0%的入学学生至少有一次跌倒警报。大多数警报(57.3%)被接收方使用“小睡回顾”选项驳回,22.0%的警报显示给照顾患者的主要护士以外的工作人员。大多数(89.3%)跌倒前向任何工作人员发出警告,但少数(38.7%)跌倒前向初级护士发出警告。结论:在本样本中的大多数秋季病例中,护理患者的主要护士从未接触过警报。然而,大多数警报都被护士使用“小睡回顾”选项驳回了。需要进一步研究以了解护士接触中断警报与护理人员为防止跌倒而采取的相关行动之间的关系。应该仔细研究和优化机器学习技术,以适应它所服务的员工和患者的需求和工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction or Prevention? Nurse Interactions with an Electronic Early Warning System for Fall Risk.

Background: Predictive models using machine learning technology are increasingly being incorporated into electronic health records to support staff in risk assessment and prediction of adverse outcomes. There is little research available related to how this technology fits into the nursing workflow or its effects on nurse behaviors or actual patient outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective data from four medical/surgical units were examined to explore nurse interactions with the interruptive alerts produced by the model and their chronological relation to actual falls.

Results: During the study period, 1.5% of all admissions resulted in at least one fall, and 87.0% of admissions resulted in at least one fall alert being produced by the system. Most alerts (57.3%) were dismissed by the receiver using the Snooze to Review option, and 22.0% of alerts were shown to staff members other than the primary nurse caring for the patient. Most falls (89.3%) were preceded by an alert being shown to any staff member, but a smaller number of falls (38.7%) were preceded by an alert being shown to the primary nurse.

Conclusion: In most fall cases in this sample, the primary nurse caring for the patient had never been exposed to an alert. However, most alerts were dismissed by nurses using the Snooze to Review option. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between nurse exposure to interruptive alerts and associated actions taken by nursing staff to prevent falls. Machine learning technology should be carefully studied and optimized to suit the needs and workflow of the staff and patients it is intended to serve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信