基于设计认知冲突的产品属性识别与决策研究

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Hong-Yu Shao , Shi-Miao Zhang , Wei Guo , Jiang Sun , Lei Wang , Zhi-Xing Chang
{"title":"基于设计认知冲突的产品属性识别与决策研究","authors":"Hong-Yu Shao ,&nbsp;Shi-Miao Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Guo ,&nbsp;Jiang Sun ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Zhi-Xing Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the rapidly evolving technological market environment, the cognitive gap between users and product management teams is increasingly widening, and the design conflicts arising during product development significantly hinder the speed and accuracy of product iterations. Meanwhile, with the advancement of intelligent technologies, online communities have become key platforms where users express their experiences and perceptions of products. Therefore, efficiently uncovering users’ implicit cognition during the design process and analyzing the cognitive conflicts between users and product management teams are of great importance for improving product design and enhancing user satisfaction. Currently, product design and optimization rarely address conflict issues between users and product management teams from a cognitive science perspective. In this study, we propose a discriminative model based on design cognitive conflicts and utilize data from China’s largest automotive online community—Autohome—for analysis. By constructing an ICA model (Importance-Conflict Analysis Model), we identify key product attributes requiring focused improvement, and subsequently generate optimal product improvement solutions based on the CPT model (Cumulative Prospect Theory Model). Theoretically, this study defines the concept of design cognitive conflict and addresses the lack of focus on the perspective of product management teams in traditional product design. Practically, the research provides guidance for product management teams in forming psychological expectations and conducting effective product design and improvement throughout the design process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 103832"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on product attribute identification and decision-making based on design cognitive conflicts\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Yu Shao ,&nbsp;Shi-Miao Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Guo ,&nbsp;Jiang Sun ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Zhi-Xing Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the rapidly evolving technological market environment, the cognitive gap between users and product management teams is increasingly widening, and the design conflicts arising during product development significantly hinder the speed and accuracy of product iterations. Meanwhile, with the advancement of intelligent technologies, online communities have become key platforms where users express their experiences and perceptions of products. Therefore, efficiently uncovering users’ implicit cognition during the design process and analyzing the cognitive conflicts between users and product management teams are of great importance for improving product design and enhancing user satisfaction. Currently, product design and optimization rarely address conflict issues between users and product management teams from a cognitive science perspective. In this study, we propose a discriminative model based on design cognitive conflicts and utilize data from China’s largest automotive online community—Autohome—for analysis. By constructing an ICA model (Importance-Conflict Analysis Model), we identify key product attributes requiring focused improvement, and subsequently generate optimal product improvement solutions based on the CPT model (Cumulative Prospect Theory Model). Theoretically, this study defines the concept of design cognitive conflict and addresses the lack of focus on the perspective of product management teams in traditional product design. Practically, the research provides guidance for product management teams in forming psychological expectations and conducting effective product design and improvement throughout the design process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Engineering Informatics\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Engineering Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625007256\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625007256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在快速发展的技术市场环境中,用户与产品管理团队之间的认知差距日益拉大,产品开发过程中产生的设计冲突严重阻碍了产品迭代的速度和准确性。同时,随着智能技术的进步,网络社区已经成为用户表达体验和产品感知的重要平台。因此,有效地揭示用户在设计过程中的隐性认知,分析用户与产品管理团队之间的认知冲突,对于改进产品设计,提高用户满意度具有重要意义。目前,产品设计和优化很少从认知科学的角度来解决用户和产品管理团队之间的冲突问题。在本研究中,我们提出了一个基于设计认知冲突的判别模型,并利用中国最大的汽车在线社区汽车之家的数据进行分析。通过构建ICA模型(重要性-冲突分析模型),识别出需要重点改进的关键产品属性,并基于CPT模型(累积前景理论模型)生成最优产品改进方案。从理论上讲,本研究定义了设计认知冲突的概念,并解决了传统产品设计中缺乏对产品管理团队视角的关注。在实践上,本研究为产品管理团队在整个设计过程中形成心理期望,进行有效的产品设计和改进提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on product attribute identification and decision-making based on design cognitive conflicts
In the rapidly evolving technological market environment, the cognitive gap between users and product management teams is increasingly widening, and the design conflicts arising during product development significantly hinder the speed and accuracy of product iterations. Meanwhile, with the advancement of intelligent technologies, online communities have become key platforms where users express their experiences and perceptions of products. Therefore, efficiently uncovering users’ implicit cognition during the design process and analyzing the cognitive conflicts between users and product management teams are of great importance for improving product design and enhancing user satisfaction. Currently, product design and optimization rarely address conflict issues between users and product management teams from a cognitive science perspective. In this study, we propose a discriminative model based on design cognitive conflicts and utilize data from China’s largest automotive online community—Autohome—for analysis. By constructing an ICA model (Importance-Conflict Analysis Model), we identify key product attributes requiring focused improvement, and subsequently generate optimal product improvement solutions based on the CPT model (Cumulative Prospect Theory Model). Theoretically, this study defines the concept of design cognitive conflict and addresses the lack of focus on the perspective of product management teams in traditional product design. Practically, the research provides guidance for product management teams in forming psychological expectations and conducting effective product design and improvement throughout the design process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信