学习型卫生保健社区:大规模整合研究与实践。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leif I Solberg, David Kurtzon, Elizabeth Cinqueonce, Glyn Elwyn, Steven P Dehmer
{"title":"学习型卫生保健社区:大规模整合研究与实践。","authors":"Leif I Solberg, David Kurtzon, Elizabeth Cinqueonce, Glyn Elwyn, Steven P Dehmer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The cost and quality problems of health care in the US have been aggravated by separate silos for research and care delivery that limit the pragmatic value of research questions and delay the implementation and spread of what is learned. We describe a variation on the learning health system concept that engaged various stakeholders in a single state to work together on simultaneous knowledge generation and dissemination built on research questions that arose from the user community.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified the 12 strategies used by the leaders of this project to develop and operationalize an observational study in a large sample of primary care clinics in Minnesota that had implemented care coordination as part of attaining certification as health care homes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collaboration included the state health department, a research institute embedded in a health system, the 5 main payers, a measurement/reporting organization, 42 care systems with 316 primary care clinics, patient partners, and national consultants. This community developed a research proposal for an observational study about how to improve care coordination in primary care. We describe how this collaborative implemented and disseminated the study findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By employing 12 strategies to answer questions that arose from the health care community, we opened a door between the 2 halves of the house of medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 Spec. No. 10","pages":"SP691-SP697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A learning health care community: integrating research and practice at scale.\",\"authors\":\"Leif I Solberg, David Kurtzon, Elizabeth Cinqueonce, Glyn Elwyn, Steven P Dehmer\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The cost and quality problems of health care in the US have been aggravated by separate silos for research and care delivery that limit the pragmatic value of research questions and delay the implementation and spread of what is learned. We describe a variation on the learning health system concept that engaged various stakeholders in a single state to work together on simultaneous knowledge generation and dissemination built on research questions that arose from the user community.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified the 12 strategies used by the leaders of this project to develop and operationalize an observational study in a large sample of primary care clinics in Minnesota that had implemented care coordination as part of attaining certification as health care homes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collaboration included the state health department, a research institute embedded in a health system, the 5 main payers, a measurement/reporting organization, 42 care systems with 316 primary care clinics, patient partners, and national consultants. This community developed a research proposal for an observational study about how to improve care coordination in primary care. We describe how this collaborative implemented and disseminated the study findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By employing 12 strategies to answer questions that arose from the health care community, we opened a door between the 2 halves of the house of medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 Spec. No. 10\",\"pages\":\"SP691-SP697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89795\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国医疗保健的成本和质量问题因研究和医疗服务的分离而加剧,这限制了研究问题的实用价值,并延迟了所学知识的实施和传播。我们描述了学习型卫生系统概念的一种变体,即在用户社区产生的研究问题的基础上,让不同的利益相关者在一个单一的状态下共同努力,同时产生和传播知识。研究设计:观察性研究。方法:我们确定了该项目的领导者使用的12种策略,以在明尼苏达州初级保健诊所的大样本中开发和实施一项观察性研究,这些诊所已将护理协调作为获得保健之家认证的一部分。结果:该合作包括州卫生部门、一个嵌入卫生系统的研究机构、5个主要付款人、一个测量/报告组织、包含316个初级保健诊所的42个保健系统、患者合作伙伴和国家顾问。这个社区提出了一项关于如何改善初级保健护理协调的观察性研究的研究建议。我们描述了这种合作是如何实施和传播研究结果的。结论:通过采用12种策略来回答来自卫生保健社区的问题,我们打开了医学房子的两半之间的一扇门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A learning health care community: integrating research and practice at scale.

Objectives: The cost and quality problems of health care in the US have been aggravated by separate silos for research and care delivery that limit the pragmatic value of research questions and delay the implementation and spread of what is learned. We describe a variation on the learning health system concept that engaged various stakeholders in a single state to work together on simultaneous knowledge generation and dissemination built on research questions that arose from the user community.

Study design: Observational study.

Methods: We identified the 12 strategies used by the leaders of this project to develop and operationalize an observational study in a large sample of primary care clinics in Minnesota that had implemented care coordination as part of attaining certification as health care homes.

Results: The collaboration included the state health department, a research institute embedded in a health system, the 5 main payers, a measurement/reporting organization, 42 care systems with 316 primary care clinics, patient partners, and national consultants. This community developed a research proposal for an observational study about how to improve care coordination in primary care. We describe how this collaborative implemented and disseminated the study findings.

Conclusions: By employing 12 strategies to answer questions that arose from the health care community, we opened a door between the 2 halves of the house of medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信