{"title":"埃塞俄比亚烧伤患者治疗效果差及其决定因素系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Mengistu Abebe Messelu , Baye Tsegaye Amlak , Tadesse Yirga Akalu , Getnet Nibret Alemie , Salelign Amlaku Matebe , Mamaru Getie Fetene , Bekele Getenet Tiruneh , Ashenafi Fekad Getahun , Makda Fekadie Tewelgne , Tadesse Miretie Dessie , Yasab Leykun , Temesgen Ayenew","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Burn continues to be a major public health problem, resulting in thousands of preventable deaths and disabilities each year. Therefore, this review and <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to assess the national prevalence of poor treatment outcome and its determinants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and has been registered with PROSPERO. A structured search of databases (Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, EMBASE, HINARI, and Web of Science) was undertaken. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. A <em>meta</em>-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. The I<sup>2</sup> statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity of studies, and to identify the possible causes of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and <em>meta</em>-regression were used. Egger’s test and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis included eight studies involving a total of 9255 burn patients. The pooled national prevalence of poor treatment outcome among burn patients in Ethiopia was 20.1 % (95 %CI: 14.14, 26.06). Regional subgroup analysis showed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome was 13.12 %, 29.24 %, 26.2 %, 25.6 %, and 12.37 % in Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nation Nationalities and People, and Addis Ababa, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on patients’ age revealed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome among adults and children was 18.87 % and 21.58 %, respectively. This <em>meta</em>-analysis demonstrated that being a rural resident (OR = 3.24, 95 % CI: 1.66, 6.33), malnourished (OR = 3.17, 95 % CI: 1.93, 5.19), extent of burn > 10 % of TBSA (OR = 2.60, 95 % CI: 1.73, 3.90), and didn’t get adequate fluid resuscitation (OR = 2.86; 95 % CI: 1.36, 6.00) were determinants of poor clinical outcome for burn patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and recommendations</h3><div>One in every five burn patients in Ethiopia had poor treatment outcome. Being a rural resident, malnourished, extent of burn > 10 %, and no getting adequate fluid resuscitation were significant predictors of poor treatment outcome. Special attention should be given to burn injured patients from rural area, malnourished, and with larger TBSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor treatment outcome and its determinants among patients with burn injuries in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mengistu Abebe Messelu , Baye Tsegaye Amlak , Tadesse Yirga Akalu , Getnet Nibret Alemie , Salelign Amlaku Matebe , Mamaru Getie Fetene , Bekele Getenet Tiruneh , Ashenafi Fekad Getahun , Makda Fekadie Tewelgne , Tadesse Miretie Dessie , Yasab Leykun , Temesgen Ayenew\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Burn continues to be a major public health problem, resulting in thousands of preventable deaths and disabilities each year. Therefore, this review and <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to assess the national prevalence of poor treatment outcome and its determinants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and has been registered with PROSPERO. A structured search of databases (Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, EMBASE, HINARI, and Web of Science) was undertaken. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. A <em>meta</em>-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. The I<sup>2</sup> statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity of studies, and to identify the possible causes of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and <em>meta</em>-regression were used. Egger’s test and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis included eight studies involving a total of 9255 burn patients. The pooled national prevalence of poor treatment outcome among burn patients in Ethiopia was 20.1 % (95 %CI: 14.14, 26.06). Regional subgroup analysis showed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome was 13.12 %, 29.24 %, 26.2 %, 25.6 %, and 12.37 % in Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nation Nationalities and People, and Addis Ababa, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on patients’ age revealed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome among adults and children was 18.87 % and 21.58 %, respectively. This <em>meta</em>-analysis demonstrated that being a rural resident (OR = 3.24, 95 % CI: 1.66, 6.33), malnourished (OR = 3.17, 95 % CI: 1.93, 5.19), extent of burn > 10 % of TBSA (OR = 2.60, 95 % CI: 1.73, 3.90), and didn’t get adequate fluid resuscitation (OR = 2.86; 95 % CI: 1.36, 6.00) were determinants of poor clinical outcome for burn patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and recommendations</h3><div>One in every five burn patients in Ethiopia had poor treatment outcome. Being a rural resident, malnourished, extent of burn > 10 %, and no getting adequate fluid resuscitation were significant predictors of poor treatment outcome. Special attention should be given to burn injured patients from rural area, malnourished, and with larger TBSA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25001077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25001077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Poor treatment outcome and its determinants among patients with burn injuries in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Burn continues to be a major public health problem, resulting in thousands of preventable deaths and disabilities each year. Therefore, this review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the national prevalence of poor treatment outcome and its determinants.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and has been registered with PROSPERO. A structured search of databases (Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, EMBASE, HINARI, and Web of Science) was undertaken. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. The I2 statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity of studies, and to identify the possible causes of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used. Egger’s test and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies involving a total of 9255 burn patients. The pooled national prevalence of poor treatment outcome among burn patients in Ethiopia was 20.1 % (95 %CI: 14.14, 26.06). Regional subgroup analysis showed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome was 13.12 %, 29.24 %, 26.2 %, 25.6 %, and 12.37 % in Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nation Nationalities and People, and Addis Ababa, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on patients’ age revealed that the pooled estimate of poor outcome among adults and children was 18.87 % and 21.58 %, respectively. This meta-analysis demonstrated that being a rural resident (OR = 3.24, 95 % CI: 1.66, 6.33), malnourished (OR = 3.17, 95 % CI: 1.93, 5.19), extent of burn > 10 % of TBSA (OR = 2.60, 95 % CI: 1.73, 3.90), and didn’t get adequate fluid resuscitation (OR = 2.86; 95 % CI: 1.36, 6.00) were determinants of poor clinical outcome for burn patients.
Conclusion and recommendations
One in every five burn patients in Ethiopia had poor treatment outcome. Being a rural resident, malnourished, extent of burn > 10 %, and no getting adequate fluid resuscitation were significant predictors of poor treatment outcome. Special attention should be given to burn injured patients from rural area, malnourished, and with larger TBSA.
期刊介绍:
International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care.
The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.