更新无反应调整退伍军人事务部丧失亲人的家庭调查绩效措施。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ann Kutney-Lee, Dawn Smith, Daniel Kinder, Joshua M Thorpe
{"title":"更新无反应调整退伍军人事务部丧失亲人的家庭调查绩效措施。","authors":"Ann Kutney-Lee, Dawn Smith, Daniel Kinder, Joshua M Thorpe","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Declining response rates pose a threat to the validity of large surveys designed to measure quality of care. For over a decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs has evaluated the quality of end-of-life care delivered to Veterans using the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). The BFS Performance Measure (BFS-PM), derived from the BFS, is a widely used metric across the VA healthcare system that informs facility benchmarking and quality improvement efforts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this analysis was to develop and test an updated nonresponse adjustment model for the BFS-PM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis used BFS data linked with socio-demographic and clinical data available in VA's Corporate Data Warehouse for October 1, 2021-September 30, 2022. A direct inverse propensity weighting approach was applied to adjust for BFS nonresponse. Facility-level differences in BFS-PM scores were calculated before and after weighting to describe the effects of nonresponse adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample consisted of 14,510 Veteran decedents whose family member was eligible to receive a BFS, including 8,698 (59.9%) respondents and 5,812 (40.1%) nonrespondents. Across the 145 VA Medical Centers represented in the sample, the mean facility-level response rate was 40.1%. The mean change in the facility-level BFS-PM score from pre- to postweighting for nonresponse was 1.2% (standard deviation = 3.4%) and ranged from -11.2% to 11.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjustment for nonresponse bias in the calculation of facility-level BFS-PM scores continues to be an important and appropriate practice in the evaluation of quality of end-of-life care in VA inpatient facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated Nonresponse Adjustment for the Department of Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey Performance Measure.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Kutney-Lee, Dawn Smith, Daniel Kinder, Joshua M Thorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Declining response rates pose a threat to the validity of large surveys designed to measure quality of care. For over a decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs has evaluated the quality of end-of-life care delivered to Veterans using the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). The BFS Performance Measure (BFS-PM), derived from the BFS, is a widely used metric across the VA healthcare system that informs facility benchmarking and quality improvement efforts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this analysis was to develop and test an updated nonresponse adjustment model for the BFS-PM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis used BFS data linked with socio-demographic and clinical data available in VA's Corporate Data Warehouse for October 1, 2021-September 30, 2022. A direct inverse propensity weighting approach was applied to adjust for BFS nonresponse. Facility-level differences in BFS-PM scores were calculated before and after weighting to describe the effects of nonresponse adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample consisted of 14,510 Veteran decedents whose family member was eligible to receive a BFS, including 8,698 (59.9%) respondents and 5,812 (40.1%) nonrespondents. Across the 145 VA Medical Centers represented in the sample, the mean facility-level response rate was 40.1%. The mean change in the facility-level BFS-PM score from pre- to postweighting for nonresponse was 1.2% (standard deviation = 3.4%) and ranged from -11.2% to 11.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjustment for nonresponse bias in the calculation of facility-level BFS-PM scores continues to be an important and appropriate practice in the evaluation of quality of end-of-life care in VA inpatient facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:回复率的下降对旨在衡量护理质量的大型调查的有效性构成威胁。十多年来,退伍军人事务部一直在使用丧亲家庭调查(BFS)来评估退伍军人临终关怀的质量。BFS绩效度量(BFS- pm)源于BFS,是VA医疗保健系统中广泛使用的度量标准,可为设施基准测试和质量改进工作提供信息。目的:本分析的目的是开发和测试一种更新的BFS-PM无反应调整模型。方法:该横断面分析使用了VA公司数据仓库中2021年10月1日至2022年9月30日的BFS数据与社会人口统计学和临床数据相关联。采用直接逆倾向加权法对BFS无响应进行调整。加权前后计算BFS-PM评分的设施水平差异,以描述无反应调整的影响。结果:分析样本包括14510名符合领取BFS条件的退伍军人遗属,其中8698名(59.9%)受访者和5812名(40.1%)非受访者。在样本中代表的145个VA医疗中心中,平均设施级响应率为40.1%。设施级BFS-PM评分从加权前到加权后无反应的平均变化为1.2%(标准差=3.4%),范围为-11.2%至11.9%。结论:调整机构级BFS-PM评分计算中的无反应偏差仍然是评估VA住院机构临终关怀质量的重要和适当的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updated Nonresponse Adjustment for the Department of Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey Performance Measure.

Context: Declining response rates pose a threat to the validity of large surveys designed to measure quality of care. For over a decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs has evaluated the quality of end-of-life care delivered to Veterans using the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). The BFS Performance Measure (BFS-PM), derived from the BFS, is a widely used metric across the VA healthcare system that informs facility benchmarking and quality improvement efforts.

Objectives: The objective of this analysis was to develop and test an updated nonresponse adjustment model for the BFS-PM.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used BFS data linked with socio-demographic and clinical data available in VA's Corporate Data Warehouse for October 1, 2021-September 30, 2022. A direct inverse propensity weighting approach was applied to adjust for BFS nonresponse. Facility-level differences in BFS-PM scores were calculated before and after weighting to describe the effects of nonresponse adjustment.

Results: The analytic sample consisted of 14,510 Veteran decedents whose family member was eligible to receive a BFS, including 8,698 (59.9%) respondents and 5,812 (40.1%) nonrespondents. Across the 145 VA Medical Centers represented in the sample, the mean facility-level response rate was 40.1%. The mean change in the facility-level BFS-PM score from pre- to postweighting for nonresponse was 1.2% (standard deviation = 3.4%) and ranged from -11.2% to 11.9%.

Conclusion: Adjustment for nonresponse bias in the calculation of facility-level BFS-PM scores continues to be an important and appropriate practice in the evaluation of quality of end-of-life care in VA inpatient facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信