{"title":"资优教育协调员的创新:顺序转换混合方法研究","authors":"Celeste D.C. Sodergren , Beatrice R. Buentello","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gifted education coordinators (GECs) are called upon to transform programs in their districts to overcome long-standing racial and socio-economic disparities in identification and services (Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022). This is only possible if the gifted coordinator believes themselves to be capable of leading change and persists through the difficulties of implementation. The purpose of this study is to understand how GECs believe they can innovate within their districts and the impact those beliefs have on their patterns of practice, and what other factors contribute to innovative action. The design is a sequential transformational mixed method design with two phases and three distinct points of integration. First, we distributed a survey including scales for innovation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE). Then we plotted the ESE score and innovative depth scores in a scatterplot and purposively sampled participants for phase two interviews from each quadrant. Second, we used the results of the phase one survey to adjust the interview protocol for phase two, and used the qualitative responses of each selected participant in the protocol as anchoring prompts. The final point of integration is in the analysis and meta-question, which includes an integrated data display. We found that leadership experience positively predicted ESE, and ESE positively predicted innovation. Through the transformation and integration of data, descriptions of each quadrant reveal relevant points of interest for preparing and supporting GECs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation in gifted education coordinators: A sequential transformational mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Celeste D.C. Sodergren , Beatrice R. Buentello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gifted education coordinators (GECs) are called upon to transform programs in their districts to overcome long-standing racial and socio-economic disparities in identification and services (Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022). This is only possible if the gifted coordinator believes themselves to be capable of leading change and persists through the difficulties of implementation. The purpose of this study is to understand how GECs believe they can innovate within their districts and the impact those beliefs have on their patterns of practice, and what other factors contribute to innovative action. The design is a sequential transformational mixed method design with two phases and three distinct points of integration. First, we distributed a survey including scales for innovation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE). Then we plotted the ESE score and innovative depth scores in a scatterplot and purposively sampled participants for phase two interviews from each quadrant. Second, we used the results of the phase one survey to adjust the interview protocol for phase two, and used the qualitative responses of each selected participant in the protocol as anchoring prompts. The final point of integration is in the analysis and meta-question, which includes an integrated data display. We found that leadership experience positively predicted ESE, and ESE positively predicted innovation. Through the transformation and integration of data, descriptions of each quadrant reveal relevant points of interest for preparing and supporting GECs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
资优教育协调员(gec)被要求改变其所在地区的项目,以克服在识别和服务方面长期存在的种族和社会经济差异(Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022)。这只有在天才协调员相信自己有能力领导变革并坚持克服实施困难的情况下才有可能。本研究的目的是了解gec如何相信他们可以在他们的区域内进行创新,以及这些信念对他们的实践模式的影响,以及哪些其他因素有助于创新行动。该设计是一个连续的转换混合方法设计,有两个阶段和三个不同的集成点。首先,我们分发了一份包括创新和创业自我效能(ESE)量表的调查。然后,我们在散点图中绘制了ESE分数和创新深度分数,并有目的地从每个象限中抽样参与者进行第二阶段访谈。其次,我们使用第一阶段调查的结果来调整第二阶段的访谈协议,并使用每个被选中的参与者在协议中的定性回答作为锚定提示。集成的最后一点是分析和元问题,其中包括集成的数据显示。我们发现领导经验正向预测ESE,而ESE正向预测创新。通过数据的转换和集成,每个象限的描述揭示了准备和支持gec的相关兴趣点。
Innovation in gifted education coordinators: A sequential transformational mixed methods study
Gifted education coordinators (GECs) are called upon to transform programs in their districts to overcome long-standing racial and socio-economic disparities in identification and services (Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022). This is only possible if the gifted coordinator believes themselves to be capable of leading change and persists through the difficulties of implementation. The purpose of this study is to understand how GECs believe they can innovate within their districts and the impact those beliefs have on their patterns of practice, and what other factors contribute to innovative action. The design is a sequential transformational mixed method design with two phases and three distinct points of integration. First, we distributed a survey including scales for innovation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE). Then we plotted the ESE score and innovative depth scores in a scatterplot and purposively sampled participants for phase two interviews from each quadrant. Second, we used the results of the phase one survey to adjust the interview protocol for phase two, and used the qualitative responses of each selected participant in the protocol as anchoring prompts. The final point of integration is in the analysis and meta-question, which includes an integrated data display. We found that leadership experience positively predicted ESE, and ESE positively predicted innovation. Through the transformation and integration of data, descriptions of each quadrant reveal relevant points of interest for preparing and supporting GECs.