改良腹腔镜单体位肾输尿管根治术联合膀胱袖切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2025.0007
Fei Wu, Zhen Wang, Liang Sun, Meixia Zhang, Hao Ning, Zhihong Niu, Jiaju Lyu, Dexuan Gao
{"title":"改良腹腔镜单体位肾输尿管根治术联合膀胱袖切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Fei Wu, Zhen Wang, Liang Sun, Meixia Zhang, Hao Ning, Zhihong Niu, Jiaju Lyu, Dexuan Gao","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2025.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (<i>p</i><0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (<i>p</i><0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"12 3","pages":"e21200049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Fei Wu, Zhen Wang, Liang Sun, Meixia Zhang, Hao Ning, Zhihong Niu, Jiaju Lyu, Dexuan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/bladder.2025.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (<i>p</i><0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (<i>p</i><0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"e21200049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)联合膀胱袖切除术是高危上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的标准治疗方法。目的:本研究旨在评估改良腹腔镜单位RNU联合膀胱袖切除术的安全性、可行性和临床结果。方法:回顾性分析了2022年5月至2024年7月期间接受RNU治疗的诊断为UTUC的患者。参与者被分为三组:A组(39例患者)接受改良技术,B组(38例患者)接受标准腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术并膀胱袖切除术,C组(27例患者)接受腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术并额外的下腹部切口进行膀胱袖切除术。我们比较各组的基线特征、术中变量和术后结果。结果:共纳入分析104例患者。各组患者基线特征差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。A组手术时间明显短于B、C组,输尿管导管拔除时间明显早于B、C组(p < 0.05)。结论:改良腹腔镜单体位RNU联合膀胱袖切除术是一种安全有效的微创治疗UTUC的方法,具有缩短手术时间、早期拔除导管、促进患者康复等优点,支持其广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.

Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.

Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.

Methods: This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.

Results: A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (p>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (p<0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (p<0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信