{"title":"从空间感知人类健康:应用和大数据平台评估","authors":"Dhritiraj Sengupta , Filipe Girbal Brandão , Shubha Sathyendranath , Gemma Kulk , Annamaria Conte , Carla Ippoliti , Luca Candeloro , Monica Bucciarelli , David Moffat , William Wint , Marcello Maranesi , Raffaele Scarano , Joao Vitorino , Gunnar Brandt , Tejas Morbagal Harish","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of Earth Observation (EO) into human health research has expanded significantly, particularly since 2009, highlighting its potential for disease modelling, environmental exposure assessment, and public health decision-making. This review explores the evolving role of EO in health applications through a bibliometric analysis of 1751 research documents retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. These documents were selected using targeted keywords and after excluding non-primary literature such as reviews, editorials, and meeting abstracts. Findings revealed a substantial increase in EO-health research outputs, growing from 2 publications in 1991 to 266 in 2024, with a notable surge beginning in 2009. More than 65 % of the selected studies contributed to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on Climate Action, followed by SDG 3 on Good Health and Wellbeing (<em>n</em> = 994) and SDG 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities (<em>n</em> = 980), illustrating EO's cross-cutting relevance. Despite this growth, the field remains fragmented due to inconsistent data formats, limited accessibility, and weak interdisciplinary collaboration. A key challenge is the persistent divide between EO data producers and health practitioners, which hampers the effective translation of EO insights into practice. This review highlights the importance of co-production approaches that bring together researchers, policymakers, and communities to address these barriers. By promoting standardisation, enhancing data interoperability, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, EO can be more effectively leveraged to support disease surveillance, environmental health monitoring, and evidence-based policy interventions aligned with global health and sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensing human health from Space: An assessment of applications and big data platforms\",\"authors\":\"Dhritiraj Sengupta , Filipe Girbal Brandão , Shubha Sathyendranath , Gemma Kulk , Annamaria Conte , Carla Ippoliti , Luca Candeloro , Monica Bucciarelli , David Moffat , William Wint , Marcello Maranesi , Raffaele Scarano , Joao Vitorino , Gunnar Brandt , Tejas Morbagal Harish\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The integration of Earth Observation (EO) into human health research has expanded significantly, particularly since 2009, highlighting its potential for disease modelling, environmental exposure assessment, and public health decision-making. This review explores the evolving role of EO in health applications through a bibliometric analysis of 1751 research documents retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. These documents were selected using targeted keywords and after excluding non-primary literature such as reviews, editorials, and meeting abstracts. Findings revealed a substantial increase in EO-health research outputs, growing from 2 publications in 1991 to 266 in 2024, with a notable surge beginning in 2009. More than 65 % of the selected studies contributed to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on Climate Action, followed by SDG 3 on Good Health and Wellbeing (<em>n</em> = 994) and SDG 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities (<em>n</em> = 980), illustrating EO's cross-cutting relevance. Despite this growth, the field remains fragmented due to inconsistent data formats, limited accessibility, and weak interdisciplinary collaboration. A key challenge is the persistent divide between EO data producers and health practitioners, which hampers the effective translation of EO insights into practice. This review highlights the importance of co-production approaches that bring together researchers, policymakers, and communities to address these barriers. By promoting standardisation, enhancing data interoperability, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, EO can be more effectively leveraged to support disease surveillance, environmental health monitoring, and evidence-based policy interventions aligned with global health and sustainability goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235293852500254X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235293852500254X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensing human health from Space: An assessment of applications and big data platforms
The integration of Earth Observation (EO) into human health research has expanded significantly, particularly since 2009, highlighting its potential for disease modelling, environmental exposure assessment, and public health decision-making. This review explores the evolving role of EO in health applications through a bibliometric analysis of 1751 research documents retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. These documents were selected using targeted keywords and after excluding non-primary literature such as reviews, editorials, and meeting abstracts. Findings revealed a substantial increase in EO-health research outputs, growing from 2 publications in 1991 to 266 in 2024, with a notable surge beginning in 2009. More than 65 % of the selected studies contributed to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on Climate Action, followed by SDG 3 on Good Health and Wellbeing (n = 994) and SDG 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities (n = 980), illustrating EO's cross-cutting relevance. Despite this growth, the field remains fragmented due to inconsistent data formats, limited accessibility, and weak interdisciplinary collaboration. A key challenge is the persistent divide between EO data producers and health practitioners, which hampers the effective translation of EO insights into practice. This review highlights the importance of co-production approaches that bring together researchers, policymakers, and communities to address these barriers. By promoting standardisation, enhancing data interoperability, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, EO can be more effectively leveraged to support disease surveillance, environmental health monitoring, and evidence-based policy interventions aligned with global health and sustainability goals.
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems