《公约》所列物种在香港中药中的可替代性

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jessica Bell Rizzolo , Hubert Cheung , Jovy Y.S. Chan
{"title":"《公约》所列物种在香港中药中的可替代性","authors":"Jessica Bell Rizzolo ,&nbsp;Hubert Cheung ,&nbsp;Jovy Y.S. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substitutability of CITES-listed species in traditional Chinese medicine amongst the general public in Hong Kong\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Bell Rizzolo ,&nbsp;Hubert Cheung ,&nbsp;Jovy Y.S. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500247X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500247X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然中药中使用的大多数药用成分来自植物,但使用来自受威胁和濒危物种的动物药物引起了人们对保护的重大关注。我们于2023年在香港进行了一项以人口为基础的样本(n = 1556)的定量调查。除了收集有关中医态度和使用的基线数据外,我们还使用了一项实验性小问卷调查来评估接受五种产品替代品的意愿:a)虎骨,b)熊胆,c) tokay壁虎,d)海马,e)赛加羚羊角。我们研究了对替代品的接受程度如何受到五个因素的影响:价格、原始产品的合法性、替代品的类型(家畜、合成或植物基)、替代品的可获得性以及物种的保护状况。72.1%的受访者认为中药是有效的,28.7%的受访者将野生动物补充剂作为中药的一部分。然而,合成和植物性中药补充剂的使用率高于野生动物补充剂,过去的替代品消费量从中等(赛加羚羊34.6%)到高(海马61.9%)不等。在逻辑回归模型中,增加可替代性接受度的因素因物种而异。对于熊胆和壁虎来说,有一个容易获得的替代品增加了可替代性。对于虎骨,野生虎的保护状况影响了其可替代性。价格对赛加羚羊和海马来说都是重要的因素。我们将讨论如何为特定产品量身定制的方法,以及对中药的原有态度,以提高中药的可持续性和保护香港的cites列入物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Substitutability of CITES-listed species in traditional Chinese medicine amongst the general public in Hong Kong
While most medicinal ingredients used in TCM are derived from plants, the use of animal-based medicines from threatened and endangered species has raised significant conservation concerns. We conducted a quantitative survey in 2023 with a population-based sample (n = 1556) in Hong Kong. In addition to gathering baseline data about TCM attitudes and use, we used an experimental vignette survey to assess the willingness to accept substitutes for five products: a) tiger bone, b) bear bile, c) tokay gecko, d) seahorse, and e) saiga antelope horn. We examined how acceptance for substitutes is impacted by the combination of five factors: price, the legality of the original product, the type of substitute (domestic animal, synthetic, or plant-based), availability of the substitute, and conservation status of the species. 72.1 % of respondents believed that TCM is effective and 28.7 % used wildlife supplements as part of TCM. However, the use of synthetic and plant-based TCM supplements was higher than that of wildlife-based ones, and past consumption of substitutes ranged from moderate (34.6 % for saiga) to high (61.9 % for seahorse). In logistic regression models, factors that increased substitutability acceptance differed by species. For bear bile and tokay gecko, having an easily available substitute increased substitutability. For tiger bone, the conservation status of wild tigers impacted substitutability. Price was a significant factor for both saiga and seahorse. We discuss how approaches tailored to specific products, as well as preexistent attitudes towards TCM, can increase the sustainability of TCM and the protection of CITES-listed species in Hong Kong.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信