儿科以家庭为基础的姑息治疗和临终关怀:人群的特征和比较。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith
{"title":"儿科以家庭为基础的姑息治疗和临终关怀:人群的特征和比较。","authors":"Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice: Characterizing and Comparing the Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以家庭为基础的姑息治疗(HBPC)和临终关怀计划为患有复杂生命缩短疾病的儿童提供支持。然而,很少有关于HBPC和临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征和护理轨迹的比较,特别是在不同年龄组之间。目的:比较接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征,并确定这些人群之间的异同。方法:对2019年1月至2022年12月期间在单一地点接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的出生-21岁儿童进行回顾性队列研究。数据是手动从电子健康记录中提取的。统计分析包括对分类变量的描述性统计、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,以及对非正态分布的连续变量的Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:在113名参与者中,安宁疗护接受者较年轻(中位数为2岁vs. 7岁;p=0.033),更可能有肿瘤诊断,且在研究期间死亡率较高(69.6% vs. 22.1%)。结论:在儿童和年轻人中,接受HBPC和接受安宁疗护者之间存在显著差异,特别是在年龄、诊断和医疗保健利用方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice: Characterizing and Comparing the Populations.

Context: Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.

Objectives: To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Results: Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.

Conclusion: Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信