术前计算机断层尿路造影联合炎症标志物预测根治性膀胱切除术患者淋巴结转移的诊断价值。

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2025.0012
Kun Yang, Mingxin Jiang, Tianyu Zhang, Yunpeng Fan, Yongde Xu, Lei Wang, Xi Zhu, Zhengguo Ji, Wei Qiu, Lang Feng, Jun Li, Daoxin Zhang, Gangyue Hao, Yinong Niu
{"title":"术前计算机断层尿路造影联合炎症标志物预测根治性膀胱切除术患者淋巴结转移的诊断价值。","authors":"Kun Yang, Mingxin Jiang, Tianyu Zhang, Yunpeng Fan, Yongde Xu, Lei Wang, Xi Zhu, Zhengguo Ji, Wei Qiu, Lang Feng, Jun Li, Daoxin Zhang, Gangyue Hao, Yinong Niu","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2025.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymph node metastasis represents a critical prognostic factor in bladder cancer and significantly influences treatment choice and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of the maximum short-axis diameter of pelvic lymph nodes on preoperative computed tomography-urography (CTU), in combination with inflammatory markers, in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in radical cystectomy (RC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 patients who had received CTU within one month before RC at Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2023. Upon screening, 174 patients were included and assigned into two groups based on postoperative pathology: i.e., lymph node metastasis group (n = 43) and non-metastasis group (n = 131). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. The maximum short-axis diameter of a lymph node ≥8 mm was considered indicative of metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess predictive performance, determine optimal cutoffs, and construct a prediction model using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) were observed between groups in clinical T stage, tumor grade, NLR, PLR, MLR, and CTU lymph node diameter. ROC analysis revealed optimal cutoff values for NLR (3.22), PLR (156.4), and MLR (0.62). Multivariate logistic regression identified clinical T stage, CTU lymph node diameter, MLR, and PLR as independent predictors (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The resulting model achieved an area under the curve of 0.847 (95% confidence interval: 0.777 - 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A nomogram incorporating CTU findings, clinical T stage, MLR, and PLR effectively predicts lymph node metastasis in RC patients. However, further multi-center validation is required before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"12 3","pages":"e21200055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of preoperative computed tomography-urography combined with inflammatory markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Kun Yang, Mingxin Jiang, Tianyu Zhang, Yunpeng Fan, Yongde Xu, Lei Wang, Xi Zhu, Zhengguo Ji, Wei Qiu, Lang Feng, Jun Li, Daoxin Zhang, Gangyue Hao, Yinong Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/bladder.2025.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymph node metastasis represents a critical prognostic factor in bladder cancer and significantly influences treatment choice and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of the maximum short-axis diameter of pelvic lymph nodes on preoperative computed tomography-urography (CTU), in combination with inflammatory markers, in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in radical cystectomy (RC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 patients who had received CTU within one month before RC at Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2023. Upon screening, 174 patients were included and assigned into two groups based on postoperative pathology: i.e., lymph node metastasis group (n = 43) and non-metastasis group (n = 131). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. The maximum short-axis diameter of a lymph node ≥8 mm was considered indicative of metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess predictive performance, determine optimal cutoffs, and construct a prediction model using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) were observed between groups in clinical T stage, tumor grade, NLR, PLR, MLR, and CTU lymph node diameter. ROC analysis revealed optimal cutoff values for NLR (3.22), PLR (156.4), and MLR (0.62). Multivariate logistic regression identified clinical T stage, CTU lymph node diameter, MLR, and PLR as independent predictors (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The resulting model achieved an area under the curve of 0.847 (95% confidence interval: 0.777 - 0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A nomogram incorporating CTU findings, clinical T stage, MLR, and PLR effectively predicts lymph node metastasis in RC patients. However, further multi-center validation is required before clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"e21200055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2025.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:淋巴结转移是膀胱癌的一个重要预后因素,并显著影响治疗选择和预后。目的:探讨术前ct -尿路造影(CTU)盆腔淋巴结最大短轴直径结合炎症标志物对根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者淋巴结转移的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年12月在北京友谊医院RC术前1个月内接受CTU治疗的210例患者。经筛选,纳入174例患者,根据术后病理分为两组:淋巴结转移组(n = 43)和无转移组(n = 131)。计算中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)。淋巴结的最大短轴直径≥8mm被认为是转移的指示。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,评估预测效果,确定最佳截止点,并使用多变量逻辑回归构建预测模型。结果:两组患者临床T分期、肿瘤分级、NLR、PLR、MLR、CTU淋巴结直径差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。ROC分析显示NLR(3.22)、PLR(156.4)和MLR(0.62)的最佳临界值。多因素logistic回归发现临床T分期、CTU淋巴结直径、MLR和PLR为独立预测因子(p0.05)。所得模型的曲线下面积为0.847(95%置信区间为0.777 - 0.917)。结论:结合CTU表现、临床T分期、MLR和PLR的nomogram预后方法可有效预测RC患者的淋巴结转移。然而,在临床应用之前,需要进一步的多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic value of preoperative computed tomography-urography combined with inflammatory markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Diagnostic value of preoperative computed tomography-urography combined with inflammatory markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Diagnostic value of preoperative computed tomography-urography combined with inflammatory markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Diagnostic value of preoperative computed tomography-urography combined with inflammatory markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Background: Lymph node metastasis represents a critical prognostic factor in bladder cancer and significantly influences treatment choice and outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the maximum short-axis diameter of pelvic lymph nodes on preoperative computed tomography-urography (CTU), in combination with inflammatory markers, in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in radical cystectomy (RC) patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 patients who had received CTU within one month before RC at Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2023. Upon screening, 174 patients were included and assigned into two groups based on postoperative pathology: i.e., lymph node metastasis group (n = 43) and non-metastasis group (n = 131). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. The maximum short-axis diameter of a lymph node ≥8 mm was considered indicative of metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess predictive performance, determine optimal cutoffs, and construct a prediction model using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between groups in clinical T stage, tumor grade, NLR, PLR, MLR, and CTU lymph node diameter. ROC analysis revealed optimal cutoff values for NLR (3.22), PLR (156.4), and MLR (0.62). Multivariate logistic regression identified clinical T stage, CTU lymph node diameter, MLR, and PLR as independent predictors (P < 0.05). The resulting model achieved an area under the curve of 0.847 (95% confidence interval: 0.777 - 0.917).

Conclusion: A nomogram incorporating CTU findings, clinical T stage, MLR, and PLR effectively predicts lymph node metastasis in RC patients. However, further multi-center validation is required before clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信