加拿大爱德华王子岛国家公园后多利安森林破坏评估,采用多传感器卫星数据

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Khan Rubayet Rahaman , Md Moniruzzaman , G.M.Towhidul Islam , Md Mehedi Hasan , Akshar Tripathi
{"title":"加拿大爱德华王子岛国家公园后多利安森林破坏评估,采用多传感器卫星数据","authors":"Khan Rubayet Rahaman ,&nbsp;Md Moniruzzaman ,&nbsp;G.M.Towhidul Islam ,&nbsp;Md Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Akshar Tripathi","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyclones have been considered one of the major natural disasters for decades. Particularly, tropical cyclones are more devastating in terms of damage (e.g., physical, environmental, economic). In the present study, we have investigated the forest damage that occurred due to the intense category 5 catastrophic hurricane Dorian that struck one of the Atlantic Provinces, Prince Edward Island (PEI), from August 24 to September 10, 2019. We have employed multi-sensor satellite remote sensing datasets, including Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI), as well as very high-resolution commercial satellite imagery, ground reference points, secondary references, and local knowledge. We have utilized four widely used spectral indices (SIs), including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), normalized difference infrared index (NDII), red-edge spectral indices (RESI), and RADAR Vegetation Index (RVI). First, we assessed the forest damage using a conventional simple method, where the damage area was estimated by subtracting the post-Dorian and pre-Dorian imagery. Second, we have developed an algorithm based on the statistical analysis of the ground reference points and associated vegetation indices and RVI values, as named author derived decision tree (ADDT) method. Finally, random points were generated in the ArcGIS platform, and an accuracy assessment was performed. The height accuracy has been found for the RVI (94.74 %) using the ADDT method, which is comparatively promising. The proposed algorithm will help researchers/scientists to estimate forest damage in varied geographical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-DORIAN forest damage assessment in the Prince Edward Island National Park, Canada employing multi-sensor satellite data\",\"authors\":\"Khan Rubayet Rahaman ,&nbsp;Md Moniruzzaman ,&nbsp;G.M.Towhidul Islam ,&nbsp;Md Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Akshar Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cyclones have been considered one of the major natural disasters for decades. Particularly, tropical cyclones are more devastating in terms of damage (e.g., physical, environmental, economic). In the present study, we have investigated the forest damage that occurred due to the intense category 5 catastrophic hurricane Dorian that struck one of the Atlantic Provinces, Prince Edward Island (PEI), from August 24 to September 10, 2019. We have employed multi-sensor satellite remote sensing datasets, including Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI), as well as very high-resolution commercial satellite imagery, ground reference points, secondary references, and local knowledge. We have utilized four widely used spectral indices (SIs), including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), normalized difference infrared index (NDII), red-edge spectral indices (RESI), and RADAR Vegetation Index (RVI). First, we assessed the forest damage using a conventional simple method, where the damage area was estimated by subtracting the post-Dorian and pre-Dorian imagery. Second, we have developed an algorithm based on the statistical analysis of the ground reference points and associated vegetation indices and RVI values, as named author derived decision tree (ADDT) method. Finally, random points were generated in the ArcGIS platform, and an accuracy assessment was performed. The height accuracy has been found for the RVI (94.74 %) using the ADDT method, which is comparatively promising. The proposed algorithm will help researchers/scientists to estimate forest damage in varied geographical settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,飓风一直被认为是主要的自然灾害之一。特别是,热带气旋在破坏方面更具破坏性(例如,物理、环境、经济)。在本研究中,我们调查了2019年8月24日至9月10日袭击大西洋省份之一爱德华王子岛(PEI)的强烈5级灾难性飓风多里安(Dorian)造成的森林破坏。我们使用了多传感器卫星遥感数据集,包括Sentinel-1合成孔径雷达(SAR)和Sentinel-2多光谱仪器(MSI),以及非常高分辨率的商业卫星图像,地面参考点,次要参考和本地知识。本文采用了归一化植被指数(NDVI)、增强型植被指数(EVI)、归一化红外指数(NDII)、红边光谱指数(RESI)和RADAR植被指数(RVI)四种常用的光谱指数(si)。首先,我们使用传统的简单方法评估森林损害,即通过减去后多利安和前多利安图像来估计损害面积。其次,基于对地面参考点及其相关植被指数和RVI值的统计分析,提出了作者衍生决策树(ADDT)方法。最后在ArcGIS平台上生成随机点,并进行精度评估。采用ADDT法对RVI进行高度精度分析,精度为94.74%,具有较好的应用前景。提出的算法将帮助研究人员/科学家估计不同地理环境下的森林破坏情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-DORIAN forest damage assessment in the Prince Edward Island National Park, Canada employing multi-sensor satellite data
Cyclones have been considered one of the major natural disasters for decades. Particularly, tropical cyclones are more devastating in terms of damage (e.g., physical, environmental, economic). In the present study, we have investigated the forest damage that occurred due to the intense category 5 catastrophic hurricane Dorian that struck one of the Atlantic Provinces, Prince Edward Island (PEI), from August 24 to September 10, 2019. We have employed multi-sensor satellite remote sensing datasets, including Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI), as well as very high-resolution commercial satellite imagery, ground reference points, secondary references, and local knowledge. We have utilized four widely used spectral indices (SIs), including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), normalized difference infrared index (NDII), red-edge spectral indices (RESI), and RADAR Vegetation Index (RVI). First, we assessed the forest damage using a conventional simple method, where the damage area was estimated by subtracting the post-Dorian and pre-Dorian imagery. Second, we have developed an algorithm based on the statistical analysis of the ground reference points and associated vegetation indices and RVI values, as named author derived decision tree (ADDT) method. Finally, random points were generated in the ArcGIS platform, and an accuracy assessment was performed. The height accuracy has been found for the RVI (94.74 %) using the ADDT method, which is comparatively promising. The proposed algorithm will help researchers/scientists to estimate forest damage in varied geographical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信