来自多学科罕见病就诊的见解:一项国家诊断研究中总结文件和参与者调查的结果

Rare Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rare.2025.100105
Lindsay E. Rosenfeld , Kimberly LeBlanc , Anna Nagy , Jorick Bater , Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Alexa T. McCray
{"title":"来自多学科罕见病就诊的见解:一项国家诊断研究中总结文件和参与者调查的结果","authors":"Lindsay E. Rosenfeld ,&nbsp;Kimberly LeBlanc ,&nbsp;Anna Nagy ,&nbsp;Jorick Bater ,&nbsp;Undiagnosed Diseases Network,&nbsp;Alexa T. McCray","doi":"10.1016/j.rare.2025.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study is part of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN). The UDN is designed to improve diagnostic evaluation for patients who have defied diagnosis as well as to identify the underlying mechanism of disease. We explored recommendations made as part of the UDN evaluation, the number and type of specialists involved in that evaluation, and factors related to changes in care following the UDN visit. We used two datasets: visit wrap-up documents and post-evaluation surveys. We created distinct statistical models for each dataset to further understand the patient experience after a multidisciplinary rare disease visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across datasets, the most common primary symptom category was neurology. The mean number of evaluations per participant was 3.8 with the most common being Genetics. The mean number of recommendations per participant was 4.9; 81.5 % had ≥ 1 recommendation. The most common recommendation was referral to a medical provider. Having a diagnosis within 3 months of the UDN visit was associated with more evaluations, but fewer recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UDN visits typically involve evaluations by multiple specialists, potentially resulting in recommendations for downstream care. In the survey sample, over half the participants cited their intention to follow the recommendations made. Maximizing communication about ongoing care management following the UDN visit may also optimize care. Future research can explore how and why such characteristics matter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101058,"journal":{"name":"Rare","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from multidisciplinary rare disease visits: Findings from wrap-up documents and participant surveys in a national diagnostic study\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay E. Rosenfeld ,&nbsp;Kimberly LeBlanc ,&nbsp;Anna Nagy ,&nbsp;Jorick Bater ,&nbsp;Undiagnosed Diseases Network,&nbsp;Alexa T. McCray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rare.2025.100105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study is part of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN). The UDN is designed to improve diagnostic evaluation for patients who have defied diagnosis as well as to identify the underlying mechanism of disease. We explored recommendations made as part of the UDN evaluation, the number and type of specialists involved in that evaluation, and factors related to changes in care following the UDN visit. We used two datasets: visit wrap-up documents and post-evaluation surveys. We created distinct statistical models for each dataset to further understand the patient experience after a multidisciplinary rare disease visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across datasets, the most common primary symptom category was neurology. The mean number of evaluations per participant was 3.8 with the most common being Genetics. The mean number of recommendations per participant was 4.9; 81.5 % had ≥ 1 recommendation. The most common recommendation was referral to a medical provider. Having a diagnosis within 3 months of the UDN visit was associated with more evaluations, but fewer recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UDN visits typically involve evaluations by multiple specialists, potentially resulting in recommendations for downstream care. In the survey sample, over half the participants cited their intention to follow the recommendations made. Maximizing communication about ongoing care management following the UDN visit may also optimize care. Future research can explore how and why such characteristics matter.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rare\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950008725000493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950008725000493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是未诊断疾病网络(UDN)的一部分。UDN的目的是提高对诊断无效的患者的诊断评估,并确定疾病的潜在机制。我们探讨了作为UDN评估的一部分提出的建议,参与该评估的专家的数量和类型,以及UDN访问后护理变化的相关因素。我们使用了两个数据集:访问总结文件和评估后调查。我们为每个数据集创建了不同的统计模型,以进一步了解多学科罕见病就诊后的患者体验。结果在所有数据集中,最常见的主要症状类别是神经病学。每位参与者的平均评估次数为3.8次,其中最常见的是遗传学。每位参与者的平均推荐数为4.9;81.5 %建议≥ 1。最常见的建议是转诊到医疗机构。在UDN就诊后3个月内确诊与更多的评估相关,但建议较少。udn就诊通常包括多名专家的评估,可能导致对下游护理的建议。在调查样本中,超过一半的参与者表示他们打算遵循所提出的建议。在UDN访问后最大限度地沟通正在进行的护理管理也可以优化护理。未来的研究可以探索这些特征是如何以及为什么重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from multidisciplinary rare disease visits: Findings from wrap-up documents and participant surveys in a national diagnostic study

Background

This study is part of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN). The UDN is designed to improve diagnostic evaluation for patients who have defied diagnosis as well as to identify the underlying mechanism of disease. We explored recommendations made as part of the UDN evaluation, the number and type of specialists involved in that evaluation, and factors related to changes in care following the UDN visit. We used two datasets: visit wrap-up documents and post-evaluation surveys. We created distinct statistical models for each dataset to further understand the patient experience after a multidisciplinary rare disease visit.

Results

Across datasets, the most common primary symptom category was neurology. The mean number of evaluations per participant was 3.8 with the most common being Genetics. The mean number of recommendations per participant was 4.9; 81.5 % had ≥ 1 recommendation. The most common recommendation was referral to a medical provider. Having a diagnosis within 3 months of the UDN visit was associated with more evaluations, but fewer recommendations.

Conclusion

UDN visits typically involve evaluations by multiple specialists, potentially resulting in recommendations for downstream care. In the survey sample, over half the participants cited their intention to follow the recommendations made. Maximizing communication about ongoing care management following the UDN visit may also optimize care. Future research can explore how and why such characteristics matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信