{"title":"复仇主义、误认和空间配置:罗马尼亚取消2024年选举的资本整合和选举地理","authors":"Norbert Petrovici , Florin Poenaru","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines how territorial inequalities shaped electoral options in Romania in the annulled 2024 presidential elections. Anti-systemic mobilisation did not emerge from deindustrialised or economically ‘left-behind’ zones, but, we argue, from regions of domestic-led industrial growth embedded in broader territories dominated by foreign capital. These localities, central to production yet marginal in national imaginaries and policy voice, illustrate a condition we define as <em>blocked centrality</em>, the disjunction between economic contribution and political incorporation within advanced peripheral economies. Here, foreign direct investment structures accumulation and governance, while domestic production enclaves remain symbolically excluded. Methodologically, the study proposes a multi-stage spatial modelling strategy combining spatial error models, seemingly unrelated regressions, and principal component analysis. This approach operationalises <em>symbolic misrecognition</em> as a spatial mismatch between structural participation and representational visibility. The results challenge binary framings of growth vs. decline and urban vs. rural. Revanchist mobilisation is shown to stem not from economic abandonment, contributing to debates on peripheral capitalism, political blocs, and the spatial politics of recognition in Europe’s advanced peripheries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revanchism, misrecognition, and spatial configurations: capital integration and the electoral geography of Romania’s cancelled 2024 elections\",\"authors\":\"Norbert Petrovici , Florin Poenaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article examines how territorial inequalities shaped electoral options in Romania in the annulled 2024 presidential elections. Anti-systemic mobilisation did not emerge from deindustrialised or economically ‘left-behind’ zones, but, we argue, from regions of domestic-led industrial growth embedded in broader territories dominated by foreign capital. These localities, central to production yet marginal in national imaginaries and policy voice, illustrate a condition we define as <em>blocked centrality</em>, the disjunction between economic contribution and political incorporation within advanced peripheral economies. Here, foreign direct investment structures accumulation and governance, while domestic production enclaves remain symbolically excluded. Methodologically, the study proposes a multi-stage spatial modelling strategy combining spatial error models, seemingly unrelated regressions, and principal component analysis. This approach operationalises <em>symbolic misrecognition</em> as a spatial mismatch between structural participation and representational visibility. The results challenge binary framings of growth vs. decline and urban vs. rural. Revanchist mobilisation is shown to stem not from economic abandonment, contributing to debates on peripheral capitalism, political blocs, and the spatial politics of recognition in Europe’s advanced peripheries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525002088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525002088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revanchism, misrecognition, and spatial configurations: capital integration and the electoral geography of Romania’s cancelled 2024 elections
This article examines how territorial inequalities shaped electoral options in Romania in the annulled 2024 presidential elections. Anti-systemic mobilisation did not emerge from deindustrialised or economically ‘left-behind’ zones, but, we argue, from regions of domestic-led industrial growth embedded in broader territories dominated by foreign capital. These localities, central to production yet marginal in national imaginaries and policy voice, illustrate a condition we define as blocked centrality, the disjunction between economic contribution and political incorporation within advanced peripheral economies. Here, foreign direct investment structures accumulation and governance, while domestic production enclaves remain symbolically excluded. Methodologically, the study proposes a multi-stage spatial modelling strategy combining spatial error models, seemingly unrelated regressions, and principal component analysis. This approach operationalises symbolic misrecognition as a spatial mismatch between structural participation and representational visibility. The results challenge binary framings of growth vs. decline and urban vs. rural. Revanchist mobilisation is shown to stem not from economic abandonment, contributing to debates on peripheral capitalism, political blocs, and the spatial politics of recognition in Europe’s advanced peripheries.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.