模糊逻辑护理工具在外科患者早期急性肾损伤检测中的应用。

Frontiers in nephrology Pub Date : 2025-08-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880
Nooreena Yusop, Samsiah Mat, Ruslinda Mustafar, Muhammad Ishamuddin Ismail
{"title":"模糊逻辑护理工具在外科患者早期急性肾损伤检测中的应用。","authors":"Nooreena Yusop, Samsiah Mat, Ruslinda Mustafar, Muhammad Ishamuddin Ismail","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common yet preventable complication among surgical patients, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Early detection is critical; however, the absence of a standardized nursing-led risk assessment tool for AKI limits proactive intervention in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Nursing Risk Assessment for Acute Kidney Injury tool, integrating the Fuzzy Logic Model (FLM) to enhance interpretive accuracy and improve nursing-led AKI risk detection and decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Design and Development Research (DDR) framework was employed in three phases. Phase 1 involved a needs analysis using a focus group discussion to explore the necessity of AKI assessment among surgical nurses. Phase 2 focused on tool development through expert consensus (surgeon, nephrologist, nursing academician, and experienced nurse) and evidence synthesis via a systematic literature review. In Phase 3, the Nursing Risk Assessment-AKI tool was evaluated through a quasi-experimental design at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), Kuala Lumpur, involving 75 surgical nurses assessing 200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention analysis indicated increased nursing confidence, with 95.7% expressing positive perception of tool use. The FLM-supported tool demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 81.3%; however, the potential for false positives or negatives remains, especially given the single-center context. Fuzzy logic stratified patients into risk groups: at risk (33.5%), borderline (20.5%), and no risk (46.0%). ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between AKI risk and factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, clinical/laboratory parameters, surgery types, and nephrotoxic agent usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While initial findings support the usability and clinical feasibility of the NURA-AKI tool, further multicenter validation is needed. The tool is designed to complement nurse judgment, promoting early AKI detection and structured risk communication in surgical care without replacing clinical autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73091,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nephrology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1624880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nooreena Yusop, Samsiah Mat, Ruslinda Mustafar, Muhammad Ishamuddin Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common yet preventable complication among surgical patients, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Early detection is critical; however, the absence of a standardized nursing-led risk assessment tool for AKI limits proactive intervention in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Nursing Risk Assessment for Acute Kidney Injury tool, integrating the Fuzzy Logic Model (FLM) to enhance interpretive accuracy and improve nursing-led AKI risk detection and decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Design and Development Research (DDR) framework was employed in three phases. Phase 1 involved a needs analysis using a focus group discussion to explore the necessity of AKI assessment among surgical nurses. Phase 2 focused on tool development through expert consensus (surgeon, nephrologist, nursing academician, and experienced nurse) and evidence synthesis via a systematic literature review. In Phase 3, the Nursing Risk Assessment-AKI tool was evaluated through a quasi-experimental design at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), Kuala Lumpur, involving 75 surgical nurses assessing 200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention analysis indicated increased nursing confidence, with 95.7% expressing positive perception of tool use. The FLM-supported tool demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 81.3%; however, the potential for false positives or negatives remains, especially given the single-center context. Fuzzy logic stratified patients into risk groups: at risk (33.5%), borderline (20.5%), and no risk (46.0%). ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between AKI risk and factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, clinical/laboratory parameters, surgery types, and nephrotoxic agent usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While initial findings support the usability and clinical feasibility of the NURA-AKI tool, further multicenter validation is needed. The tool is designed to complement nurse judgment, promoting early AKI detection and structured risk communication in surgical care without replacing clinical autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1624880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)是外科患者中一种常见但可预防的并发症,导致发病率增加、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加。早期发现至关重要;然而,缺乏标准化的护理主导的AKI风险评估工具限制了临床实践中的主动干预。目的:本研究旨在开发和评估急性肾损伤护理风险评估工具,整合模糊逻辑模型(FLM),以提高解释准确性,改善护理主导的AKI风险检测和决策。方法:采用设计与开发研究(DDR)框架,分三个阶段进行。第一阶段涉及需求分析,使用焦点小组讨论来探讨外科护士AKI评估的必要性。第二阶段侧重于通过专家共识(外科医生、肾病专家、护理专家和经验丰富的护士)和通过系统文献综述的证据合成来开发工具。在第三阶段,护理风险评估- aki工具在吉隆坡Canselor Tuanku Muhriz医院(HCTM)通过准实验设计进行评估,涉及75名外科护士评估200名患者。结果:干预后分析显示护理信心增强,95.7%的患者对工具使用持积极态度。flm支持的工具预测准确率为81.3%;然而,假阳性或假阴性的可能性仍然存在,特别是在单中心的背景下。模糊逻辑将患者分为危险组:有危险(33.5%)、边缘危险(20.5%)和无危险(46.0%)。方差分析显示,AKI风险与年龄、性别、合并症、临床/实验室参数、手术类型和肾毒性药物使用等因素之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:虽然初步研究结果支持NURA-AKI工具的可用性和临床可行性,但需要进一步的多中心验证。该工具旨在补充护士的判断,促进早期AKI检测和手术护理中的结构化风险沟通,而不取代临床自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.

Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.

Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.

Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common yet preventable complication among surgical patients, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Early detection is critical; however, the absence of a standardized nursing-led risk assessment tool for AKI limits proactive intervention in clinical practice.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Nursing Risk Assessment for Acute Kidney Injury tool, integrating the Fuzzy Logic Model (FLM) to enhance interpretive accuracy and improve nursing-led AKI risk detection and decision-making.

Methods: A Design and Development Research (DDR) framework was employed in three phases. Phase 1 involved a needs analysis using a focus group discussion to explore the necessity of AKI assessment among surgical nurses. Phase 2 focused on tool development through expert consensus (surgeon, nephrologist, nursing academician, and experienced nurse) and evidence synthesis via a systematic literature review. In Phase 3, the Nursing Risk Assessment-AKI tool was evaluated through a quasi-experimental design at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), Kuala Lumpur, involving 75 surgical nurses assessing 200 patients.

Results: Post-intervention analysis indicated increased nursing confidence, with 95.7% expressing positive perception of tool use. The FLM-supported tool demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 81.3%; however, the potential for false positives or negatives remains, especially given the single-center context. Fuzzy logic stratified patients into risk groups: at risk (33.5%), borderline (20.5%), and no risk (46.0%). ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between AKI risk and factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, clinical/laboratory parameters, surgery types, and nephrotoxic agent usage.

Conclusion: While initial findings support the usability and clinical feasibility of the NURA-AKI tool, further multicenter validation is needed. The tool is designed to complement nurse judgment, promoting early AKI detection and structured risk communication in surgical care without replacing clinical autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信