研究人工耳蜗使用者心跳处理过程中的血流动力学模式:来自手指敲击研究的见解。

Auditory perception & cognition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1080/25742442.2025.2510182
Samantha Reina O'Connell, Ali Rahimpour Jounghani, Julianne Marie Papadopoulos, Heather Bortfeld, Raymond Lee Goldsworthy
{"title":"研究人工耳蜗使用者心跳处理过程中的血流动力学模式:来自手指敲击研究的见解。","authors":"Samantha Reina O'Connell, Ali Rahimpour Jounghani, Julianne Marie Papadopoulos, Heather Bortfeld, Raymond Lee Goldsworthy","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2025.2510182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with cochlear implants often struggle with melody and timbre perception in music, leading to diminished music appreciation. While they demonstrate proficiency in recognizing beat and rhythm, it remains unclear whether beat information is processed similarly in their brains compared to those with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, adapted from Rahimpour et al. (2020), both cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners engaged in finger tapping tasks that synchronized or syncopated with isochronous beats. Participants were asked to align their taps with an auditory metronome (pacing) and then maintain tapping pace after the metronome attenuation (continuation). Hemodynamic responses were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during tapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed comparable performance between cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners in the finger tapping task, with both groups finding the syncopated continuation task particularly challenging for maintaining consistent tapping. Despite similar tapping performance, cochlear implant users exhibited more widespread hemodynamic activation than normal hearing listeners in temporal, frontal, motor, and parietal regions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cochlear implant users engage auditory-motor networks during beat processing akin to normal hearing listeners; however, factors such as neural adaptation post-cochlear implantation and heightened listening effort may contribute to the observed widespread activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":"8 2","pages":"132-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Hemodynamic Patterns During Beat Processing in Cochlear Implant Users: Insights from a Finger Tapping Study.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Reina O'Connell, Ali Rahimpour Jounghani, Julianne Marie Papadopoulos, Heather Bortfeld, Raymond Lee Goldsworthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742442.2025.2510182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with cochlear implants often struggle with melody and timbre perception in music, leading to diminished music appreciation. While they demonstrate proficiency in recognizing beat and rhythm, it remains unclear whether beat information is processed similarly in their brains compared to those with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, adapted from Rahimpour et al. (2020), both cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners engaged in finger tapping tasks that synchronized or syncopated with isochronous beats. Participants were asked to align their taps with an auditory metronome (pacing) and then maintain tapping pace after the metronome attenuation (continuation). Hemodynamic responses were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during tapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed comparable performance between cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners in the finger tapping task, with both groups finding the syncopated continuation task particularly challenging for maintaining consistent tapping. Despite similar tapping performance, cochlear implant users exhibited more widespread hemodynamic activation than normal hearing listeners in temporal, frontal, motor, and parietal regions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cochlear implant users engage auditory-motor networks during beat processing akin to normal hearing listeners; however, factors such as neural adaptation post-cochlear implantation and heightened listening effort may contribute to the observed widespread activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"132-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419772/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2025.2510182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2025.2510182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植入人工耳蜗的人在音乐的旋律和音色感知方面经常遇到困难,导致音乐欣赏能力下降。虽然他们在识别节拍和节奏方面表现得很熟练,但与听力正常的人相比,他们大脑中处理节拍信息的方式是否相似尚不清楚。方法:在这项研究中,改编自rahimimpour等人(2020),人工耳蜗使用者和正常听力听者都参与了与等时节拍同步或切分的手指敲击任务。参与者被要求与听觉节拍器(起搏)保持一致,然后在节拍器减弱后保持节拍速度(继续)。使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)记录敲打过程中的血流动力学响应。结果:结果显示,人工耳蜗使用者和听力正常的听者在手指敲击任务中的表现相当,两组人都认为切分持续任务对保持持续的敲击特别具有挑战性。尽管敲击的表现相似,人工耳蜗使用者在颞叶、额叶、运动区和顶叶区表现出比正常听者更广泛的血流动力学激活。讨论:人工耳蜗使用者在心跳处理过程中与正常听者相似,参与听觉-运动网络;然而,诸如人工耳蜗植入后的神经适应和听力努力增加等因素可能有助于观察到广泛的激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Hemodynamic Patterns During Beat Processing in Cochlear Implant Users: Insights from a Finger Tapping Study.

Introduction: Individuals with cochlear implants often struggle with melody and timbre perception in music, leading to diminished music appreciation. While they demonstrate proficiency in recognizing beat and rhythm, it remains unclear whether beat information is processed similarly in their brains compared to those with normal hearing.

Methods: In this study, adapted from Rahimpour et al. (2020), both cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners engaged in finger tapping tasks that synchronized or syncopated with isochronous beats. Participants were asked to align their taps with an auditory metronome (pacing) and then maintain tapping pace after the metronome attenuation (continuation). Hemodynamic responses were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during tapping.

Results: Results revealed comparable performance between cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners in the finger tapping task, with both groups finding the syncopated continuation task particularly challenging for maintaining consistent tapping. Despite similar tapping performance, cochlear implant users exhibited more widespread hemodynamic activation than normal hearing listeners in temporal, frontal, motor, and parietal regions.

Discussion: Cochlear implant users engage auditory-motor networks during beat processing akin to normal hearing listeners; however, factors such as neural adaptation post-cochlear implantation and heightened listening effort may contribute to the observed widespread activation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信