脊柱侧凸肩部平衡的解除:临床和放射学分析。

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nikhil Goyal, Siddharth S Sethy, Pratibha Bhatia, Vishal Verma, Saptarshi Barman, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal
{"title":"脊柱侧凸肩部平衡的解除:临床和放射学分析。","authors":"Nikhil Goyal, Siddharth S Sethy, Pratibha Bhatia, Vishal Verma, Saptarshi Barman, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Shoulder balance is an important parameter while assessing the scoliosis deformity from a patient as well as clinician's perspective following the treatment. While there is uniform consensus about the importance of shoulder balance in scoliosis patients, what constitutes shoulder symmetry is still debatable. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical parameters both for medial and lateral components of shoulder balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective database of scoliosis was reviewed. Patient demographics and radiological parameters, including radiographic shoulder height, clavicle angle, T1 tilt, first-rib angle, coracoid height difference, and clavicle rib intersection distance, were recorded. Shoulder angle, axillary angle, neck trapezius angle, lateral and medial shoulder height, axillary height, and neck height were recorded for clinical parameters by two independent observers. SRS-22r score was used for patient-reported outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>57 patients (AIS = 31, EOS = 26) were recruited. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was excellent for both radiographic and clinical parameters. Most of the radiological parameter had poor-to-moderate correlation with clinical parameters except Radiological Shoulder Height with Lateral Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) and First Rib Angle with Medial Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) having strong corelations. On comparing EOS and AIS patients for radiographic and clinical parameters correlation, no significant difference was found between two groups. First rib angle, neck trapezial angle, and neck height were significantly higher in medial shoulder imbalance group, while coracoid angle, radiological shoulder height, coracoid height difference, and shoulder angle were significantly higher in lateral shoulder imbalance group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that radiographic parameters could only partially reflect the clinical appearance of shoulders. In surgical planning of deformity correction, both medial and lateral components of shoulder balance should be taken into consideration for both radiological and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling shoulder balance in scoliosis: a clinical and radiological analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil Goyal, Siddharth S Sethy, Pratibha Bhatia, Vishal Verma, Saptarshi Barman, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Shoulder balance is an important parameter while assessing the scoliosis deformity from a patient as well as clinician's perspective following the treatment. While there is uniform consensus about the importance of shoulder balance in scoliosis patients, what constitutes shoulder symmetry is still debatable. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical parameters both for medial and lateral components of shoulder balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective database of scoliosis was reviewed. Patient demographics and radiological parameters, including radiographic shoulder height, clavicle angle, T1 tilt, first-rib angle, coracoid height difference, and clavicle rib intersection distance, were recorded. Shoulder angle, axillary angle, neck trapezius angle, lateral and medial shoulder height, axillary height, and neck height were recorded for clinical parameters by two independent observers. SRS-22r score was used for patient-reported outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>57 patients (AIS = 31, EOS = 26) were recruited. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was excellent for both radiographic and clinical parameters. Most of the radiological parameter had poor-to-moderate correlation with clinical parameters except Radiological Shoulder Height with Lateral Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) and First Rib Angle with Medial Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) having strong corelations. On comparing EOS and AIS patients for radiographic and clinical parameters correlation, no significant difference was found between two groups. First rib angle, neck trapezial angle, and neck height were significantly higher in medial shoulder imbalance group, while coracoid angle, radiological shoulder height, coracoid height difference, and shoulder angle were significantly higher in lateral shoulder imbalance group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that radiographic parameters could only partially reflect the clinical appearance of shoulders. In surgical planning of deformity correction, both medial and lateral components of shoulder balance should be taken into consideration for both radiological and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从患者和临床医生的角度评估脊柱侧凸畸形时,肩部平衡是一个重要的参数。虽然对脊柱侧凸患者肩部平衡的重要性有统一的共识,但肩部对称的构成仍有争议。该研究的目的是评估肩部平衡的内侧和外侧组成部分的影像学和临床参数。方法:回顾前瞻性脊柱侧凸数据库。记录患者人口统计学和放射学参数,包括胸片肩高、锁骨角、T1倾斜、第一肋骨角、喙高度差和锁骨肋相交距离。由两名独立观察员记录肩角、腋窝角、颈斜方角、肩外侧和内侧高度、腋窝高度和颈部高度的临床参数。SRS-22r评分用于患者报告的结果测量。结果:共纳入57例患者(AIS = 31, EOS = 26)。在影像学和临床参数方面,观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性都很好。除了放射学肩高与侧肩高的相关性(r = 0.6, p)外,大部分影像学参数与临床参数的相关性较差至中等(r = 0.6, p)。结论:影像学参数只能部分反映肩部的临床表现。在畸形矫正的手术计划中,应考虑到肩部平衡的内侧和外侧成分的放射学和临床参数。诊断性研究,III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unraveling shoulder balance in scoliosis: a clinical and radiological analysis.

Purpose: Shoulder balance is an important parameter while assessing the scoliosis deformity from a patient as well as clinician's perspective following the treatment. While there is uniform consensus about the importance of shoulder balance in scoliosis patients, what constitutes shoulder symmetry is still debatable. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical parameters both for medial and lateral components of shoulder balance.

Methods: A prospective database of scoliosis was reviewed. Patient demographics and radiological parameters, including radiographic shoulder height, clavicle angle, T1 tilt, first-rib angle, coracoid height difference, and clavicle rib intersection distance, were recorded. Shoulder angle, axillary angle, neck trapezius angle, lateral and medial shoulder height, axillary height, and neck height were recorded for clinical parameters by two independent observers. SRS-22r score was used for patient-reported outcome measure.

Results: 57 patients (AIS = 31, EOS = 26) were recruited. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was excellent for both radiographic and clinical parameters. Most of the radiological parameter had poor-to-moderate correlation with clinical parameters except Radiological Shoulder Height with Lateral Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) and First Rib Angle with Medial Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) having strong corelations. On comparing EOS and AIS patients for radiographic and clinical parameters correlation, no significant difference was found between two groups. First rib angle, neck trapezial angle, and neck height were significantly higher in medial shoulder imbalance group, while coracoid angle, radiological shoulder height, coracoid height difference, and shoulder angle were significantly higher in lateral shoulder imbalance group.

Conclusions: The results indicated that radiographic parameters could only partially reflect the clinical appearance of shoulders. In surgical planning of deformity correction, both medial and lateral components of shoulder balance should be taken into consideration for both radiological and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信