德国急诊护理(NODE)中的病人导航。多中心混合方法试验的研究方案。

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552
Daniela Krüger, Maria Altendorf, Felix Holzinger, Cornelia Wäscher, Hanna Winkler, Martin Möckel, Christoph Heintze, Judith Stumm, Konrad Schmidt, Anna Slagman
{"title":"德国急诊护理(NODE)中的病人导航。多中心混合方法试验的研究方案。","authors":"Daniela Krüger, Maria Altendorf, Felix Holzinger, Cornelia Wäscher, Hanna Winkler, Martin Möckel, Christoph Heintze, Judith Stumm, Konrad Schmidt, Anna Slagman","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>The objective of the study is to explore and to evaluate existing patient navigation models between emergency departments (ED) and alternative outpatient emergency care providers. Therefore, three different patient navigation models in emergency care in Berlin, Germany will be evaluated regarding their efficiency, quality of care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, costs and cost-effectiveness: (1) a hospital-owned separate outpatient care model within the ED premises or on the hospital grounds, (2) an urgent care practice of the Regional Association of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians at the ED location, and (3) a standard care ED with prospective assessment of patient-care and urgency levels by ED doctors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods, multi-center study design, patients' and health care providers' perspectives assessed by qualitative methods will be triangulated with the results of a quantitative prospective cohort study at six EDs in Berlin, Germany. This study includes four working modules: (1) a systematic literature review; (2) qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients (<i>n</i>∼15-20), as well as four focus group interviews with health care providers (<i>n</i>∼5); (3) a prospective multi-centre cohort study in adult, self-referred emergency patients at two time points (t0: <i>n</i> = 1,031; t1: <i>n</i> = 344), primary endpoint: proportion of patients treated other than standard emergency care, secondary endpoints: secondary efficiency, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient safety, quality of care, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness; participant observation of patients' treatment trajectories and organizational processes at three different patient navigation models (<i>n</i>∼10-15), an online provider survey; and (4) data triangulation and recommendations for practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to compare different patient navigation and cooperation models to standard ED care in Germany and evaluate their effectiveness. Results will provide deep insights into the efficiency, patient satisfaction, quality of care, patient safety and cost-effectiveness. This will help providers and policymakers organise future emergency care in Germany. The study is expected to contribute to health services and systems research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00030398.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1524552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Krüger, Maria Altendorf, Felix Holzinger, Cornelia Wäscher, Hanna Winkler, Martin Möckel, Christoph Heintze, Judith Stumm, Konrad Schmidt, Anna Slagman\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>The objective of the study is to explore and to evaluate existing patient navigation models between emergency departments (ED) and alternative outpatient emergency care providers. Therefore, three different patient navigation models in emergency care in Berlin, Germany will be evaluated regarding their efficiency, quality of care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, costs and cost-effectiveness: (1) a hospital-owned separate outpatient care model within the ED premises or on the hospital grounds, (2) an urgent care practice of the Regional Association of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians at the ED location, and (3) a standard care ED with prospective assessment of patient-care and urgency levels by ED doctors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods, multi-center study design, patients' and health care providers' perspectives assessed by qualitative methods will be triangulated with the results of a quantitative prospective cohort study at six EDs in Berlin, Germany. This study includes four working modules: (1) a systematic literature review; (2) qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients (<i>n</i>∼15-20), as well as four focus group interviews with health care providers (<i>n</i>∼5); (3) a prospective multi-centre cohort study in adult, self-referred emergency patients at two time points (t0: <i>n</i> = 1,031; t1: <i>n</i> = 344), primary endpoint: proportion of patients treated other than standard emergency care, secondary endpoints: secondary efficiency, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient safety, quality of care, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness; participant observation of patients' treatment trajectories and organizational processes at three different patient navigation models (<i>n</i>∼10-15), an online provider survey; and (4) data triangulation and recommendations for practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to compare different patient navigation and cooperation models to standard ED care in Germany and evaluate their effectiveness. Results will provide deep insights into the efficiency, patient satisfaction, quality of care, patient safety and cost-effectiveness. This will help providers and policymakers organise future emergency care in Germany. The study is expected to contribute to health services and systems research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00030398.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1524552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究的目的是探索和评估急诊科(ED)和替代门诊急诊服务提供者之间现有的患者导航模型。因此,将从效率、护理质量、患者安全、患者满意度、成本和成本效益等方面对德国柏林急诊护理中的三种不同患者导航模式进行评估:(1)在急诊科内或医院场地内,医院拥有独立的门诊护理模式,(2)急诊科所在地的地区法定健康保险协会(SHI)医生的紧急护理实践,以及(3)急诊科医生对患者护理和紧急程度进行前瞻性评估的标准护理急诊科。方法:采用趋同、平行、混合方法、多中心的研究设计,通过定性方法评估患者和卫生保健提供者的观点,并将其与德国柏林六家急诊科的定量前瞻性队列研究结果进行三角测量。本研究包括四个工作模块:(1)系统的文献综述;(2)与患者进行定性半结构化访谈(n ~ 15-20),以及与卫生保健提供者进行四次焦点小组访谈(n ~ 5);(3)一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,在两个时间点(t0: n = 1031; t1: n = 344)进行,主要终点:接受非标准急诊治疗的患者比例,次要终点:次要效率、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、患者安全、护理质量、临床结果和成本效益;参与观察患者的治疗轨迹和组织过程在三种不同的患者导航模型(n ~ 10-15),一个在线提供者调查;(4)数据三角分析及实践与政策建议。讨论:这是第一个比较不同患者导航和合作模式与德国标准急诊科护理的研究,并评估其有效性。结果将提供对效率、患者满意度、护理质量、患者安全和成本效益的深刻见解。这将有助于供应商和政策制定者在德国组织未来的紧急护理。预计这项研究将有助于卫生服务和系统研究。试验注册:DRKS00030398。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.

Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.

Background & objective: The objective of the study is to explore and to evaluate existing patient navigation models between emergency departments (ED) and alternative outpatient emergency care providers. Therefore, three different patient navigation models in emergency care in Berlin, Germany will be evaluated regarding their efficiency, quality of care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, costs and cost-effectiveness: (1) a hospital-owned separate outpatient care model within the ED premises or on the hospital grounds, (2) an urgent care practice of the Regional Association of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians at the ED location, and (3) a standard care ED with prospective assessment of patient-care and urgency levels by ED doctors.

Methods: In a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods, multi-center study design, patients' and health care providers' perspectives assessed by qualitative methods will be triangulated with the results of a quantitative prospective cohort study at six EDs in Berlin, Germany. This study includes four working modules: (1) a systematic literature review; (2) qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients (n∼15-20), as well as four focus group interviews with health care providers (n∼5); (3) a prospective multi-centre cohort study in adult, self-referred emergency patients at two time points (t0: n = 1,031; t1: n = 344), primary endpoint: proportion of patients treated other than standard emergency care, secondary endpoints: secondary efficiency, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient safety, quality of care, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness; participant observation of patients' treatment trajectories and organizational processes at three different patient navigation models (n∼10-15), an online provider survey; and (4) data triangulation and recommendations for practice and policy.

Discussion: This is the first study to compare different patient navigation and cooperation models to standard ED care in Germany and evaluate their effectiveness. Results will provide deep insights into the efficiency, patient satisfaction, quality of care, patient safety and cost-effectiveness. This will help providers and policymakers organise future emergency care in Germany. The study is expected to contribute to health services and systems research.

Trial registration: DRKS00030398.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信