在美国实施全州扫盲和特殊教育培训:一种混合方法评估

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Deborah K. Reed, Anna S. Gibbs, Julie K. Owens
{"title":"在美国实施全州扫盲和特殊教育培训:一种混合方法评估","authors":"Deborah K. Reed,&nbsp;Anna S. Gibbs,&nbsp;Julie K. Owens","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing statewide literacy and special education training in the U.S.: A mixed-methods evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Deborah K. Reed,&nbsp;Anna S. Gibbs,&nbsp;Julie K. Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500179X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500179X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决在大规模实施教育者准备计划(EPP)改革方面的知识差距,这项混合方法研究从美国一个州的教师那里收集了数据,以了解他们对遵守新立法和实施国家为未来的K-5扫盲和特殊教育教师和领导者提供的培训模块的看法和经验。在该州的40个epp中,收集了188份调查回复和24个焦点小组参与者的评论。教师普遍同意政策目标,并赞赏模块内容的证据基础。然而,他们建议提高学生的参与度,并提供更多的实施指导和工具。总体而言,数据表明缺乏系统的实施规划,这可能会阻碍改革努力。讨论了大规模实施政策的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing statewide literacy and special education training in the U.S.: A mixed-methods evaluation
To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信