Jessica Bell Rizzolo , Hubert Cheung , Jovy Y.S. Chan
{"title":"《公约》所列物种在香港中药中的可替代性","authors":"Jessica Bell Rizzolo , Hubert Cheung , Jovy Y.S. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substitutability of CITES-listed species in traditional Chinese medicine amongst the general public in Hong Kong\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Bell Rizzolo , Hubert Cheung , Jovy Y.S. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500247X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500247X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Substitutability of CITES-listed species in traditional Chinese medicine amongst the general public in Hong Kong
While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.