卡培他滨治疗胆道癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Syed Kashif Ali, Christy Thomas, Mahesh Rathod, Krishna Undela
{"title":"卡培他滨治疗胆道癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Syed Kashif Ali, Christy Thomas, Mahesh Rathod, Krishna Undela","doi":"10.1177/10781552251372874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCapecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug, has demonstrated promising activity in Biliary tract cancers (BTC), but its role in combination chemotherapy is still debated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, both alone and in combination, for treating BTC.MethodologyA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar from the inception to 25<sup>th</sup> June 2024 to identify the RCTs on capecitabine therapy among BTC patients. Fixed or Random-effects model was used based on heterogeneity identified by using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q test. Quality of the RCTs was evaluated by the modified JADAD scale and RoB-2.ResultsA total of six RCTs comprising 613 patients were included in the study. Pooled results showed no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (Mean Difference [MD]: 0.07, 95% CI: -1.32 to 1.46; P = 0.92) or overall survival (OS) (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -1.97 to 1.53; P = 0.80) between capecitabine therapy and the control group. No significant differences in adverse events (AEs), including hand-foot syndrome, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionCapecitabine did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit in PFS or OS for patients with BTC. The AEs from the capecitabine combination therapy were well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251372874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of capecitabine therapy in patients with Biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Kashif Ali, Christy Thomas, Mahesh Rathod, Krishna Undela\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552251372874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundCapecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug, has demonstrated promising activity in Biliary tract cancers (BTC), but its role in combination chemotherapy is still debated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, both alone and in combination, for treating BTC.MethodologyA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar from the inception to 25<sup>th</sup> June 2024 to identify the RCTs on capecitabine therapy among BTC patients. Fixed or Random-effects model was used based on heterogeneity identified by using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q test. Quality of the RCTs was evaluated by the modified JADAD scale and RoB-2.ResultsA total of six RCTs comprising 613 patients were included in the study. Pooled results showed no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (Mean Difference [MD]: 0.07, 95% CI: -1.32 to 1.46; P = 0.92) or overall survival (OS) (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -1.97 to 1.53; P = 0.80) between capecitabine therapy and the control group. No significant differences in adverse events (AEs), including hand-foot syndrome, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionCapecitabine did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit in PFS or OS for patients with BTC. The AEs from the capecitabine combination therapy were well-tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10781552251372874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251372874\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251372874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡培他滨是一种口服氟嘧啶前药,在胆道肿瘤(BTC)中显示出良好的活性,但其在联合化疗中的作用仍存在争议。目的评价卡培他滨单用和联用治疗BTC的疗效和安全性。方法系统检索PubMed、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(Central Register of Controlled Trials, Central)和谷歌Scholar数据库,从数据库建立之日起至2024年6月25日,筛选卡培他滨治疗BTC患者的随机对照试验。通过I²统计量和Cochran’s Q检验确定异质性,采用固定或随机效应模型。采用改良的JADAD量表和rob2评价rct的质量。结果共纳入6项随机对照试验,共纳入613例患者。汇总结果显示,卡培他滨治疗组与对照组在无进展生存期(PFS)(平均差异[MD]: 0.07, 95% CI: -1.32至1.46;P = 0.92)或总生存期(OS) (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -1.97至1.53;P = 0.80)方面无统计学差异。不良事件(ae)无显著差异,包括手足综合征、中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症。结论卡培他滨对BTC患者的PFS或OS没有统计学意义上的显著益处。卡培他滨联合治疗的不良反应耐受良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of capecitabine therapy in patients with Biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundCapecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug, has demonstrated promising activity in Biliary tract cancers (BTC), but its role in combination chemotherapy is still debated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, both alone and in combination, for treating BTC.MethodologyA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar from the inception to 25th June 2024 to identify the RCTs on capecitabine therapy among BTC patients. Fixed or Random-effects model was used based on heterogeneity identified by using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q test. Quality of the RCTs was evaluated by the modified JADAD scale and RoB-2.ResultsA total of six RCTs comprising 613 patients were included in the study. Pooled results showed no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (Mean Difference [MD]: 0.07, 95% CI: -1.32 to 1.46; P = 0.92) or overall survival (OS) (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -1.97 to 1.53; P = 0.80) between capecitabine therapy and the control group. No significant differences in adverse events (AEs), including hand-foot syndrome, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionCapecitabine did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit in PFS or OS for patients with BTC. The AEs from the capecitabine combination therapy were well-tolerated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信