自闭症与非自闭症大学生学业经历的自我知觉、元知觉及同伴判断比较

Autism in adulthood : challenges and management Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1089/aut.2024.0107
Afaf Alhusayni, Elizabeth Sheppard, Lauren Marsh
{"title":"自闭症与非自闭症大学生学业经历的自我知觉、元知觉及同伴判断比较","authors":"Afaf Alhusayni, Elizabeth Sheppard, Lauren Marsh","doi":"10.1089/aut.2024.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has shown that, when presented with brief samples of behavior, non-autistic university students judge autistic peers less favorably than non-autistic peers on measures of academic experience (e.g., motivation to study, academic success, average grades). The current research aimed to determine whether these judgments accurately reflect the academic experiences of the autistic students, or represent a bias of non-autistic perceivers. We also investigated whether autistic students are aware of how they are perceived by their peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen autistic and 19 non-autistic students (stimulus participants) were video recorded while completing a questionnaire about their academic experience. They self-reported their level of academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and average grades. They also reported their meta-perceptions about the same measures. Recorded videos were presented to 30 new non-autistic students (perceivers), who were asked to judge each stimulus participants' academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autistic stimulus participants were rated less positively than non-autistic stimulus participants on all measures except motivation to study. Comparison with participants' self-reports showed that perceivers' judgments had a strong negative bias for ratings of autistic stimulus participants, but this bias was also present for non-autistic stimulus participants on some measures. Comparison of perceiver perceptions with stimulus participants' meta-perceptions showed that neither group of participants was aware how they were perceived, and the autistic group expected to be perceived in an overly positive way.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We replicated previous research showing autistic people are perceived less favorably by non-autistic others in relation to their academic experience. As the perceptions were not accurate, we suggest this reflects a persistent bias in the perception of autistic people. Nevertheless, over time this bias could genuinely impact academic outcomes of autistic students, if it leads to exclusion from social and peer learning opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"7 4","pages":"493-504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Self-Perceptions, Meta-Perceptions, and Peer Judgments of the Academic Experience of Autistic and Non-Autistic University Students.\",\"authors\":\"Afaf Alhusayni, Elizabeth Sheppard, Lauren Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/aut.2024.0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has shown that, when presented with brief samples of behavior, non-autistic university students judge autistic peers less favorably than non-autistic peers on measures of academic experience (e.g., motivation to study, academic success, average grades). The current research aimed to determine whether these judgments accurately reflect the academic experiences of the autistic students, or represent a bias of non-autistic perceivers. We also investigated whether autistic students are aware of how they are perceived by their peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen autistic and 19 non-autistic students (stimulus participants) were video recorded while completing a questionnaire about their academic experience. They self-reported their level of academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and average grades. They also reported their meta-perceptions about the same measures. Recorded videos were presented to 30 new non-autistic students (perceivers), who were asked to judge each stimulus participants' academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autistic stimulus participants were rated less positively than non-autistic stimulus participants on all measures except motivation to study. Comparison with participants' self-reports showed that perceivers' judgments had a strong negative bias for ratings of autistic stimulus participants, but this bias was also present for non-autistic stimulus participants on some measures. Comparison of perceiver perceptions with stimulus participants' meta-perceptions showed that neither group of participants was aware how they were perceived, and the autistic group expected to be perceived in an overly positive way.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We replicated previous research showing autistic people are perceived less favorably by non-autistic others in relation to their academic experience. As the perceptions were not accurate, we suggest this reflects a persistent bias in the perception of autistic people. Nevertheless, over time this bias could genuinely impact academic outcomes of autistic students, if it leads to exclusion from social and peer learning opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"493-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417817/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,当提供简短的行为样本时,非自闭症大学生在学业经历(如学习动机、学业成功、平均成绩)方面对自闭症同龄人的评价不如非自闭症同龄人。目前的研究旨在确定这些判断是否准确地反映了自闭症学生的学术经历,还是代表了非自闭症感知者的偏见。我们还调查了自闭症学生是否意识到他们是如何被同龄人看待的。方法:对19名自闭症学生和19名非自闭症学生(刺激参与者)进行录像,同时填写学业经历问卷。他们自我报告了学业成功程度、学习动机、大学幸福感和平均成绩。他们还报告了他们对相同测量的元认知。将录制好的视频呈现给30名新的非自闭症学生(感知者),他们被要求判断每个刺激参与者的学业成就、学习动机、大学幸福感和成绩。结果:除学习动机外,自闭症刺激被试在所有指标上均低于非自闭症刺激被试。与被试自我报告的比较表明,知觉者对自闭症被试的评价存在强烈的负向偏倚,但在某些指标上对非自闭症被试的评价也存在这种偏倚。知觉者知觉与刺激被试元知觉的比较表明,两组被试都没有意识到自己是如何被感知的,自闭症被试期望被以一种过于积极的方式感知。结论:我们重复了先前的研究,表明自闭症患者在学术经历方面被非自闭症患者认为不那么友好。由于感知不准确,我们认为这反映了对自闭症患者感知的持续偏见。然而,随着时间的推移,这种偏见可能会真正影响自闭症学生的学业成绩,如果它导致被排除在社交和同伴学习机会之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Self-Perceptions, Meta-Perceptions, and Peer Judgments of the Academic Experience of Autistic and Non-Autistic University Students.

Background: Previous research has shown that, when presented with brief samples of behavior, non-autistic university students judge autistic peers less favorably than non-autistic peers on measures of academic experience (e.g., motivation to study, academic success, average grades). The current research aimed to determine whether these judgments accurately reflect the academic experiences of the autistic students, or represent a bias of non-autistic perceivers. We also investigated whether autistic students are aware of how they are perceived by their peers.

Methods: Nineteen autistic and 19 non-autistic students (stimulus participants) were video recorded while completing a questionnaire about their academic experience. They self-reported their level of academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and average grades. They also reported their meta-perceptions about the same measures. Recorded videos were presented to 30 new non-autistic students (perceivers), who were asked to judge each stimulus participants' academic success, motivation to study, happiness at university, and grades.

Results: Autistic stimulus participants were rated less positively than non-autistic stimulus participants on all measures except motivation to study. Comparison with participants' self-reports showed that perceivers' judgments had a strong negative bias for ratings of autistic stimulus participants, but this bias was also present for non-autistic stimulus participants on some measures. Comparison of perceiver perceptions with stimulus participants' meta-perceptions showed that neither group of participants was aware how they were perceived, and the autistic group expected to be perceived in an overly positive way.

Conclusions: We replicated previous research showing autistic people are perceived less favorably by non-autistic others in relation to their academic experience. As the perceptions were not accurate, we suggest this reflects a persistent bias in the perception of autistic people. Nevertheless, over time this bias could genuinely impact academic outcomes of autistic students, if it leads to exclusion from social and peer learning opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信