L. Serra , A. Domínguez-Bugarín , G. Jiménez , C. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M. Braun , S. Kelm , L.E. Herranz
{"title":"从工厂布局到优化的LP和3D PWR-KWU密封模型,用于使用GOTHIC 8.3(QA)进行燃烧风险评估","authors":"L. Serra , A. Domínguez-Bugarín , G. Jiménez , C. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M. Braun , S. Kelm , L.E. Herranz","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the key objectives of the severe accident management strategies is to preserve containment integrity and to prevent a large release of radioactive products into the environment. To evaluate containment response during a severe accident (SA), two GOTHIC 8.3(QA) models (LP and 3D) of a PWR-KWU containment have been developed in the framework of AMHYCO (EU-funded Horizon 2020 project). The LP and 3D models were compared for the in-vessel phase of a total loss of AC power scenario (SBO), with and without considering Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners (PARs). The two models showed consistent global trends, but the 3D model revealed local variations in hydrogen stratification, condensation, and temperature gradients that were not captured by the LP model. 3D results also highlighted the influence of 3D mesh resolution on stratification and flammability conditions, with finer meshes predicting different hydrogen accumulation flow patterns. As expected, PARs effectively reduced flammable volumes in both models, although 3D models yielded lower recombination rates due to local heterogeneities. Last, this study emphasizes the importance of the post-processing choices made by the user to identify safety relevant conditions with the potential to enhance accident management measures and the positioning of safety systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"445 ","pages":"Article 114459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the plant layouts to optimized LP and 3D PWR-KWU containment models for combustion risk assessment with GOTHIC 8.3(QA)\",\"authors\":\"L. Serra , A. Domínguez-Bugarín , G. Jiménez , C. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M. Braun , S. Kelm , L.E. Herranz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>One of the key objectives of the severe accident management strategies is to preserve containment integrity and to prevent a large release of radioactive products into the environment. To evaluate containment response during a severe accident (SA), two GOTHIC 8.3(QA) models (LP and 3D) of a PWR-KWU containment have been developed in the framework of AMHYCO (EU-funded Horizon 2020 project). The LP and 3D models were compared for the in-vessel phase of a total loss of AC power scenario (SBO), with and without considering Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners (PARs). The two models showed consistent global trends, but the 3D model revealed local variations in hydrogen stratification, condensation, and temperature gradients that were not captured by the LP model. 3D results also highlighted the influence of 3D mesh resolution on stratification and flammability conditions, with finer meshes predicting different hydrogen accumulation flow patterns. As expected, PARs effectively reduced flammable volumes in both models, although 3D models yielded lower recombination rates due to local heterogeneities. Last, this study emphasizes the importance of the post-processing choices made by the user to identify safety relevant conditions with the potential to enhance accident management measures and the positioning of safety systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"445 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325006363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325006363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
From the plant layouts to optimized LP and 3D PWR-KWU containment models for combustion risk assessment with GOTHIC 8.3(QA)
One of the key objectives of the severe accident management strategies is to preserve containment integrity and to prevent a large release of radioactive products into the environment. To evaluate containment response during a severe accident (SA), two GOTHIC 8.3(QA) models (LP and 3D) of a PWR-KWU containment have been developed in the framework of AMHYCO (EU-funded Horizon 2020 project). The LP and 3D models were compared for the in-vessel phase of a total loss of AC power scenario (SBO), with and without considering Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners (PARs). The two models showed consistent global trends, but the 3D model revealed local variations in hydrogen stratification, condensation, and temperature gradients that were not captured by the LP model. 3D results also highlighted the influence of 3D mesh resolution on stratification and flammability conditions, with finer meshes predicting different hydrogen accumulation flow patterns. As expected, PARs effectively reduced flammable volumes in both models, although 3D models yielded lower recombination rates due to local heterogeneities. Last, this study emphasizes the importance of the post-processing choices made by the user to identify safety relevant conditions with the potential to enhance accident management measures and the positioning of safety systems.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.