Kathrin Bausch, Benjamin Speich, Deborah R Vogt, Lars G Hemkens, Maeve Dreher, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Svetozar Subotic, Peter Ardelt, Piet Bossard, Thomas Hermanns, Nicole Bruni, Stephen Wyler, Lukas Prause, Sarah-Charlotte Merz, Christian Engesser, Jan Roth, Andreas F Widmer, Hans-Helge Seifert
{"title":"单剂量与3天抗菌素预防经尿道前列腺切除术或光选择性汽化:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验(CITrUS试验)。","authors":"Kathrin Bausch, Benjamin Speich, Deborah R Vogt, Lars G Hemkens, Maeve Dreher, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Svetozar Subotic, Peter Ardelt, Piet Bossard, Thomas Hermanns, Nicole Bruni, Stephen Wyler, Lukas Prause, Sarah-Charlotte Merz, Christian Engesser, Jan Roth, Andreas F Widmer, Hans-Helge Seifert","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Guidelines recommend single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate. As guideline adherence is low and 3-d AMP is given frequently, we aimed to assess the noninferiority of a single dose compared with 3-d AMP by comparing the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 30 d.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-dose Versus 3-day Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection or Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial (CITrUS Trial).\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Bausch, Benjamin Speich, Deborah R Vogt, Lars G Hemkens, Maeve Dreher, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Svetozar Subotic, Peter Ardelt, Piet Bossard, Thomas Hermanns, Nicole Bruni, Stephen Wyler, Lukas Prause, Sarah-Charlotte Merz, Christian Engesser, Jan Roth, Andreas F Widmer, Hans-Helge Seifert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Guidelines recommend single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate. As guideline adherence is low and 3-d AMP is given frequently, we aimed to assess the noninferiority of a single dose compared with 3-d AMP by comparing the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 30 d.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:指南推荐单剂量抗菌预防(AMP)用于经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和光选择性汽化(PVP)。由于指南依从性较低,且经常给予3-d AMP,我们旨在通过比较30 d内尿路感染(UTI)的发生率来评估单剂量与3-d AMP的非劣效性。方法:进行了一项双盲、多中心、随机、非劣效性试验,在分配到TURP和PVP的患者中比较单剂量与3-d AMP,假设临床诊断UTI的发生率为9%,非劣效性差为4.4%。主要发现和局限性:从预期的1574名患者中,招募了728名患者,并对621名随机患者进行了全面分析。本研究因招募延迟而初步中止,并进行探索性分析。单剂量AMP治疗后,11.0%(95%可信区间[CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300)的患者临床诊断为uti,而接受3-d AMP治疗的患者临床诊断为8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307)(组间差异2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%])。细菌支持的uti发生率较低,组间无差异(单剂量AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%];组间差异0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%])。不良事件罕见。结论和临床意义:在这项经尿道前列腺手术患者的随机试验中,11.0%的单剂量AMP和8.5%的3d AMP被诊断为uti。小于计划样本量排除了对任何一组有利的明确解释。基于症状和细菌的尿路感染诊断降低了总体发生率和组间差异。
Single-dose Versus 3-day Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection or Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial (CITrUS Trial).
Background and objective: Guidelines recommend single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate. As guideline adherence is low and 3-d AMP is given frequently, we aimed to assess the noninferiority of a single dose compared with 3-d AMP by comparing the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 30 d.
Methods: A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.
Key findings and limitations: From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.
Conclusions and clinical implications: In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.