David-Dan Nguyen , Aisha Lofters , Christopher J.D. Wallis , Alexandre R. Zlotta , Neil E. Fleshner , Quoc-Dien Trinh , Antonio Finelli , Laura C. Rosella , Allan S. Detsky , Monique J. Roobol , Girish S. Kulkarni
{"title":"现在是加拿大重新审视前列腺癌筛查方法的时候了吗?","authors":"David-Dan Nguyen , Aisha Lofters , Christopher J.D. Wallis , Alexandre R. Zlotta , Neil E. Fleshner , Quoc-Dien Trinh , Antonio Finelli , Laura C. Rosella , Allan S. Detsky , Monique J. Roobol , Girish S. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death among Canadian men. Despite advances in the last decade mitigating overdiagnosis and overtreatment, Canadian guidelines have recommended against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening since 2014. This has resulted in opportunistic screening, marked by inequitable access, low-value testing, and missed opportunities for early detection. We review global policy developments, emerging trial data, and implementation strategies, which suggest that organised, risk-stratified screening may improve outcomes and equity. However, overdiagnosis and associated harms remain a concern within organised programs. To address this uncertainty and generate timely, policy-relevant evidence, we propose implementing population-wide, adaptive platform trials embedded in the healthcare system. This design would enable real-time integration of new technologies, standardised protocols, and equitable access—hallmarks of a learning healthcare system. Such a model could help Canada modernise prostate cancer screening while carefully weighing benefits, harms, and equity in a rapidly evolving landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101180"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it time for Canada to revisit its approach to prostate cancer screening?\",\"authors\":\"David-Dan Nguyen , Aisha Lofters , Christopher J.D. Wallis , Alexandre R. Zlotta , Neil E. Fleshner , Quoc-Dien Trinh , Antonio Finelli , Laura C. Rosella , Allan S. Detsky , Monique J. Roobol , Girish S. Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death among Canadian men. Despite advances in the last decade mitigating overdiagnosis and overtreatment, Canadian guidelines have recommended against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening since 2014. This has resulted in opportunistic screening, marked by inequitable access, low-value testing, and missed opportunities for early detection. We review global policy developments, emerging trial data, and implementation strategies, which suggest that organised, risk-stratified screening may improve outcomes and equity. However, overdiagnosis and associated harms remain a concern within organised programs. To address this uncertainty and generate timely, policy-relevant evidence, we propose implementing population-wide, adaptive platform trials embedded in the healthcare system. This design would enable real-time integration of new technologies, standardised protocols, and equitable access—hallmarks of a learning healthcare system. Such a model could help Canada modernise prostate cancer screening while carefully weighing benefits, harms, and equity in a rapidly evolving landscape.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25001905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25001905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is it time for Canada to revisit its approach to prostate cancer screening?
Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death among Canadian men. Despite advances in the last decade mitigating overdiagnosis and overtreatment, Canadian guidelines have recommended against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening since 2014. This has resulted in opportunistic screening, marked by inequitable access, low-value testing, and missed opportunities for early detection. We review global policy developments, emerging trial data, and implementation strategies, which suggest that organised, risk-stratified screening may improve outcomes and equity. However, overdiagnosis and associated harms remain a concern within organised programs. To address this uncertainty and generate timely, policy-relevant evidence, we propose implementing population-wide, adaptive platform trials embedded in the healthcare system. This design would enable real-time integration of new technologies, standardised protocols, and equitable access—hallmarks of a learning healthcare system. Such a model could help Canada modernise prostate cancer screening while carefully weighing benefits, harms, and equity in a rapidly evolving landscape.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.