Sara D.C. Paz , Andreia S. Goncalves , Filipa Sampaio , Ana Paula Prata
{"title":"葡萄牙助产单位的实施:障碍和促进因素","authors":"Sara D.C. Paz , Andreia S. Goncalves , Filipa Sampaio , Ana Paula Prata","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.102096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Portugal, childbirth predominantly occurs in Obstetric Units, even for low-risk pregnancies, often resulting in excessive medical interventions. Midwifery Units, successfully integrated into health systems comparable to the Portuguese National Health System may be a viable alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study explores stakeholders’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Midwifery Units in Portugal.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative, descriptive-exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews for data collection.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Two overarching themes emerged: <em>implementation readiness</em> and <em>implementation strategies</em>. The first encompasses cultural, organizational, professional, and political dimensions. The second focuses on the professional positioning of midwifery in Portugal, its hierarchical relationship with other healthcare professions, and the structural characteristics of the health system.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The primary barriers to implementing Midwifery Units are deeply rooted in the prevailing physician-led maternity care model in Portugal. However, the current challenges within the National Health System, along with ongoing restructuring efforts, create an opportunity for change. Key facilitators include the aim of reducing unnecessary interventions, promoting humanized care, expanding women's autonomy in childbirth, and aligning practices with contemporary scientific evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study highlights that while structural and cultural barriers persist, a convergence of social, professional, and institutional facilitators may offer a strategic window for integrating Continuity of Midwife Care in Portugal. Tailored implementation strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and policy advocacy are required to translate existing evidence into national practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 6","pages":"Article 102096"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of midwifery units in the Portuguese context: Barriers and facilitators\",\"authors\":\"Sara D.C. Paz , Andreia S. Goncalves , Filipa Sampaio , Ana Paula Prata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.102096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Portugal, childbirth predominantly occurs in Obstetric Units, even for low-risk pregnancies, often resulting in excessive medical interventions. Midwifery Units, successfully integrated into health systems comparable to the Portuguese National Health System may be a viable alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study explores stakeholders’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Midwifery Units in Portugal.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative, descriptive-exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews for data collection.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Two overarching themes emerged: <em>implementation readiness</em> and <em>implementation strategies</em>. The first encompasses cultural, organizational, professional, and political dimensions. The second focuses on the professional positioning of midwifery in Portugal, its hierarchical relationship with other healthcare professions, and the structural characteristics of the health system.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The primary barriers to implementing Midwifery Units are deeply rooted in the prevailing physician-led maternity care model in Portugal. However, the current challenges within the National Health System, along with ongoing restructuring efforts, create an opportunity for change. Key facilitators include the aim of reducing unnecessary interventions, promoting humanized care, expanding women's autonomy in childbirth, and aligning practices with contemporary scientific evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study highlights that while structural and cultural barriers persist, a convergence of social, professional, and institutional facilitators may offer a strategic window for integrating Continuity of Midwife Care in Portugal. Tailored implementation strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and policy advocacy are required to translate existing evidence into national practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Birth\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Birth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519225002306\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519225002306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of midwifery units in the Portuguese context: Barriers and facilitators
Background
In Portugal, childbirth predominantly occurs in Obstetric Units, even for low-risk pregnancies, often resulting in excessive medical interventions. Midwifery Units, successfully integrated into health systems comparable to the Portuguese National Health System may be a viable alternative.
Aim
This study explores stakeholders’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Midwifery Units in Portugal.
Methods
A qualitative, descriptive-exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews for data collection.
Findings
Two overarching themes emerged: implementation readiness and implementation strategies. The first encompasses cultural, organizational, professional, and political dimensions. The second focuses on the professional positioning of midwifery in Portugal, its hierarchical relationship with other healthcare professions, and the structural characteristics of the health system.
Discussion
The primary barriers to implementing Midwifery Units are deeply rooted in the prevailing physician-led maternity care model in Portugal. However, the current challenges within the National Health System, along with ongoing restructuring efforts, create an opportunity for change. Key facilitators include the aim of reducing unnecessary interventions, promoting humanized care, expanding women's autonomy in childbirth, and aligning practices with contemporary scientific evidence.
Conclusion
The study highlights that while structural and cultural barriers persist, a convergence of social, professional, and institutional facilitators may offer a strategic window for integrating Continuity of Midwife Care in Portugal. Tailored implementation strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and policy advocacy are required to translate existing evidence into national practice.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.