女性照顾者参与医疗服务以满足其个人医疗需求:范围审查

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah Martin, Lyndal C. Hickey, Anna Bornemisza, Louise K. Harms
{"title":"女性照顾者参与医疗服务以满足其个人医疗需求:范围审查","authors":"Sarah Martin,&nbsp;Lyndal C. Hickey,&nbsp;Anna Bornemisza,&nbsp;Louise K. Harms","doi":"10.1155/hsc/2778779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this scoping review is to map the extent, range and nature of literature pertaining to women caregivers and their engagement with healthcare for their personal healthcare needs. It is estimated that 3 out of 5 people will become caregivers at some stage throughout their life, with a large percentage of women (75%) being primary carers. Family or informal care has been the subject of extensive research in the past, demonstrating the physical and emotional health risks placed on caregivers. However, little is known about how women caregivers engage with healthcare services for their own health needs, a factor that could mediate or prevent these health outcomes. Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology was applied to identify relevant empirical, peer-reviewed studies across six databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocIndex, CINAHL, Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts. Searches were limited from January 2013 to May 2025. A total of 11,228 papers were screened, with 41 papers meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. Studies were primarily quantitative, with a focus on physical and mental health, and the comparison of caregiver to noncaregiver experiences. Three key categories/issues were identified in these studies: (1) a varying frequency of service use (higher, lower and no difference when compared with noncaregivers), (2) key engagement factors (with a focus on individual versus contextual factors), and (3) encounters with health professionals. Findings demonstrate that specific caregiving roles and healthcare system factors influence the way in which carers engage with healthcare services for themselves and have the potential to inform overall health outcomes through a lack of timely treatment or an increased likelihood of requiring healthcare. With women comprising the majority of caregivers, they face a heightened risk of exposure to these challenges, yet existing research overlooks their specific needs and experiences. Opportunities for new and innovative directions in research exist to address ongoing gaps and for the development of meaningful policy and intervention to support women caregivers more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/2778779","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women Caregivers’ Engagement With Healthcare Services for Their Personal Healthcare Needs: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Martin,&nbsp;Lyndal C. Hickey,&nbsp;Anna Bornemisza,&nbsp;Louise K. Harms\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/2778779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this scoping review is to map the extent, range and nature of literature pertaining to women caregivers and their engagement with healthcare for their personal healthcare needs. It is estimated that 3 out of 5 people will become caregivers at some stage throughout their life, with a large percentage of women (75%) being primary carers. Family or informal care has been the subject of extensive research in the past, demonstrating the physical and emotional health risks placed on caregivers. However, little is known about how women caregivers engage with healthcare services for their own health needs, a factor that could mediate or prevent these health outcomes. Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology was applied to identify relevant empirical, peer-reviewed studies across six databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocIndex, CINAHL, Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts. Searches were limited from January 2013 to May 2025. A total of 11,228 papers were screened, with 41 papers meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. Studies were primarily quantitative, with a focus on physical and mental health, and the comparison of caregiver to noncaregiver experiences. Three key categories/issues were identified in these studies: (1) a varying frequency of service use (higher, lower and no difference when compared with noncaregivers), (2) key engagement factors (with a focus on individual versus contextual factors), and (3) encounters with health professionals. Findings demonstrate that specific caregiving roles and healthcare system factors influence the way in which carers engage with healthcare services for themselves and have the potential to inform overall health outcomes through a lack of timely treatment or an increased likelihood of requiring healthcare. With women comprising the majority of caregivers, they face a heightened risk of exposure to these challenges, yet existing research overlooks their specific needs and experiences. Opportunities for new and innovative directions in research exist to address ongoing gaps and for the development of meaningful policy and intervention to support women caregivers more effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/2778779\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/2778779\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/2778779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一范围审查的目的是绘制的程度,范围和性质的文献有关的妇女护理人员和他们的个人医疗保健需求的参与。据估计,五分之三的人将在一生中的某个阶段成为照顾者,其中很大比例的妇女(75%)是主要照顾者。过去,家庭或非正式护理一直是广泛研究的主题,表明照顾者面临的身体和情感健康风险。然而,对于女性护理人员如何为自己的健康需求参与医疗保健服务知之甚少,这是一个可能调解或预防这些健康结果的因素。Arksey和O 'Malley的范围审查方法被应用于在六个数据库中确定相关的经验,同行评议的研究:MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocIndex, CINAHL, Web of Science和Sociological Abstracts。搜索仅限于2013年1月至2025年5月。共筛选论文11228篇,其中41篇符合纳入标准。研究主要是定量的,重点是身体和心理健康,以及照顾者和非照顾者经历的比较。在这些研究中确定了三个关键类别/问题:(1)不同的服务使用频率(与非护理人员相比,更高、更低和没有差异),(2)关键参与因素(关注个人因素与环境因素),以及(3)与卫生专业人员的接触。研究结果表明,特定的护理角色和医疗保健系统因素会影响护理人员为自己参与医疗保健服务的方式,并有可能通过缺乏及时治疗或增加需要医疗保健的可能性来告知整体健康结果。由于妇女占照顾者的大多数,她们面临这些挑战的风险更高,但现有的研究忽视了她们的具体需求和经历。在研究方面存在新的和创新方向的机会,以解决持续存在的差距,并制定有意义的政策和干预措施,更有效地支持妇女照顾者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Women Caregivers’ Engagement With Healthcare Services for Their Personal Healthcare Needs: A Scoping Review

Women Caregivers’ Engagement With Healthcare Services for Their Personal Healthcare Needs: A Scoping Review

The objective of this scoping review is to map the extent, range and nature of literature pertaining to women caregivers and their engagement with healthcare for their personal healthcare needs. It is estimated that 3 out of 5 people will become caregivers at some stage throughout their life, with a large percentage of women (75%) being primary carers. Family or informal care has been the subject of extensive research in the past, demonstrating the physical and emotional health risks placed on caregivers. However, little is known about how women caregivers engage with healthcare services for their own health needs, a factor that could mediate or prevent these health outcomes. Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology was applied to identify relevant empirical, peer-reviewed studies across six databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocIndex, CINAHL, Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts. Searches were limited from January 2013 to May 2025. A total of 11,228 papers were screened, with 41 papers meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. Studies were primarily quantitative, with a focus on physical and mental health, and the comparison of caregiver to noncaregiver experiences. Three key categories/issues were identified in these studies: (1) a varying frequency of service use (higher, lower and no difference when compared with noncaregivers), (2) key engagement factors (with a focus on individual versus contextual factors), and (3) encounters with health professionals. Findings demonstrate that specific caregiving roles and healthcare system factors influence the way in which carers engage with healthcare services for themselves and have the potential to inform overall health outcomes through a lack of timely treatment or an increased likelihood of requiring healthcare. With women comprising the majority of caregivers, they face a heightened risk of exposure to these challenges, yet existing research overlooks their specific needs and experiences. Opportunities for new and innovative directions in research exist to address ongoing gaps and for the development of meaningful policy and intervention to support women caregivers more effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信