{"title":"改良腹腔镜单体位肾输尿管根治术联合膀胱袖切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Fei Wu, Zhen Wang, Liang Sun, Meixia Zhang, Hao Ning, Zhihong Niu, Jiaju Lyu, Dexuan Gao","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2025.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (<i>p</i><0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (<i>p</i><0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"12 3","pages":"e21200049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Fei Wu, Zhen Wang, Liang Sun, Meixia Zhang, Hao Ning, Zhihong Niu, Jiaju Lyu, Dexuan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/bladder.2025.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (<i>p</i><0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (<i>p</i><0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"e21200049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of modified laparoscopic single-position radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.
Background: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision represents the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a modified laparoscopic single-position RNU plus bladder cuff resection.
Methods: This retrospective analysis examined patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between May 2022 and July 2024. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (39 patients) underwent the modified technique, Group B (38 patients) received standard laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection, and Group C (27 patients) had laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with an additional lower abdominal incision for bladder cuff resection. We compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes among the groups.
Results: A total of 104 patients were included and analyzed. Their baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among groups (p>0.05). Group A experienced a significantly shorter operative time and earlier ureteral catheter removal compared to Groups B and C (p<0.05). Intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable between Groups A and B, but the results in the two groups were more favorable against Group C (p<0.05). Follow-up revealed no significant differences in tumor recurrence and metastasis rates across groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The modified laparoscopic single-position RNU in combination with bladder cuff resection is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for UTUC, offering advantages like reduced operative time, early catheter removal, and enhanced patient recovery, supporting its broader clinical application.