Nitsan Miron, Nir Shpack, Michael V Joachim, Amir Laviv
{"title":"青少年正畸治疗合作的差异:Z世代与Y世代。","authors":"Nitsan Miron, Nir Shpack, Michael V Joachim, Amir Laviv","doi":"10.2319/112324-960.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare orthodontic treatment cooperation between Generation Y and Generation Z teenagers and evaluate influence of age on compliance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing records of 124 patients (62 from each generation) treated at Tel Aviv University Dental School between 2007 and 2021. Patient cooperation was assessed through weighted noncompliance scores incorporating elastic or headgear wear, oral hygiene, appointment attendance, appliance breakage, and new caries development. Each noncompliance incident was weighted (1.0 point for major incidents, 0.5 for minor) and standardized by treatment duration. Multiple regression analysis accounted for age differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age differed significantly between Generation Y (15.5 ± 1.7 years) and Generation Z (13.1 ± 1.6 years; <i>P</i> < .001). Initial noncooperation scores were similar (Generation Y: 36.8% ± 16.4%; Generation Z: 35.8% ± 15.8%; <i>P</i> = .732). After age adjustment, regression analysis revealed significantly higher noncooperation in Generation Y (B = 8.29; <i>P</i> = .014). Age independently influenced cooperation, with each year increase associated with a 3% decrease in noncooperation scores (B = -3.04; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generation Z teenagers exhibited better orthodontic treatment cooperation than Generation Y after age adjustment. Age independently predicted cooperation, with older teenagers showing better compliance regardless of generation. Treatment planning should consider both generational differences and individual patient factors when selecting compliance-dependent treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"95 5","pages":"538-543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the cooperation of teenagers for orthodontic treatment: Z Generation versus Y Generation.\",\"authors\":\"Nitsan Miron, Nir Shpack, Michael V Joachim, Amir Laviv\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/112324-960.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare orthodontic treatment cooperation between Generation Y and Generation Z teenagers and evaluate influence of age on compliance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing records of 124 patients (62 from each generation) treated at Tel Aviv University Dental School between 2007 and 2021. Patient cooperation was assessed through weighted noncompliance scores incorporating elastic or headgear wear, oral hygiene, appointment attendance, appliance breakage, and new caries development. Each noncompliance incident was weighted (1.0 point for major incidents, 0.5 for minor) and standardized by treatment duration. Multiple regression analysis accounted for age differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age differed significantly between Generation Y (15.5 ± 1.7 years) and Generation Z (13.1 ± 1.6 years; <i>P</i> < .001). Initial noncooperation scores were similar (Generation Y: 36.8% ± 16.4%; Generation Z: 35.8% ± 15.8%; <i>P</i> = .732). After age adjustment, regression analysis revealed significantly higher noncooperation in Generation Y (B = 8.29; <i>P</i> = .014). Age independently influenced cooperation, with each year increase associated with a 3% decrease in noncooperation scores (B = -3.04; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generation Z teenagers exhibited better orthodontic treatment cooperation than Generation Y after age adjustment. Age independently predicted cooperation, with older teenagers showing better compliance regardless of generation. Treatment planning should consider both generational differences and individual patient factors when selecting compliance-dependent treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\"95 5\",\"pages\":\"538-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/112324-960.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/112324-960.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较Y世代与Z世代青少年正畸治疗配合情况,评价年龄对依从性的影响。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了2007年至2021年间在特拉维夫大学牙科学院接受治疗的124例患者(每代62例)的记录。通过加权不合规评分评估患者的配合情况,包括弹性或头套佩戴、口腔卫生、预约出勤、矫治器破损和新龋的发展。每个不合规事件加权(严重事件1.0分,轻微事件0.5分),并按治疗时间标准化。多元回归分析解释了年龄差异。结果:Y世代平均年龄(15.5±1.7岁)与Z世代平均年龄(13.1±1.6岁)差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。初始不合作得分相似(Y世代:36.8%±16.4%;Z世代:35.8%±15.8%;P = 0.732)。年龄调整后,回归分析显示Y世代的不合作倾向显著增加(B = 8.29; P = 0.014)。年龄独立影响合作,每增加一年与不合作得分下降3%相关(B = -3.04; P < .001)。结论:年龄调整后,Z世代青少年的正畸治疗配合度优于Y世代。年龄独立预测合作,年龄较大的青少年表现出更好的依从性,与年龄无关。在选择依从性依赖治疗方案时,治疗计划应考虑代际差异和个体患者因素。
Differences in the cooperation of teenagers for orthodontic treatment: Z Generation versus Y Generation.
Objectives: To compare orthodontic treatment cooperation between Generation Y and Generation Z teenagers and evaluate influence of age on compliance.
Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing records of 124 patients (62 from each generation) treated at Tel Aviv University Dental School between 2007 and 2021. Patient cooperation was assessed through weighted noncompliance scores incorporating elastic or headgear wear, oral hygiene, appointment attendance, appliance breakage, and new caries development. Each noncompliance incident was weighted (1.0 point for major incidents, 0.5 for minor) and standardized by treatment duration. Multiple regression analysis accounted for age differences.
Results: Mean age differed significantly between Generation Y (15.5 ± 1.7 years) and Generation Z (13.1 ± 1.6 years; P < .001). Initial noncooperation scores were similar (Generation Y: 36.8% ± 16.4%; Generation Z: 35.8% ± 15.8%; P = .732). After age adjustment, regression analysis revealed significantly higher noncooperation in Generation Y (B = 8.29; P = .014). Age independently influenced cooperation, with each year increase associated with a 3% decrease in noncooperation scores (B = -3.04; P < .001).
Conclusions: Generation Z teenagers exhibited better orthodontic treatment cooperation than Generation Y after age adjustment. Age independently predicted cooperation, with older teenagers showing better compliance regardless of generation. Treatment planning should consider both generational differences and individual patient factors when selecting compliance-dependent treatment options.