Fernando González-Roca , Julio A. Vásquez , Stefan Gelcich , Ángel Pérez-Ruzafa
{"title":"当面对假想的未来情景时,管理制度会影响智利海带渔民的反应","authors":"Fernando González-Roca , Julio A. Vásquez , Stefan Gelcich , Ángel Pérez-Ruzafa","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Co-management of kelp resources in northern Chile involves diverse access regimes that could influence artisanal fishers’ responses to economic, environmental, and social changes. This study analyzes the responses of 126 fishers from 25 coastal associations in the Atacama and Coquimbo regions to three hypothetical scenarios: a significant drop in kelp prices, environmental impacts from El Niño, and increased illegal activity. The research uses surveys, contingency tables, and multinomial logistic regression to explore the socio-economic characteristics and response strategies of fishers within different management regimes, such as Regional Management Plans (MP) and Management and Exploitation Areas for Benthic Resources (MEABR). Results indicate that migratory status, resource dependence, and management regime in which they operate significantly influence fishers’ decisions. Particularly, MEABR affiliates are more likely to adopt conservation-oriented actions compared to those under MP when faced with the three types of shocks. This study contributes insights on critical variables which can be tailored to refine co-management policies to better accommodate future possible ecological and socio-economic changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management regimes influence the response of Chilean kelp fishers when facing hypothetical future scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Fernando González-Roca , Julio A. Vásquez , Stefan Gelcich , Ángel Pérez-Ruzafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Co-management of kelp resources in northern Chile involves diverse access regimes that could influence artisanal fishers’ responses to economic, environmental, and social changes. This study analyzes the responses of 126 fishers from 25 coastal associations in the Atacama and Coquimbo regions to three hypothetical scenarios: a significant drop in kelp prices, environmental impacts from El Niño, and increased illegal activity. The research uses surveys, contingency tables, and multinomial logistic regression to explore the socio-economic characteristics and response strategies of fishers within different management regimes, such as Regional Management Plans (MP) and Management and Exploitation Areas for Benthic Resources (MEABR). Results indicate that migratory status, resource dependence, and management regime in which they operate significantly influence fishers’ decisions. Particularly, MEABR affiliates are more likely to adopt conservation-oriented actions compared to those under MP when faced with the three types of shocks. This study contributes insights on critical variables which can be tailored to refine co-management policies to better accommodate future possible ecological and socio-economic changes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management regimes influence the response of Chilean kelp fishers when facing hypothetical future scenarios
Co-management of kelp resources in northern Chile involves diverse access regimes that could influence artisanal fishers’ responses to economic, environmental, and social changes. This study analyzes the responses of 126 fishers from 25 coastal associations in the Atacama and Coquimbo regions to three hypothetical scenarios: a significant drop in kelp prices, environmental impacts from El Niño, and increased illegal activity. The research uses surveys, contingency tables, and multinomial logistic regression to explore the socio-economic characteristics and response strategies of fishers within different management regimes, such as Regional Management Plans (MP) and Management and Exploitation Areas for Benthic Resources (MEABR). Results indicate that migratory status, resource dependence, and management regime in which they operate significantly influence fishers’ decisions. Particularly, MEABR affiliates are more likely to adopt conservation-oriented actions compared to those under MP when faced with the three types of shocks. This study contributes insights on critical variables which can be tailored to refine co-management policies to better accommodate future possible ecological and socio-economic changes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.