Yenjae Chang , Ki-Dong Kwon , Dae-Wook Kim , Man-Keun Kim , Moon Joon Kim
{"title":"2015年韩国干旱期间的节水补贴","authors":"Yenjae Chang , Ki-Dong Kwon , Dae-Wook Kim , Man-Keun Kim , Moon Joon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2025.100265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address water shortages arising from the 2015 drought in Korea, the water authority (K-water) implemented a water savings subsidy between October 2015 and January 2016. This policy incentivized reduced consumption by offering households a rebate for each unit of water saved compared to the same month in the previous year. The rate of subsidy was 1240 KRW/m<sup>3</sup> (<span><math><mo>≈</mo></math></span>$1.10/m<sup>3</sup>) which was roughly 2.5–3 times larger than the water rate for the first block in most of municipalities. This study attempts to measure the effectiveness of the intervention and finds that it generated a roughly 4%–6% reduction in water use. We find that households consuming relatively more water (3rd and 4th quartiles in terms of baseline water consumption) reduced their use by 6.1% but households consuming relatively less water (1st quartile) reduced their use by 4%. Interestingly, there is little evidence that property value affects the reduction in water use with the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water savings subsidy during 2015 drought in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Yenjae Chang , Ki-Dong Kwon , Dae-Wook Kim , Man-Keun Kim , Moon Joon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wre.2025.100265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address water shortages arising from the 2015 drought in Korea, the water authority (K-water) implemented a water savings subsidy between October 2015 and January 2016. This policy incentivized reduced consumption by offering households a rebate for each unit of water saved compared to the same month in the previous year. The rate of subsidy was 1240 KRW/m<sup>3</sup> (<span><math><mo>≈</mo></math></span>$1.10/m<sup>3</sup>) which was roughly 2.5–3 times larger than the water rate for the first block in most of municipalities. This study attempts to measure the effectiveness of the intervention and finds that it generated a roughly 4%–6% reduction in water use. We find that households consuming relatively more water (3rd and 4th quartiles in terms of baseline water consumption) reduced their use by 6.1% but households consuming relatively less water (1st quartile) reduced their use by 4%. Interestingly, there is little evidence that property value affects the reduction in water use with the intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428425000106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428425000106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Water savings subsidy during 2015 drought in Korea
To address water shortages arising from the 2015 drought in Korea, the water authority (K-water) implemented a water savings subsidy between October 2015 and January 2016. This policy incentivized reduced consumption by offering households a rebate for each unit of water saved compared to the same month in the previous year. The rate of subsidy was 1240 KRW/m3 ($1.10/m3) which was roughly 2.5–3 times larger than the water rate for the first block in most of municipalities. This study attempts to measure the effectiveness of the intervention and finds that it generated a roughly 4%–6% reduction in water use. We find that households consuming relatively more water (3rd and 4th quartiles in terms of baseline water consumption) reduced their use by 6.1% but households consuming relatively less water (1st quartile) reduced their use by 4%. Interestingly, there is little evidence that property value affects the reduction in water use with the intervention.
期刊介绍:
Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of:
Aquatic ecosystem services-
Blue economy-
Climate change and flood risk management-
Climate smart agriculture-
Coastal management-
Droughts and water scarcity-
Environmental flows-
Eutrophication-
Food, water, energy nexus-
Groundwater management-
Hydropower generation-
Hydrological risks and uncertainties-
Marine resources-
Nature-based solutions-
Resource recovery-
River restoration-
Storm water harvesting-
Transboundary water allocation-
Urban water management-
Wastewater treatment-
Watershed management-
Water health risks-
Water pollution-
Water quality management-
Water security-
Water stress-
Water technology innovation.