{"title":"在资源有限的国家,左乙拉西坦对癫痫的影响。","authors":"Xin-Yi Choon, Pek-Jing Soh, Nur Athirah Hassan, Kheng-Seang Lim, Hong-Gee Lee, Si-Lei Fong, Zhi-Qian Ong, Xuen Yu","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High treatment costs remain a major barrier for people with epilepsy (PWE), leading to significant treatment gaps. At the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), levetiracetam (LEV) is sold at a retail price (self-paying), but some patients receive subsidization. This study aimed to study the impact of medication costs on adherence, dosing, and quality of life among self-paying versus subsidized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the medication adherence, dosing, and quality of life among patients prescribed LEV, incorporating the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS) and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 172 respondents, those under the subsidization scheme (86, 50%) had a higher mean maximum dose (2055.2 mg vs. 1688.4 mg, P=0.013) and were less likely to reduce LEV intake due to cost concerns (7.7% vs. 23.7%, P=0.021). In the self-paying group, more patients had low adherence (23.3% vs. 17.6%), the seizure-free rate was lower (22.1% vs. 29.1%), and the mean QOLIE-31 score was lower (60.5 vs. 62.4) than the subsidized group, but the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Financial support is crucial in optimizing LEV dosing and adherence, with subsidized patients receiving higher doses and being less likely to reduce intake due to cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Levetiracetam Cost on Epilepsy in a Resource-limited Country.\",\"authors\":\"Xin-Yi Choon, Pek-Jing Soh, Nur Athirah Hassan, Kheng-Seang Lim, Hong-Gee Lee, Si-Lei Fong, Zhi-Qian Ong, Xuen Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High treatment costs remain a major barrier for people with epilepsy (PWE), leading to significant treatment gaps. At the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), levetiracetam (LEV) is sold at a retail price (self-paying), but some patients receive subsidization. This study aimed to study the impact of medication costs on adherence, dosing, and quality of life among self-paying versus subsidized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the medication adherence, dosing, and quality of life among patients prescribed LEV, incorporating the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS) and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 172 respondents, those under the subsidization scheme (86, 50%) had a higher mean maximum dose (2055.2 mg vs. 1688.4 mg, P=0.013) and were less likely to reduce LEV intake due to cost concerns (7.7% vs. 23.7%, P=0.021). In the self-paying group, more patients had low adherence (23.3% vs. 17.6%), the seizure-free rate was lower (22.1% vs. 29.1%), and the mean QOLIE-31 score was lower (60.5 vs. 62.4) than the subsidized group, but the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Financial support is crucial in optimizing LEV dosing and adherence, with subsidized patients receiving higher doses and being less likely to reduce intake due to cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000656\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Levetiracetam Cost on Epilepsy in a Resource-limited Country.
Objectives: High treatment costs remain a major barrier for people with epilepsy (PWE), leading to significant treatment gaps. At the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), levetiracetam (LEV) is sold at a retail price (self-paying), but some patients receive subsidization. This study aimed to study the impact of medication costs on adherence, dosing, and quality of life among self-paying versus subsidized patients.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the medication adherence, dosing, and quality of life among patients prescribed LEV, incorporating the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS) and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31).
Results: Among the 172 respondents, those under the subsidization scheme (86, 50%) had a higher mean maximum dose (2055.2 mg vs. 1688.4 mg, P=0.013) and were less likely to reduce LEV intake due to cost concerns (7.7% vs. 23.7%, P=0.021). In the self-paying group, more patients had low adherence (23.3% vs. 17.6%), the seizure-free rate was lower (22.1% vs. 29.1%), and the mean QOLIE-31 score was lower (60.5 vs. 62.4) than the subsidized group, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Financial support is crucial in optimizing LEV dosing and adherence, with subsidized patients receiving higher doses and being less likely to reduce intake due to cost.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.