通过C─H⋅⋅⋅⋅O氢键的电荷转移能稳定水中油滴吗?

IF 16.9
Ruoqi Zhao, Hengyuan Shen, R Allen LaCour, Joseph P Heindel, Martin Head-Gordon, Teresa Head-Gordon
{"title":"通过C─H⋅⋅⋅⋅O氢键的电荷转移能稳定水中油滴吗?","authors":"Ruoqi Zhao, Hengyuan Shen, R Allen LaCour, Joseph P Heindel, Martin Head-Gordon, Teresa Head-Gordon","doi":"10.1002/anie.202508145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oil-water emulsions resist aggregation due to the presence of negative charges at their surface that leads to mutual repulsion between droplets, but the molecular origin of oil charge is currently under debate. Although much evidence has suggested that ionic species must accumulate at the interface, an alternative perspective attributes the negative charge on the oil droplet to charge transfer of electron density from water to oil molecules. Although the charge transfer mechanism is consistent with the correct sign of oil charge, it is just as important to provide good estimates of the charge magnitude to explain emulsion stability and electrophoresis experiments. Here, we show using energy decomposition analysis that the amount of net flow of charge from water to oil is negligibly small due to nearly equal forward and backward charge transfer through weak oil-water interactions, such that oil droplets would be unstable and coalesce, contrary to experiment. The lack of charge transfer also explains why vibrational sum frequency scattering reports a blue shift in the oil C-H frequency when forming emulsions with water, which arises from Pauli repulsion due to localized confinement at the interface. Finally, unlike ions, neither charge transfer nor dynamic polarization can produce a finite conductivity needed to couple to electric fields that would explain electrophoretic mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":520556,"journal":{"name":"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)","volume":" ","pages":"e202508145"},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Charge Transfer Across C─H⋅⋅⋅O Hydrogen Bonds Stabilize Oil Droplets in Water?\",\"authors\":\"Ruoqi Zhao, Hengyuan Shen, R Allen LaCour, Joseph P Heindel, Martin Head-Gordon, Teresa Head-Gordon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anie.202508145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oil-water emulsions resist aggregation due to the presence of negative charges at their surface that leads to mutual repulsion between droplets, but the molecular origin of oil charge is currently under debate. Although much evidence has suggested that ionic species must accumulate at the interface, an alternative perspective attributes the negative charge on the oil droplet to charge transfer of electron density from water to oil molecules. Although the charge transfer mechanism is consistent with the correct sign of oil charge, it is just as important to provide good estimates of the charge magnitude to explain emulsion stability and electrophoresis experiments. Here, we show using energy decomposition analysis that the amount of net flow of charge from water to oil is negligibly small due to nearly equal forward and backward charge transfer through weak oil-water interactions, such that oil droplets would be unstable and coalesce, contrary to experiment. The lack of charge transfer also explains why vibrational sum frequency scattering reports a blue shift in the oil C-H frequency when forming emulsions with water, which arises from Pauli repulsion due to localized confinement at the interface. Finally, unlike ions, neither charge transfer nor dynamic polarization can produce a finite conductivity needed to couple to electric fields that would explain electrophoretic mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e202508145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202508145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202508145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油水乳液由于其表面存在负电荷,导致液滴之间的相互排斥,从而抵抗聚集,但油电荷的分子起源目前仍在争论中。尽管有很多证据表明,离子种类一定是在界面上积累的,但另一种观点认为,油滴上的负电荷是由于电子密度从水到油分子的电荷转移。尽管电荷转移机制与油电荷的正确标志一致,但提供电荷大小的良好估计对于解释乳液稳定性和电泳实验同样重要。在这里,我们通过能量分解分析表明,由于弱油水相互作用导致的正向和反向电荷转移几乎相等,因此从水到油的净电荷流量可以忽略不计,从而导致油滴不稳定并聚结,这与实验相反。电荷转移的缺乏也解释了为什么振动和频率散射报告说,当与水形成乳剂时,油的C-H频率会发生蓝移,这是由于界面上的局部约束造成的泡利排斥引起的。最后,与离子不同,电荷转移和动态极化都不能产生与电场耦合所需的有限电导率,这将解释电泳迁移率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can Charge Transfer Across C─H⋅⋅⋅O Hydrogen Bonds Stabilize Oil Droplets in Water?

Can Charge Transfer Across C─H⋅⋅⋅O Hydrogen Bonds Stabilize Oil Droplets in Water?

Oil-water emulsions resist aggregation due to the presence of negative charges at their surface that leads to mutual repulsion between droplets, but the molecular origin of oil charge is currently under debate. Although much evidence has suggested that ionic species must accumulate at the interface, an alternative perspective attributes the negative charge on the oil droplet to charge transfer of electron density from water to oil molecules. Although the charge transfer mechanism is consistent with the correct sign of oil charge, it is just as important to provide good estimates of the charge magnitude to explain emulsion stability and electrophoresis experiments. Here, we show using energy decomposition analysis that the amount of net flow of charge from water to oil is negligibly small due to nearly equal forward and backward charge transfer through weak oil-water interactions, such that oil droplets would be unstable and coalesce, contrary to experiment. The lack of charge transfer also explains why vibrational sum frequency scattering reports a blue shift in the oil C-H frequency when forming emulsions with water, which arises from Pauli repulsion due to localized confinement at the interface. Finally, unlike ions, neither charge transfer nor dynamic polarization can produce a finite conductivity needed to couple to electric fields that would explain electrophoretic mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信