Sir-Lord Wiafe, Nana O Asante, Vince D Calhoun, Ashkan Faghiri
{"title":"用通信理论研究时间分辨功能连通性:论相位同步和滑动窗口Pearson相关的互补性。","authors":"Sir-Lord Wiafe, Nana O Asante, Vince D Calhoun, Ashkan Faghiri","doi":"10.1177/21580014251376733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Time-resolved functional network connectivity (trFNC) assesses the time-resolved coupling between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study aims to compare two techniques used to estimate trFNC, to investigate their similarities and differences when applied to fMRI data. These techniques are the sliding window Pearson correlation (SWPC), an amplitude-based approach, and phase synchrony (PS), a phase-based technique. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To accomplish our objective, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project with 827 subjects [repetition time (TR): 0.7 sec] and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network with 311 subjects (TR: 2 sec), which included 151 schizophrenia (SZ) patients and 160 controls. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our simulations reveal distinct strengths in two connectivity methods: SWPC captures high-magnitude, low-frequency connectivity, whereas PS detects low-magnitude, high-frequency connectivity. Stronger correlations between SWPC and PS align with pronounced fMRI oscillations. For fMRI data, higher correlations between SWPC and PS occur with matched frequencies and smaller SWPC window sizes (∼30 sec), but larger windows (∼88 sec) sacrifice clinically relevant information. Both methods identify a SZ-associated brain network state but show different patterns: SWPC highlights low anticorrelations between visual, subcortical, auditory, and sensory-motor networks, whereas PS shows reduced positive synchronization among these networks. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In sum, our findings underscore the complementary nature of SWPC and PS, elucidating their respective strengths and limitations without implying the superiority of one over the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":" ","pages":"300-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation.\",\"authors\":\"Sir-Lord Wiafe, Nana O Asante, Vince D Calhoun, Ashkan Faghiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21580014251376733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Time-resolved functional network connectivity (trFNC) assesses the time-resolved coupling between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study aims to compare two techniques used to estimate trFNC, to investigate their similarities and differences when applied to fMRI data. These techniques are the sliding window Pearson correlation (SWPC), an amplitude-based approach, and phase synchrony (PS), a phase-based technique. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To accomplish our objective, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project with 827 subjects [repetition time (TR): 0.7 sec] and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network with 311 subjects (TR: 2 sec), which included 151 schizophrenia (SZ) patients and 160 controls. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our simulations reveal distinct strengths in two connectivity methods: SWPC captures high-magnitude, low-frequency connectivity, whereas PS detects low-magnitude, high-frequency connectivity. Stronger correlations between SWPC and PS align with pronounced fMRI oscillations. For fMRI data, higher correlations between SWPC and PS occur with matched frequencies and smaller SWPC window sizes (∼30 sec), but larger windows (∼88 sec) sacrifice clinically relevant information. Both methods identify a SZ-associated brain network state but show different patterns: SWPC highlights low anticorrelations between visual, subcortical, auditory, and sensory-motor networks, whereas PS shows reduced positive synchronization among these networks. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In sum, our findings underscore the complementary nature of SWPC and PS, elucidating their respective strengths and limitations without implying the superiority of one over the other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"300-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21580014251376733\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21580014251376733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation.
Background: Time-resolved functional network connectivity (trFNC) assesses the time-resolved coupling between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study aims to compare two techniques used to estimate trFNC, to investigate their similarities and differences when applied to fMRI data. These techniques are the sliding window Pearson correlation (SWPC), an amplitude-based approach, and phase synchrony (PS), a phase-based technique. Methods: To accomplish our objective, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project with 827 subjects [repetition time (TR): 0.7 sec] and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network with 311 subjects (TR: 2 sec), which included 151 schizophrenia (SZ) patients and 160 controls. Results: Our simulations reveal distinct strengths in two connectivity methods: SWPC captures high-magnitude, low-frequency connectivity, whereas PS detects low-magnitude, high-frequency connectivity. Stronger correlations between SWPC and PS align with pronounced fMRI oscillations. For fMRI data, higher correlations between SWPC and PS occur with matched frequencies and smaller SWPC window sizes (∼30 sec), but larger windows (∼88 sec) sacrifice clinically relevant information. Both methods identify a SZ-associated brain network state but show different patterns: SWPC highlights low anticorrelations between visual, subcortical, auditory, and sensory-motor networks, whereas PS shows reduced positive synchronization among these networks. Conclusion: In sum, our findings underscore the complementary nature of SWPC and PS, elucidating their respective strengths and limitations without implying the superiority of one over the other.
期刊介绍:
Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic.
This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.