Rachel R Adler,Richard E Chunga,Joely A Centracchio,Zeba N Ahmad,Karen R Sepucha,Christina Sheu,Sasha Boyers,Samir K Shah,Clancy Clark,Dae Kim,Susan L Mitchell,Emily Finlayson,Zara Cooper,John Hsu,Joel S Weissman,Lara Traeger
{"title":"痴呆症患者和护理人员在手术决策方面的经验。","authors":"Rachel R Adler,Richard E Chunga,Joely A Centracchio,Zeba N Ahmad,Karen R Sepucha,Christina Sheu,Sasha Boyers,Samir K Shah,Clancy Clark,Dae Kim,Susan L Mitchell,Emily Finlayson,Zara Cooper,John Hsu,Joel S Weissman,Lara Traeger","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo explore patient and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making for patients living with dementia (PLWD).\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nPLWD face heightened risks of poor surgical outcomes. For PLWD, surgical decisions are often made in collaboration with caregivers (family or close others who support the PLWD), yet there is limited research examining PLWD and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted in-depth interviews with nationally recruited PLWD (n=11) and caregivers (n=36) facing a surgical decision within the past two years. Interviews explored surgical decision-making experiences. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we coded the transcribed interview data and developed themes related to decision-making priorities, strategies, experiences, and satisfaction.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe following themes were identified: (1) PLWD and caregivers prioritized quality-of-life outcomes, (2) They struggled to anticipate benefits and risks of treatment options for the PLWD, (3) Caregivers felt a heavy burden to make the \"right\" decision when PLWD were unable to participate in decision-making, and (4) Decisional regret stemmed from a lack of alignment between the decision and what the caregiver felt the PLWD would have wanted.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPLWD and caregivers navigated fraught surgical decisions and sought the 'right' balance between potential cognitive and functional tradeoffs of surgical and non-surgical options. Findings highlight the need for targeted decisional support for PLWD as well as caregivers who face decision-making on behalf of PLWD. Results inform potential mechanisms for improving surgical decision-making quality and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Caregiver Experiences with Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel R Adler,Richard E Chunga,Joely A Centracchio,Zeba N Ahmad,Karen R Sepucha,Christina Sheu,Sasha Boyers,Samir K Shah,Clancy Clark,Dae Kim,Susan L Mitchell,Emily Finlayson,Zara Cooper,John Hsu,Joel S Weissman,Lara Traeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sla.0000000000006936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo explore patient and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making for patients living with dementia (PLWD).\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\\r\\nPLWD face heightened risks of poor surgical outcomes. For PLWD, surgical decisions are often made in collaboration with caregivers (family or close others who support the PLWD), yet there is limited research examining PLWD and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted in-depth interviews with nationally recruited PLWD (n=11) and caregivers (n=36) facing a surgical decision within the past two years. Interviews explored surgical decision-making experiences. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we coded the transcribed interview data and developed themes related to decision-making priorities, strategies, experiences, and satisfaction.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe following themes were identified: (1) PLWD and caregivers prioritized quality-of-life outcomes, (2) They struggled to anticipate benefits and risks of treatment options for the PLWD, (3) Caregivers felt a heavy burden to make the \\\"right\\\" decision when PLWD were unable to participate in decision-making, and (4) Decisional regret stemmed from a lack of alignment between the decision and what the caregiver felt the PLWD would have wanted.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nPLWD and caregivers navigated fraught surgical decisions and sought the 'right' balance between potential cognitive and functional tradeoffs of surgical and non-surgical options. Findings highlight the need for targeted decisional support for PLWD as well as caregivers who face decision-making on behalf of PLWD. Results inform potential mechanisms for improving surgical decision-making quality and outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006936\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006936","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient and Caregiver Experiences with Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.
OBJECTIVE
To explore patient and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making for patients living with dementia (PLWD).
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
PLWD face heightened risks of poor surgical outcomes. For PLWD, surgical decisions are often made in collaboration with caregivers (family or close others who support the PLWD), yet there is limited research examining PLWD and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making.
METHODS
We conducted in-depth interviews with nationally recruited PLWD (n=11) and caregivers (n=36) facing a surgical decision within the past two years. Interviews explored surgical decision-making experiences. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we coded the transcribed interview data and developed themes related to decision-making priorities, strategies, experiences, and satisfaction.
RESULTS
The following themes were identified: (1) PLWD and caregivers prioritized quality-of-life outcomes, (2) They struggled to anticipate benefits and risks of treatment options for the PLWD, (3) Caregivers felt a heavy burden to make the "right" decision when PLWD were unable to participate in decision-making, and (4) Decisional regret stemmed from a lack of alignment between the decision and what the caregiver felt the PLWD would have wanted.
CONCLUSIONS
PLWD and caregivers navigated fraught surgical decisions and sought the 'right' balance between potential cognitive and functional tradeoffs of surgical and non-surgical options. Findings highlight the need for targeted decisional support for PLWD as well as caregivers who face decision-making on behalf of PLWD. Results inform potential mechanisms for improving surgical decision-making quality and outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.