Aleksandr Marfin , Matthew Jacek Brzozowski , Peter Lightfoot , Xin Ding , Michael Bizimis , Shelby True Rader , Molly Karnes , Valeriya Brovchenko , Tatyana Radomskaya , Alexei Ivanov , Olga Belozerova
{"title":"交代岩石圈地幔在诺里尔斯克1号镍铜铂族元素硫化物矿床形成中的作用:Cu同位素证据","authors":"Aleksandr Marfin , Matthew Jacek Brzozowski , Peter Lightfoot , Xin Ding , Michael Bizimis , Shelby True Rader , Molly Karnes , Valeriya Brovchenko , Tatyana Radomskaya , Alexei Ivanov , Olga Belozerova","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mechanisms of formation of magmatic Ni–Cu–platinum-group element (PGE) sulfide ore deposits, such as those of the world-class Norilsk–Talnakh mineral system, have been extensively studied, but the source of metals in these systems remains unclear. Potential metal sources are a mantle plume (derived from the lower mantle), subcontinental lithospheric mantle, and crustal materials. To provide insights into the source of metals for the Norilsk–Talnakh system, we integrate new Cu isotope data of chalcopyrite with bulk-rock major-element, trace-element, and PGE–Au contents from the Norilsk 1 deposit in Polar Siberia.</div><div>The <sup>65</sup>Cu/<sup>63</sup>Cu ratios (reported as δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ratio relative to SRM NIST 976) of disseminated sulfides and massive sulfide samples vary from −0.3 to 0.42 ‰ and − 0.33 to 0.35 ‰, respectively. These values extend to both lower and higher values compared to unmodified upper mantle-derived rocks (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu<sub>mantle</sub> from −0.14 to 0.26 ‰). These isotopic signatures cannot be explained by post-magmatic alteration, metamorphic processes, or contamination by upper crustal rocks because they do not correlate with the abundance of secondary minerals, S/Se and Th/Nb ratios, or MgO contents. The variation of δ<sup>65</sup>Cu in disseminated sulfides is consistent with progressive interaction of isotopically light sulfide liquid (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ≈ −0.5 ‰) with isotopically heavy silicate melt (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ≈ 0.63 ‰). This isotopic range reflects heterogeneity in the mantle source to the Norilsk 1 deposit. The heavy-δ<sup>65</sup>Cu component may have been inherited from a pyroxenite source in the metasomatized lithospheric mantle beneath the Siberian Craton. After exhaustion of the pyroxenitic component in the source during melting, δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values returned to mantle values, where subsequent magma pulses produced disseminated sulfides with δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values less than 0, the variability of which can be explained by Rayleigh fractionation of the sulfide liquid. The δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values of chalcopyrite in MS are positively correlated with bulk-rock Cu/(Cu + Ni) ratios, consistent with the fractionation of ∼40–60 % monosulfide solid solution from the original sulfide liquid. Our study demonstrates a potential contribution from metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle and a pyroxenitic component to the formation of the Norilsk 1 Ni–Cu–PGE deposit, and highlights the important influence of previous subduction events in modifying and re-enriching the subcontinental lithospheric mantle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"695 ","pages":"Article 123034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of metasomatized lithospheric mantle in generating the Norilsk 1 Ni–Cu–platinum-group element sulfide deposit: Cu isotope evidence\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandr Marfin , Matthew Jacek Brzozowski , Peter Lightfoot , Xin Ding , Michael Bizimis , Shelby True Rader , Molly Karnes , Valeriya Brovchenko , Tatyana Radomskaya , Alexei Ivanov , Olga Belozerova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The mechanisms of formation of magmatic Ni–Cu–platinum-group element (PGE) sulfide ore deposits, such as those of the world-class Norilsk–Talnakh mineral system, have been extensively studied, but the source of metals in these systems remains unclear. Potential metal sources are a mantle plume (derived from the lower mantle), subcontinental lithospheric mantle, and crustal materials. To provide insights into the source of metals for the Norilsk–Talnakh system, we integrate new Cu isotope data of chalcopyrite with bulk-rock major-element, trace-element, and PGE–Au contents from the Norilsk 1 deposit in Polar Siberia.</div><div>The <sup>65</sup>Cu/<sup>63</sup>Cu ratios (reported as δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ratio relative to SRM NIST 976) of disseminated sulfides and massive sulfide samples vary from −0.3 to 0.42 ‰ and − 0.33 to 0.35 ‰, respectively. These values extend to both lower and higher values compared to unmodified upper mantle-derived rocks (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu<sub>mantle</sub> from −0.14 to 0.26 ‰). These isotopic signatures cannot be explained by post-magmatic alteration, metamorphic processes, or contamination by upper crustal rocks because they do not correlate with the abundance of secondary minerals, S/Se and Th/Nb ratios, or MgO contents. The variation of δ<sup>65</sup>Cu in disseminated sulfides is consistent with progressive interaction of isotopically light sulfide liquid (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ≈ −0.5 ‰) with isotopically heavy silicate melt (δ<sup>65</sup>Cu ≈ 0.63 ‰). This isotopic range reflects heterogeneity in the mantle source to the Norilsk 1 deposit. The heavy-δ<sup>65</sup>Cu component may have been inherited from a pyroxenite source in the metasomatized lithospheric mantle beneath the Siberian Craton. After exhaustion of the pyroxenitic component in the source during melting, δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values returned to mantle values, where subsequent magma pulses produced disseminated sulfides with δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values less than 0, the variability of which can be explained by Rayleigh fractionation of the sulfide liquid. The δ<sup>65</sup>Cu values of chalcopyrite in MS are positively correlated with bulk-rock Cu/(Cu + Ni) ratios, consistent with the fractionation of ∼40–60 % monosulfide solid solution from the original sulfide liquid. Our study demonstrates a potential contribution from metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle and a pyroxenitic component to the formation of the Norilsk 1 Ni–Cu–PGE deposit, and highlights the important influence of previous subduction events in modifying and re-enriching the subcontinental lithospheric mantle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"volume\":\"695 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125004243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125004243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of metasomatized lithospheric mantle in generating the Norilsk 1 Ni–Cu–platinum-group element sulfide deposit: Cu isotope evidence
The mechanisms of formation of magmatic Ni–Cu–platinum-group element (PGE) sulfide ore deposits, such as those of the world-class Norilsk–Talnakh mineral system, have been extensively studied, but the source of metals in these systems remains unclear. Potential metal sources are a mantle plume (derived from the lower mantle), subcontinental lithospheric mantle, and crustal materials. To provide insights into the source of metals for the Norilsk–Talnakh system, we integrate new Cu isotope data of chalcopyrite with bulk-rock major-element, trace-element, and PGE–Au contents from the Norilsk 1 deposit in Polar Siberia.
The 65Cu/63Cu ratios (reported as δ65Cu ratio relative to SRM NIST 976) of disseminated sulfides and massive sulfide samples vary from −0.3 to 0.42 ‰ and − 0.33 to 0.35 ‰, respectively. These values extend to both lower and higher values compared to unmodified upper mantle-derived rocks (δ65Cumantle from −0.14 to 0.26 ‰). These isotopic signatures cannot be explained by post-magmatic alteration, metamorphic processes, or contamination by upper crustal rocks because they do not correlate with the abundance of secondary minerals, S/Se and Th/Nb ratios, or MgO contents. The variation of δ65Cu in disseminated sulfides is consistent with progressive interaction of isotopically light sulfide liquid (δ65Cu ≈ −0.5 ‰) with isotopically heavy silicate melt (δ65Cu ≈ 0.63 ‰). This isotopic range reflects heterogeneity in the mantle source to the Norilsk 1 deposit. The heavy-δ65Cu component may have been inherited from a pyroxenite source in the metasomatized lithospheric mantle beneath the Siberian Craton. After exhaustion of the pyroxenitic component in the source during melting, δ65Cu values returned to mantle values, where subsequent magma pulses produced disseminated sulfides with δ65Cu values less than 0, the variability of which can be explained by Rayleigh fractionation of the sulfide liquid. The δ65Cu values of chalcopyrite in MS are positively correlated with bulk-rock Cu/(Cu + Ni) ratios, consistent with the fractionation of ∼40–60 % monosulfide solid solution from the original sulfide liquid. Our study demonstrates a potential contribution from metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle and a pyroxenitic component to the formation of the Norilsk 1 Ni–Cu–PGE deposit, and highlights the important influence of previous subduction events in modifying and re-enriching the subcontinental lithospheric mantle.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry.
The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry.
Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry.
The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.